Talk:List of Deadliest Warrior episodes

Reenactments
They cannot be REENACTMENTS because they never occured prior. AMWS (talk) 20:48, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

This may sound dumb
But what instruments do they play during the simulation battles?

?
What was the special announcement in the Live episode of Vampire-Zombie? AMWS (talk) 20:07, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Green Beret & Spetsnaz
They said that the armor was so similar, they cancelled each other out; can someone tell me what armor they would have used? 207.144.59.103 (talk) 19:10, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

No. it wasn't said in the episode so we can't say for certain. At least I don't think it was said. Am I wrong?

No they didnt. but would they use like bulletproof vests???207.144.59.103 (talk) 16:40, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Two Questions
1. Why is there 63 Zombies against one Vampire?

2. The Centurion drew his gladius from his left side; thought the Romans drew from their right side (though they were right-handed) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.144.59.103 (talk) 17:59, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

1. It was announced on the site that the ratio of zombies to vampires was 63 to 1. This had something to do with speed but I wasn't quite sure the extent of their research. It will probably be more detailed in the episode.

2. It doesn't explain in the episode so the question is unanswerable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidumstattd (talk • contribs) 22:40, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

1. Speed of what? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.144.59.103 (talk) 18:28, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

1- Because a martial arts expert and world class board-breaker did a test on how many attacking zombie dummies he could take out before they all reached an area he was to defend. He took 9 out ot 12. That number, multiplied by 6 to adjust for the Vampire's superior speed gave an average of 63 zombies per Vampire (Vampires are inherently superior, so it was deducted that 63 zombies was more or less the number of zombies that could perhaps overwhelm a vampire.)189.187.162.246 (talk) 10:27, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

S3 Warriors
Was wondering if you guys could add the Doc's "Start From Scratch" info (age, height, weight) to each warrior?

I can do you one better and add height, weight, and gear for all three seasons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BoredMe (talk • contribs) 09:20, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Why are the results of the demo at the end of the episode not shown?
"For long range weapons, the Army Rangers's Dildo was tested on four static targets, a moving target, and a camouflaged counter sniper. It successfully killed all of its targets in 1:48." I found this little bit of vandalism...thought you guys should know... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.130.160.67 (talk) 03:30, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Weapons (S3)
Was just wondering WHERE you guys find what weaponry they are using. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.144.59.103 (talk) 16:21, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

I believe we should only post weapons if they are officially described in deadliest warrior episodes. Therefore we should take down most of the posts for the season 3 episodes that haven't happened yet. Also if we do know some of the weapons from clips from the show that are announced early we should post those but specify that the list is incomplete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.184.76.111 (talk) 04:05, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Ya, I added Ivan IV's battle axe (cuz he swings it around during the DW intro and then it switches over t o the axe hitting the neck of a gel torso). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.144.59.103 (talk) 16:13, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

You shouldn't add a weapon unless you know what it is called. And you can't be sure that a weapon in the intro is used by a certain warrior unless there is written proof of it. For example we should add "Zombie Hands" to the list of zombie weapons since that was announced in the clip that was shown at Comic Con but nothing else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.73.20.64 (talk) 18:52, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Took the liberty of removing all unannounced weapons I could find from the list so people wouldn't assume a weapon has been announced when it hasn't. Posting conjectures of what the weapons are going to be on this page is dishonest. To quote from some text from a rule on wikipedia "Encyclopedic content must be verifiable" Also we should probably make a note that the lists are incomplete such as with the machine guns for Rosevelt vs. Lawrence of Arabia. We don't want people thinking that they will only have one weapon. Just that only one weapon has been announced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.73.20.64 (talk) 18:59, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Dude r u a noob do u know anything about weapons? It is clear that the IV's weapon is a battle axe noob — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.144.59.103 (talk) 13:13, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

I did not single out the supposedly titled "battle ax" I chose all weapons that were not "Verified" by official announcements. However Battle ax is far to general of a weapon title. It would be like saying that Hannibal's weapon was a "Sword" and Genghis Khan's weapon was a "Saber" both would be incorrect because the weapons they used were much more specific. We have to take down all weapons that have not been officially announced.

I ask you to read what is right below this comment box "Encyclopedic content must be verifiable" Unless you can verify that the term that will be used in the actual show is "battle ax" it has to be taken down. As well as with all the other weapons that haven't been announced yet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidumstattd (talk • contribs) 22:39, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Another thing. The zombies vs. Vampires section should list "Zombie Hands" as one of the weapons. That one was actually announced in the sneak peak video posted at Comic Con. Davidumstattd (talk) 22:51, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

how is a zombie gonna kill with its hands? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.144.59.103 (talk) 18:29, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

-Looks at intro again- My apologies, Ivan's weapon is a bardiche. Lol. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.144.59.103 (talk) 18:12, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Its not my place to answer "how a zombie can kill with its hands" I'm only supposed to report what the show says and the sneak peak showed "Zombie Hands" as one of the listed weapons during the Zombie Hands test. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidumstattd (talk • contribs) 14:08, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

No no no. you don't seem to understand my point about the battle ax Bardiche point. I'm saying that even though your probably right about that weapon we shouldn't post unannounced weapons because we are saying "We know absolutely that this is the weapon used." when in reality we are saying "We are 99% sure this is the weapon used." different statements so there will be miscommunication which violates the creed of Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidumstattd (talk • contribs) 14:10, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

But it is a bardiche xD. Battle axes dont have just one side. the mid-range is clearly a long pole-arm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.144.59.103 (talk) 15:16, 25 August 2011 (UTC)


 * headdesk* look I don't care how sure you are of what it is, we can't go around posting conjecture. That's not how an encyclopedia works. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidumstattd (talk • contribs) 23:36, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Listen VERY closely: Battle axe = Two-Handed Close range weapon Bardiche = pole-arm 207.144.59.103 (talk) 21:01, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Well there we go. It wasn't called a battle ax after all. All the more reason not to guess at what the names are. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidumstattd (talk • contribs) 03:46, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

So? I said it WAS a bardiche! XD 209.213.22.184 (talk) 18:25, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

IRA - Taliban?
The IRA killed a taliban w/ the taliban's bayonet, and the taliban killed his own man w/ rocket launcher. Where do you take that off on the kill chart? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.144.59.103 (talk) 16:42, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

It doesn't matter. Its just a reenactment. The final result is based on a computer program. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidumstattd (talk • contribs) 01:52, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Yeah but if they did that the scores wouldn't equal 1000. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.144.59.103 (talk) 23:51, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

The reenactment is just a reenactment. Its not a representation of the computer program. And why are you asking us? We're not Spike. Ask them. Its not our place to answer every question its our place to just tell the facts of what happened in the episodes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidumstattd (talk • contribs) 22:42, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

if u dunno the answer, dont answer it, then. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.144.59.103 (talk) 18:21, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Seals/Israeli number don't add up correctly
With the current individual weapon results, the Seal total should be 478, and the Israeli commando total should be 492. Am not sure if the numbers were copied incorrectly or the show messed up. 24.14.34.208 (talk) 03:14, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

The Commando individuals added up to 485 not 482. The Seal individual total was 518. So there are 3 points over, not sure where they came from. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.193.181.71 (talk) 14:25, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
 * People are messing the numebrs up, the KA-BAR got 42 kills and the Glock got 98 kills.--76.83.13.221 (talk) 22:16, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Metsubushi
Some of the weapon/equipment names have been changed, which is understandable to avoid some confusion (e.g. naming the Spartan Shield Aspis and Xiphos, both words mentioned on the show), but "Metsubushi" is not Japanese for "black egg". It is a technique and not the "black egg" as an object. Colonel Marksman (talk) 07:41, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

It's true - "Black Egg" in Japanese is "Kuroi Tamago;" or "Glass Egg" is "Garasu no Tamago." SOURCE: Google Translate — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.144.59.103 (talk) 16:15, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Every weapon should have the title it was given in the show even if that is the inaccurate one. We have to be true to the facts and not try to fix them for the sake of real life accuracy. Its a show.

Spartan/Ninja weapons
Why are the names given to the Spartan's shield, sword, and spear and the Ninja's eggs and blowgun listed? Sure, they mentioned in the show that the Short Sword's name was the Xiphos and (I think, anyways, I can't quite remember) that the spears name was the dory. But why are those, the "Aspis", "Metsubushi", and "Fukiya" listed? During the episode, they called the Xiphos a "Short Sword", the Aspis a "shield", the Dory a "spear", the metsubushi "black eggs", and the fukiya a "blowgun". The page should list THOSE names because those were the names given in the show.

Don't change it back until a good reason can be listed here for the discrimination of the words. Colonel Marksman (talk) 03:22, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Battle summaries
These battle summaries are all taken from the Deadliest Warrior Wiki, just check any of the warrior pages at www.deadliestwarrior.wikia.com and check the battle sim for the corresponding warrior here. They're the same. We should either write our own battles or cite the Wiki. Thoughts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.2.181.254 (talk) 03:08, 29 September 2010 (UTC)


 * The other issue is they are far, far too detailed. FT2 (Talk 23:14, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

So what should we do about that, then? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.2.181.254 (talk) 17:26, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Delete and rewrite the summaries? Bakilas (talk) 06:06, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

"The IRA leader kills a Taliban with his bayonet, then lures the remaining Arab into a bus where he detonates a nail bomb." Lots shorter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.144.59.103 (talk) 16:16, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Addendum to the Navy Seals/Isreali Commandos episode
I have taken the liberty of deleting the addendum to the Navy Seals/Israeli Commandos episode claiming that "American egos will not allow them to lose" as it is a wholly subjective opinion with no source to validate the claim which the user made in regards to the Israeli Commandos--"3rd best in world behind SAS and SBS" —Preceding unsigned comment added by BoredMe (talk • contribs) 11:34, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Hey it is true though, they automatically make the USA warriors win. It's inaccurate, inappropriate, and lack of reason to do so. If they keep doing this (Army Rangers, Crazy Horse, and Theo. Roosevelt win) they need to go off air. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.144.59.103 (talk) 15:03, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Your opinions have no place on Wikipedia. This is a place to state fact not conjecture or opinion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidumstattd (talk • contribs) 22:44, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry but it is a fact that they are biasts. lol ahem anyways... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.144.59.103 (talk) 20:14, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Separate Paragraphs in the Reenactment Sub-Section
The reenactment sub-section on each episodes needs to have paragraphs, because they contain walls of texts, which makes reading difficult. JMBZ-12 (talk) 19:48, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Smallest margin of victory?
Shouldn't the article mention under the George Washington vs. Napoleon Bonaparte episode that it had the smallest margin of victory (by percentage, due to the increase from 1,000 simulated battles to 5,000 starting in the third season)? PokeHomsar (talk) 03:41, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Well [up to date, now] U.S. Army Rangers vs NKSOF was closest. Although they automatically max out the American warriors then make it close to make it believable...ANYWAYS... I wanna see a "won-by-one-kill" simulation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.144.59.103 (talk) 21:25, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I posted this comment before that episode aired, sir. PokeHomsar (talk) 22:16, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

In the show they actually say that The George Washinton episode was "ONE of the closest matches in deadliest warrior history." and they say that the NCSOF vs. Army Rangers was "THE closest match in deadliest warrior history." so until season 4 we can say that NCSOF vs. Army rangers is the closest margin. Its hard to give citation for this since its said in the episode (at the end) so you'll just have to watch it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.184.76.111 (talk) 04:09, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Yeah...about that...do ANY ONE OF YOU have proof of a Season 4 for Deadliest Warrior? Anyone at all? Didn't think so. Yeah the USAR & NKSOF is the closest MODERN. What about ANCIENT? Samurai-Viking? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.144.59.103 (talk) 23:53, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Its somewhat difficult to calculate the closest margin because of the differences from seasons 1-2 and season 3. They increase the number of battles so it depends. Are you choosing the closest actual number of the closest percentage? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidumstattd (talk • contribs) 22:46, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Shortest battle?
I think we should list the shortest battle of the series, since we list the longest, that being the CIA vs. KGB episode. Looking at it, I think the shortest battle is the William Wallace vs. Shaka Zulu episode but I can't be sure. PokeHomsar (talk) 04:13, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Really? My opinion is Washington vs Bonaparte, the summary seems to be smallest of them all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.144.59.103 (talk) 15:01, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

It's Roman Centurion vs. Rajput Warrior. It's even listed there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.2.181.254 (talk) 21:02, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Ivan's ranged weapon is called a "matchlock"
In the recent sneak peak it is revealed that Ivan's ranged weapon will be the "Matchlock." This is a perfect example of why we shouldn't post weapons until they are announced. We believed the weapon to have another title yet we were wrong and posted wrong information for the world to see. This is very serious in my mind. Please don't post weapons unless you have documented evidence that that weapon is the exact one (and exact wording) that will be used in the show. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidumstattd (talk • contribs) 14:17, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Who says a pishchal wasnt a matchlock? Anyway, I thought they said the Arquebus was matchlock 207.144.59.103 (talk) 19:33, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

I wasn't saying the pishchal isn't a matchlock I"m saying that the word they are using for the weapon is "matchlock" so the word we should use should be the exact same as theirs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidumstattd (talk • contribs) 23:34, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

The most recent "Aftermath" episode had them call Ivan's weapon a "matchlock" again so I'm going to change the name to just that. I know that sounds weird and off but that's the word their using so that's what we should put up. Also there was a huge amount of extra data on the Teddy Roosevelt vs. Lawrence of Arabia match-up that I think should be added. You all should take a look. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidumstattd (talk • contribs) 04:14, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Ivan IV: Pishcal. Oh yeah; WHO WAS RIGHT?! xD (P.S. in my spelling I added an "h," but it doesn't matter xD)  AMWS (talk) 20:08, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

we missed some X factors for Ivan The Terrible vs. Hernan Cortez
In the final results there were actually several more x factors revealed namely Physicality and generalship. This also brings up another question, should we add the x factors listed in the screen shots of the computer? They list all the x factors and that would be amazing if we could have them all. Not certain if those are accurate should we do that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidumstattd (talk • contribs) 13:20, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

NO 207.144.59.103 (talk) 20:23, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

The X-Factor's seen on Robert's computor are probably not actual values for the warriors. My guess is that they are random numbers written up as part of a technology mockup that is superimposed over what actually appears on the screen and is filmed, just to make things more dramatic, just like the green lines of binary code crisscrossing the computor screen before it zoom in to the episode's acted-out battle. Obviously the binary code and the zooming into the screen before the battle was artifically added. (Iuio (talk) 20:05, 13 September 2011 (UTC))

The X-Factors are real numbers, but if they show a couple of extra ones at the very end, don't add those. Just use the ones they talk about before the battle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.238.131.187 (talk) 12:14, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

In the one on one between Ivan and Cortez- Ivan Szabla was better by 8% than Cortez Espada ropera the own demonstration by horseback charge--yet the edge is given to Cortez???? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.83.72.154 (talk) 16:54, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Read it again, noob. It CLEARLY has the Sablina in bold - marking the edge. AMWS (talk) 23:58, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

They announce both the x factors before the fight and the x factors they list after the fight. Both are actual numbers and both must be listed. The only question is if the x factors in the screen shots are accurate which we can't verify so at least just include the x factors announced before and after the fight. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.198.88.229 (talk) 19:36, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Fatigue
In George Washington vs Napoleon Bonaparte, wouldn't the X-Factor of Fatigue be opposite of the normal tally? Wouldn't a higher number in Fatigue mean being tired quicker? AMWS (talk) 20:46, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Higher numbers are always better for the x factors. So if someone's Fatigue x factor was higher then that means they get tired less often. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.198.88.229 (talk) 22:43, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Special Release Episode
On the DW Facebook page,it has confirmed that their will be a special realese episode w. DW Ancient Combat. Cam someone take the liberty on adding this info? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.201.90.134 (talk) 13:00, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Do we know when that episode will be added? That's what I think people want to know most. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.198.88.229 (talk) 22:45, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Vampires vs Zombies
The vampires won more battles in the computer. They should be listed as the winners. The lead vampire turning into a zombie doesn't change the fact that the zombies lost — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.238.139.193 (talk) 00:34, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

The Vampires won the first match; The Zombies infected the Vampires with their virus,and a "To Be Continued' was added. That is part of the battle. --76.201.90.134 (talk) 23:32, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

The vampire does not turn into a zombie during the final battle sequence. The vampire turns into a zombie during a clip after the battle is announced as an example of what could have happened (but did not) stop adding that part to the final battle. It didn't take place in the battle so it shouldn't be listed. Period.

Waffen SS correction
I've taken the liberty of deleting the entry where it claims that the Waffen SS are the biggest jerks on the show so far. Look..it's possibly true; you can argue for Saddam Hussein or Pol Pot, or even Vlad the Impaler or Ivan the Terrible, but they are still up there. That said, it is still a subjective value judgement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.92.172.192 (talk) 11:51, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

"List of episodes"?
This is supposed to be a list article, presenting a brief list of episodes of this show, right? I mean, wth:
 * ''The battle begins at night inside an abandoned warehouse, where 189 zombies are searching for a food source. Somewhere inside the warehouse, 3 vampires rise from their resting coffins ready to feast. The lead vampire communicates to his comrades in hisses and growls, ordering them to split up. In a hallway, the male subordinate vampire rakes his claws on a wall. He uses his heightened senses to sniff out his prey and dashes down a corridor, jumping up a railed stairway until he comes to a wooden door. He puts his ear up next to the door listening for any commotion. A zombie suddenly smashes the door, startling the vampire. As the zombies begin to pour through the doorway, the vampire regains his wits and puts his claws to work, slashing and swiping 2 zombies who come through the door. He soon is overwhelmed and runs back to the corridor where the rest of the zombies have begun to come through the other exits, blocking all paths of escape. He goes to work again, using his claws to take down 76 zombies before being completely engulfed by the zombie horde. The zombies grab and begin to hold down the fatigued vampire as he calls for help. The female vampire and the lead vampire answer the male's cries, but are too late to help their friend, and look on in horror as the zombies hold him down and disembowel him. The lead vampire hisses to the female to run for it and they take off down a hallway with a door. As the lead opens the door, they are greeted by another horde of zombies. He bites the first zombie in the doorway in the top of the skull and shuts the door, holding it down along with the female vampire, who locks it behind them. The both of them take off down the way they came as the horde smashes through the door and shambles on through. The vampire duo soon arrives back to where the first horde came in and both begin to massacre the zombies, taking down 58 of them. Eventually, the female vampire is attacked from behind as a zombie bites through her neck, breaking her jugular vein. She throws the offending zombie at the wall and stomps another one dead before dying of blood loss herself, leaving the leader to fight 50 zombies on his own. The lead vampire continues to fight, killing 6 zombies as fatigue begins to set in. As he slows down, he is swarmed from all sides by zombies that try to hold him down. The vampire throws them all off, killing 4 and rakes a fifth across the face before it can get any closer. Out of breath, the lead vampire attempts to leave through an exit door, but retreats back inside as he sees the dawn breaking in front of him. The vampire comes face-to-face with the remaining 39 zombies, killing them one by one. He then punches the last one in the face and throws him against a wall, killing him. The vampire looks around to make sure all the zombies are dead, then raises his hand and roars in victory.''

TLDR Seriously, who writes this stuff?? If this is expanded into a narrative, beyond a simple list of episodes, content will need to be based on published reviews of the show, not written on-wiki. --dab (𒁳) 14:33, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Split article into 3?
This article should be split into three articles due to length.--Jax 0677 (talk) 21:47, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

No that was un constructive and should be reversed Irishfrisian (talk) 01:22, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

This article was unilateraly split by Jax0677 (admittedly 10 days after stating his intentions on the talk page above). There was no apparant objection until Irishfrisian unilateraly undid the changes to this article (admitedly giving 8 minutes notice above). We now have this article containing all seasons and any changes since Jax0677's changes were reverted, plus the 3 sub articles that Jax0677 created plus any changes since they were created. I.e. we have duplicate articles that are diverging. We need to choos wheter this article is split into the 3 sub articles, one per season or we keep this article intact and delete the 3 sub articles. Op47 (talk) 18:17, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

RfC split article
Should the content pertaining to the 3 seasons be removed and instead this article point to the 3 subarticles created over a year ago. It should noted that if this change is not made then the sub articles will be submitted to to AfD instead. Op47 (talk) 18:17, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Survey
Please only "vote" in this section. Any discussion to go into threaded discussion.
 * Oppose. This full episode list existed first and should be kept, the 3 season episode lists (made more recently) should be AfD'd as they contain identical content. As per WP:AVOIDSPLIT, articles shouldn't be split where not necessary. The original creator of the 3 season episode lists cited length as the reason for dividing the content, however, length is only an issue if the readability of the text is affected (WP:LENGTH) which it is not. This article is perfectly readable. N4 (talk) 01:08, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on List of Deadliest Warrior episodes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090411170026/http://www.thedailyaztec.com:80/tempo/boob-tube-scoop-deadliest-warrior-attacks-1.1646236 to http://www.thedailyaztec.com/tempo/boob-tube-scoop-deadliest-warrior-attacks-1.1646236
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110921165701/http://www.spike.com/full-episodes/i6593b/deadliest-warrior-mack-reveals-dw3-details-season-33-ep-300m to http://www.spike.com/full-episodes/i6593b/deadliest-warrior-mack-reveals-dw3-details-season-33-ep-300m

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 14:31, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Flammenwerfer 41 Mis-Linked?
Yolo McSwagginz93 (talk) 20:42, 7 July 2016 (UTC)In the episode 14 section if you click the Flammenwerfer 41 link it takes you to the Flammenwerfer 35 page, and I know there's a Flammenwerfer 41 page because I have read it (you can get to it from the Flammenwerfer 35 page), but I'm a noob to Wikipedia and I probably mess it up if I Tried to fix it, can somebody help out please???

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Deadliest Warrior episodes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090523142657/http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS153858+16-Oct-2008+PRN20081016 to https://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS153858+16-Oct-2008+PRN20081016

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:03, 25 December 2017 (UTC)