Talk:List of Downton Abbey characters/Archive 1

Relevance
Is such a huge page really relevant or necessary? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.66.84.141 (talk) 09:44, 17 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Information on the characters in a show that enjoys both high viewers and an incredibly strong critical focus is relevant to have. Regarding the size (and quality) of the article it does need a lot of work in regards to trimming some character sections for relevancy and also structuring it more from a real world perspective (disussing the approach of actors and writers and how the characters have been received in the media). Eshlare (talk) 18:16, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Cleanup
So, I'm going to cleanup the page. Cut out excess plot, insert important details that were left out. I was going to simplify the headings because they seem to be a bit ridiculous. Like "Lady Sybil Crawley, later Lady Sybil Branson", can't we just stick with "Sybil Crawley" or "Sybil Branson" (and then anchor the other?). And it isn't necessary to have Lady in the heading. I think titles should be left out of the headings, and then mentioned in the first sentence. That's probably the most controversial thing I'm going to do.... ~Cheers, Ten  Ton  Parasol  22:14, 22 September 2012 (UTC)


 * The Lady, later... business is there to avoid in-universe form.  The characters have to be presented so readers will be familiar with them at any point in their history.  We discussed this at some length on the main article page, and this is the correct form for these names.  I do agree that the descriptions are way overloaded with plot, however.  --Drmargi (talk) 23:38, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Merp. Didn't even look at the main page. So I'll just leave it as is and add hidden anchors to make wikilinking easier. ~Cheers, Ten  Ton  Parasol  00:59, 23 September 2012 (UTC)


 * I don't disagree (double negative alert!) that it's cumbersome, but it's also the best of a bad group of options. It took a while to find a decent compromise (I still argue that Sybil should not have the title attached to her married name), but it works. --Drmargi (talk) 06:59, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * So, I'm working on this on one of my subpages (doing that makes me more comfortable). Shortening up the supporting and more minor characters isn't going so well (I keep adding about two hundred to five hundred characters without refs), but I don't think that'll happen with the main guys. Anyways, any particular reason the characters are ordered like they are? I'm not seeing an obvious pattern. I thought ordering them by credited appearance in the opening for the main actors and order of appearance for everyone else. (Of course, unless that's how they're already ordered. I don't know the opening credits very well...) ~Cheers,  Ten  Ton  Parasol  23:49, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Ignore that last bit. The way the opening credits are ordered would make absolutely no sense. ~Cheers, Ten  Ton  Parasol  15:14, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Would it be a problem to remove the née's from the opening line for those women who weren't married when the series began? For example, remove it from Daisy's. ~Cheers, Ten  Ton  Parasol  18:20, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Forget it, I'll leave it. ~Cheers, Ten  Ton  Parasol  18:52, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Is it inappropriate to place Martha Levinson, Cora's mother, under Crawley family? ~Cheers, Ten  Ton  Parasol  03:27, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Question about Sir Anthony Strallan
How do we know he is indeed a baronet and not just a knight ? Has this ever been mentioned explicitly on the show ? 161.24.19.112 (talk) 17:41, 27 August 2013 (UTC)


 * It's implicit onscreen rather than explicit (though I suspect it's covered in some of the companion books and other material) but other than age & injury he's considered a reasonably traditional husband for an Earl's daughter and so pesumably not somebody who has had his own title conferred. Timrollpickering (talk) 23:05, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

5th or 6th Earl?
I thought Robert was the 6th Earl - and what little we've been told of the family financial history suggests the 5th Earl was Robert's father who was bailed out by Cora's money rather than the 4th who only saved things by dying - when was this changed or is the source unreliable? Timrollpickering (talk) 23:05, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I think the 5th Earl information is just taken from a picture of Sybil's gravestone. However, that prop has only been seen in an unofficial paparazzi picture and hasn't yet been seen in the show. (Someone please correct me if I'm wrong but I'm 99% sure we didn't see Sybil's grave when we saw Matthew's) Therefore I don't personally think it can be taken as canon information until it's seen in the show. They could have made the prop and then deliberately not shown it clearly because it shows the wrong info. There is a new behind the scenes book out at the moment - does anyone know if that has information on this subject? --88.104.126.188 (talk) 14:08, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

7th Earl
The latest behind the scenes book doesn't have any reference to the number of earls there have been. However, the "Downton Abbey:A new era" book refers to Robert as the seventh earl of Grantham. Shouldn't this official book be given more weight than a paparazzi pic of a prop that hasn't appeared in the show? Official material lists him as the seventh earl and he should be called such on this page. Bluebellanon (talk) 09:58, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Matthew indicates in series 3 that his great-grandfather was a younger son of the 3rd Earl and Violet indicates in the first episode that the new heir is Robert's 3rd cousin once removed. If you combine these details, he has to be the 7th Earl

Evelyn Napier in series 5?
Isn't that an error? What evidence is there that napier will appear in series 5? Labelleflamme (talk) 14:43, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Mr Green's death
It is explicitly said (in episode 8 of season 4) that Mr Green died in Piccadilly - not Picadilly Circus, as this article states (with a spelling mistake). I am unaware how to change this, since it involves changing the link (characters in blue).

Jfp2006 Jfp2006 (talk) 06:40, 7 November 2014 (UTC)


 * I have fixed this, the link can be edited in the same way as the rest of the article by just changing the words in the square bracket. Dabbler (talk) 11:53, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Miss Denker
Whilst she's fairly new and not yet appeared that many episodes, she has been the major focus of at least two (admittedly not main) storylines (the chicken soup and the gambling club) Adagio67 (talk) 21:14, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

"In-universe" writing
The page needs a major rewrite to bring it to encyclopedic standards. At the moment it is written "in universe", meaning it is written as if the characters were real, with birth information etc., that is simply part of the "plot". This must be taken care of. This is not a fan site and the article is in danger of deletion unless it conforms to Wikipedia standards. This does not mean we have to lose a large chunk of the content, but it does mean that the writing must reflect the real world aspects of this as a production and these people as characters portrayed by actors and have no historic counterpart and are completely fictitious.--Mark Miller (talk) 19:13, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Per WP:Real world:

--Mark Miller (talk) 19:17, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Some references
A long time ago, I collected a bunch of references in my userspace for an overhaul of the article. At this point, I'm just going to leave them here in case anyone else finds use out of them. I haven't gone through them at this time, so I'm unsure what's actually helpful and what's broken and so on.
 * About the cricket match
 * Mary's tiara
 * Ref for medical advisor
 * Time Magazine video
 * Edwardian Promenade video of the Homes & Garden feature
 * Digital Spy video with the cast
 * PBS with the cast on who they would like to play
 * Helen James Production video
 * Lady Magazine countdown to Downton series 3
 * Findlay and Leech with Radio Times on series two and behind the scenes
 * Lesley Nicols on the Alan Titchmarsh Show
 * Gay kiss censored in Greece
 * Review
 * Leech with Mr Porter
 * Leech with Daily Mail
 * Leech with Whats on TV
 * Leech with The Scotsman
 * Stevens with Whats on TV
 * Dan Stevens with Daily Mail on Matthew
 * Dan Stevens with the Daily Mail
 * AP video on series 3 (Cora) and her new role
 * Fellowes ith the LA Times Mag
 * Michelle with the LA TImes Mag
 * Guardian on Sybil's death
 * Digital Spy on death
 * The Arts Desk on death

And that's what I've got. ~Cheers, Ten  Ton  Parasol  18:41, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Where is Baxter?
One looks in vain for a section on lady's maid Baxter. Is there an editor here who will take on the task of remedying this peculiar omission? Hertz1888 (talk) 03:40, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

✅ - thanks to the IP editor who added the new section. Hertz1888 (talk) 03:09, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

For whom exactly was Siobbhan Finneran supposedly a Stand-in??
This was added to the color chart by an IP in June 2014.Mirawithani (talk) 16:36, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Misc
Edith's middle name: The printed programs used for the scene of Edith's nuptials in series 3 show Edith's middle name as Josephine. There are close-ups of these props in a bonus featurette on the dvd, which can be seen at this link http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1606375/board/nest/205140607?p=6&d=210493674#210493674 Netherfield (talk) 23:46, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Shouldn't there be an entry for Lady Rose MacClare? She's referenced in some of the other text, but could use an entry of her own. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keefdian (talk • contribs) 03:19, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

I don't believe Rose is Edith's first cousin. She is the daughter of Violet's niece. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.154.182.39 (talk) 20:22, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Here we go again
Interesting that some of you edit squirrels with OCD can't leave alone even a fairly innocuous comment in the TALK section. Why people sneer at the effort (to the detriment of all those who are conscientious)74.12.126.155 (talk) 23:53, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

George is Heir Presumptive, not Heir Apparent
At the end of the sixth paragraph of six of the Mary Crawley section it says that George is Heir Apparent. Not correct. As the Heir Apparent article says "An heir apparent is a person, of either sex, who is first in line of succession and cannot be displaced from inheriting by the birth of another person." It is possible that Robert Crawley could have a son. For example, if Cora were to die and Robert re-married to a younger woman of child-bearing age he could, again possibly sire a son. That son, as the oldest son of the title holder, would in fact displace George as the heir. I had a Twitter conversation with Alastair Bruce back in January when I asked if George would be styled as the Viscount Grantham and he explained that would not be the case as George is the Heir Presumptive, not Heir Apparent. I will make the change in the article. Eric Cable ! Talk 19:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

SPOILER ALERT!
Each character profile should be broken into series (seasons). Yes, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia in format, but it is also a practical reference. I came here only to catch up on who's who, and I was very disappointed to realize that some of the exposition I had been reading included the third season. (I'm writing this as the start of the third series has just been aired in the United States.)

Could also use a photo of each character or actor if available. Eplater (talk) 09:36, 8 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm not entirely sure what this means. Downton Abbey is a UK-originated show, and as such, the events on this page are depicted as they appear in their origin country. Not really sure what its US schedule has to do with it. If a person follows for instance The Bold and The Beautiful in the UK, and it is a year behind, should the page be updated once every country that has gotten the same incidents are up to speed? *rolls eyes* Yoryla (talk) 16:44, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Marigold's Surname
Should her surname be listed as Gregson, or Drewe? What source or evidence is their to give her the surname Gregson? Labelleflamme (talk) 14:43, 9 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Obviously She is, and will be, a Crawley. Why on earth would Edith give her a dead person's name. Plus, the implication of course is that it is not public knowledge that she is Gregson's daughter. So why on earth would she be given that name? Yoryla (talk) 16:46, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Spoiler alert
The descriptions given for the role of characters gives away events that will take place before Americans view the last of the series. For example to say that Lady Mary will become Lady Talbot, gives away that she will be married to Talbot & I wish I had been alerted that the description of characters might spoil the episodes that have not aired yet in America. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SLFrumpet (talk • contribs) 16:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)


 * And? I'm not entirely sure what the comments on this matter are supposed to mean on this page? Downton. Abbey. Is. A. UK-originated. Show. Period. As I have already commented previously, only the original timing of happenings matter. So, if Finland sees The Bold and The Beautiful a year late than the US, should the Wikipedia page be updated only when each country is up to speed? Never ever have I seen such ridiculous questions than on this page. Typical US sense of entitlement. This show is not made, or meant, for your country. Be grateful that you are even able to have a part of it. Yoryla (talk) 16:49, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Entries for Henry Talbot and Bertie Pelham?
Shouldn't there be character entries for Henry Talbot and Bertie Pelham? Both figured very extensively in the sixth season (and both ended up as husbands of two of the main characters). Don't they deserve their own entries amongst the "Crawley family" section? If the Duke of Crowborough gets his own entry (when he only appeared in one episode), then certainly they should have their own as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dahl 98 (talk • contribs) 21:37, 10 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Yes, they of course, and obviously, should be. Shame on not having them up already. They should be made immediately. Especially Bertie Pelham, as He is Edith's Husband, which is much more important than who is the other one's. Plus He is the Marquis of Hexham, meaning His rank is far above the others. Yoryla (talk) 16:50, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Medical journal article on Sybil Crawley's death
Found this, written by a fourth year medical student: If you use it, remember to follow WP:MEDRS and ask WikiProject Medicine if you're unsure. WhisperToMe (talk) 17:53, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
 * - Copy at the National Institutes of Health.

Trimming
I have started trimming the character descriptions to be much shorter. Is there a way to reduce the size of the "Cast" tables? Is the "Guest Cast" table really necessary? Queensferry572 (talk) 02:03, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I think what would help shift the tone of people editing the page would be to introduce commentary on the characters from published secondary sources, to show that the page should put more emphasis on what other people (meaning people who write editorials in newspapers and magazines, and academic journals if applicable) say WhisperToMe (talk) 00:02, 6 June 2020 (UTC)