Talk:List of Dragon Ball GT episodes

Tell Me
Someone tell me what the episodes are about, and, I'm just wandering, is the Dragon Ball GT series still on, and the date it aired on. I think it would be better. Is it possible to show the Super Sayian powers? http://www.myfavoritegames.com/dragonball-z/info/AttackList/0-B.htm Uzumaki Dude 02:29, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Special
I've tagged the special for merging here. It does not have any notability to stand alone, and no reason it needs its own article. Alternatively, it could also just be merged back to the main article. Thoughts? -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 15:45, 5 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, i believe it does need its own page because it was released on a stand-alone dvd and like all things that are released in this fashion, it should haves its OWN page on wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.64.178.71 (talk) 16:38, 6 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Why? Just because it was released on its own DVD does not mean it gets its own article. Per our Manual of Style, unless it is significantly different from the rest of the series, it goes with the rest. -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 18:08, 6 July 2008 (UTC)


 * It is a separate movie. Been released on DVD and had much ads in Japan. Keep SSJ 5 (talk) 17:22, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

The DVD Sets of GT
I have the second 'season' set..altho its not called a season set, its called 'Part 2' which does make more sense, considering its part 2 of the Baby Saga, as well as all of the Super 17 Saga and the Shadow Dragon Saga...I wish I knew when it released, but I do not, but it isn't TBA, I own it.--User:Chipmonk328


 * That's a different release entirely. The season sets are just starting to be released in 2008. What you have sounds like a bootleg. -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 20:08, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Renaming Again?
Since some feel we need to change the page around every time FUNimation releases something new, will there be a re-grouping of the episodes again if they release the Dragon Boxes for GT? With Z, they are using two of the original DVD books (14 in total) for every release. They are definitely not following saga or season divisions then. Will we need to re-group everything once everything releases? I mean, they are the TRUE way to release the series! I can't wait for the Dragon Boxes... I'm going to watch my Dragon Box movie 13 DVD now! DBZfan29 (talk) 16:55, 5 September 2009 (UTC)


 * We do not change the page everytime Funimation releases something new. The lists were rearranged to match Funimation's season releases. You don't like how they did them, complain to them. Will it be redone by the sets? Probably not. If they are just all the episodes without a redoing of the seasonal divisions, no. -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 17:58, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Resolution
What's the resolution of GT? It is 4:3 or 16:9? 720p? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.241.74.60 (talk) 05:28, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Nicktoons airdates
Do we really need them? --173.73.61.241 (talk) 00:35, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

We did them for the DBZ Kai series, so why not? Wikialexdx (talk) 04:19, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * This content has been disputed. Therefore please leave it off until the dispute is resolved. The dates are completely unnecessary. Only the first run aridates are needed. Actually, if you look the the DBZ Kai pages, only the original airdates are used. Those are the Nicktoons dates because Nicktoons was the original network that carried the series. You don't see Toonzai airdates for that reason. You don't see Cartoon Network airdates for the first eight seasons of Pokémon, you don't see Nicktoons airdates for Avatar: The Last Airbender and the millions of other shows later shown on Nicktoons. There is no reason to have the Nicktoons airdated listed in the table. Only the original run is needed. --Shadow (talk) 05:15, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

US Airdates for first saga
So, did they really release the Black Star saga after everything else? It establishes the following Baby saga enough that it actually makes a degree of sense. Without those episodes, I don't understand how anyone would be able to follow the rest of it. Rashkavar (talk) 04:52, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Amazon.Com is not a Reliable Source
We dont link to Amazon sales pages for references. I am removing all such references. If they come back I will be forced to flag as spam. Jay Dubya (talk) 19:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Unless you can demonstrate that Amazon is not a reliable source, the links must stay. While they may not be the best source because they are a retail website, they are not spam and calling them such is disruptive. And removing them without replacing them with another reliable source is equally disruptive. 24.149.117.220 (talk) 21:00, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I think Amazon.com is a reliable source for when something was released. Checking old WP:RSN discussions, it seems there was some concern over using Amazon.com as a source for release dates of things that haven't yet been released (since the release date might change), but the general opinion I saw was that they would be reliable for a release date of something that was already released.  As a large company selling the product, it would be reasonable to expect them to have the correct date of release.  Also, since the links are clearly being used as sources for information and not to try to drive sales, I don't think they could be considered spam. Calathan (talk) 21:44, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Here are links to previous discussions about whether Amazon.com is a reliable source.
 * Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 56
 * Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 21
 * Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 43
 * Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 114
 * Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 7
 * Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 115


 * The general consensus of all of these past discussions have been that Amazon.com is a reliable source to prove that certain items exists and for release/publication dates after the fact. However, upcoming dates are generally viewed as a crystal ball. But there is absolutely no consensus that the links to Amazon.com are "spam" when used as references. 24.149.117.220 (talk) 22:08, 1 April 2014 (UTC)


 * I agree with Calathan amazon.com is just being used for release dates information and has proven to be reliable. In this case though I feel it would be better to use (Funimation as a source). Clicking on the pictures will give you a page (Like this). - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 23:59, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * In japanese media, primary sources (official sites) direct readers to amazon pages, so if its beign hosted by some form of first party or reliable company, it is acceptable. Lucia Black (talk) 07:17, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Dragon Ball GT episodes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040927125905/http://www.animeondvd.com/news/article.php?article_view=342 to http://www.animeondvd.com/news/article.php?article_view=342

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:23, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

English Air Dates
Suggest changed these to American air dates if that's what they are. In Canada (YTV), the first episode of GT aired on September 10, 2004, which is earlier than the first date listed here. CRTC Logs Forum Buzz: New Anime on YTV this Fall AnimeOnDVD.com Also, in the body of the article itself, it has November 7, 2003 as the date it began on Cartoon Network. Perhaps remove these dates until they are confirmed.--Seanpaulk (talk) 00:37, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Dragon ball ZGT
Dragon ball ZGT download freedo 41.122.65.45 (talk) 14:41, 12 July 2024 (UTC)