Talk:List of Dukes of Braganza

Numbering and Peter III
Why isn't Peter III of Portugal included? And I removed the numberings because it is unneeded because it cost problems and beg the question if this is just copying English nobles' numbering system with no actual sources that numbered these dukes outside of wikipedia. Plus we jump from 16 to 18 with Pedro I and Maria II but ignore Miguel.--The Emperor&#39;s New Spy (talk) 01:18, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I am also changed the links on the first sections of the Dukes, using their title that they are currently on. We don't use Theodosius, Alphonse, or Ferdinand so James and John is unneccessary except where the current title is under a John, and translation is all but abandoned after John IV of Portugal.

On-going dispute
To participate and view an ongoing dispute concerning various aspects of articles pertaining to the Miguelist dukes, Maria Pia of Braganza, and the Braganza-Coburg articles, and an ongoing dispute between editors User:Anjo-Sozinho, User:Hebel, and myself, see here. Thank you, Cristiano Tomás (talk) 23:19, 21 June 2016 (UTC)