Talk:List of Folding@home cores

SHARPEN and Desmond
These cores are listed as inactive, but I'm not sure if that's true or not. I have gathered a little information about them together, but it seems to me like little is known about them. Be aware that the statements in the article on these cores is not complete. I don't have a whole lot of time at the moment to thoroughly hunt down things about them. Of course more information is welcome for all the cores, but I'm particularly hoping for more information on the Desmond and Sharpen cores. So if anyone has seen any legitimate information about them, don't hesitate to include it! :) Thanks. Jesse V. (talk) 04:31, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

SMP BigAdv Inactive?
As of 31st January 2015 the SMP BigAdv are no longer in use. Since this is just a version of the SMP core would this require a separate section under inactive? Tudalex (talk) 19:41, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Fahcore?
All this good info on Folding@home cores, and not once were they correctly referenced as a "fahcore" Well done there "Primary author of Folding@home article on Wikipedia." Primary editor of the week, at most. More like a glorified citation specialist. Let's see who's still updating this page in another 7 years...7im (talk) 22:32, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I apologize for any offense there 7im. I'm simply trying my best and I welcome further suggestions. If they are in fact named "fahcore" I'll make the change as you suggest. My goal is to simply make informative and encyclopedic articles about Folding@home and related articles, and I'm striving to do so correctly. I'm not sure what your problem is, I obviously don't know as much as you do about F@h and I'm trying to learn and do my part. Personally, I don't see all that much difference between "core" and "fahcore" but I'll make sure this is taken care of. A simple "By the way, the correct term is 'fahcore', please make this change" would have been just as effective. A bigger issue is actually more information about the cores, which seems much more scarce and is in my opinion a bigger stumbling block for this article rather than rather we use "core" or "fahcore". Nevertheless I'll do some more research and see about this change. I do in fact appreciate when you said that it was better to say "FAH" rather than "F@h" in the Folding@home article, and as you can see I made that change as well. I'm trying to do what I can here, sorry if I make a mistake somewhere. I welcome suggestions. My signature is not meant to brag or anything like that, as I put it there to distinguish myself a bit and indicate to those I helped that I have some knowledge with how F@h works, rather than someone who just joined. I've been missing your expertise on the forums, especially in light of the recent server events at Stanford. Best, Jesse V. (talk) 23:33, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * core and fahcore are interchangeable, with core being the common language term, fahcore being the more correct technical term. Early in the project, core was in common use.  In the last few years, with so many different cores, fahcore tends to be more common.  Aside, your youthful exuberance and significant improvements to fah wiki are both notable and appreciated. But this is not the appropriate place or time to school you on newbile offenses.  We'll talk more in 2012. 7im (talk) 00:51, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on List of Folding@home cores. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081202015556/http://p450.caltech.edu:80/sharpen/sharpenprojects.html to http://p450.caltech.edu/sharpen/sharpenprojects.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081201052516/http://p450.caltech.edu:80/sharpen/sharpenabout.html to http://p450.caltech.edu/sharpen/sharpenabout.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 02:39, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

added core a7, unsure of placement
I added some info about Core a7. I know it is multiprocessor so I added it under SMP, but perhaps this is incorrect. I'm hoping somebody who knows more about the project can help here. Proxyma (talk) 21:25, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on List of Folding@home cores. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6AqrEXY89?url=http://folding.stanford.edu/English/FAQ-gromacs to http://folding.stanford.edu/English/FAQ-gromacs
 * Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6AqqqVZ0r?url=http://folding.stanford.edu/English/FAQ-OpenSource to http://folding.stanford.edu/English/FAQ-OpenSource
 * Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6AqqzeD9x?url=http://folding.stanford.edu/English/FAQ-SMP to http://folding.stanford.edu/English/FAQ-SMP
 * Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6Aqr6ygeI?url=http://folding.stanford.edu/English/FAQ-ATI to http://folding.stanford.edu/English/FAQ-ATI
 * Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6Aqr6ygeI?url=http://folding.stanford.edu/English/FAQ-ATI to http://folding.stanford.edu/English/FAQ-ATI
 * Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6AqrEXY89?url=http://folding.stanford.edu/English/FAQ-gromacs to http://folding.stanford.edu/English/FAQ-gromacs

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:46, 25 December 2017 (UTC)