Talk:List of Galavant episodes

Plagiarized episode "summaries"
It has been contested that the episode summaries of season 1, episodes 1–4 constitute plagiarism and possibly copyright violation from the official press releases, as found here and here. This is clearly the case as most phrases coincide in structure and wording and even verbatim. Here is a sentence-by-sentence breakdown:

This should make it clear that those summaries are not your own words but indeed plagiarism. I removed them once again.–Dark Cocoa Frosting (talk) 14:14, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

The title of this episode refers to...
So, i'm not really sure what to say, but i don't want any single editor to come along and remove the information i've added without others even having a chance to see it and consider whether or not it's noteworthy. i feel like the wordplays, especially those which are parodies of specific pre-existing entities, deserve mention, similar to the way some articles on Wikipedia discuss the production and development of a film/show (including preliminary titles, because they reflect the way the filmmakers were thinking at the time--and if preliminary titles are noteworthy, how much more so information about finalized titles).

Just my two cents. --71.121.143.118 (talk) 06:46, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * So, this is all your own original research? Unsourced content is not supported on Wikipedia, and if you feel that this was deliberately the case, then you need sources to back up your claims for the titles. Alex&#124;The&#124;Whovian ? 06:50, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ...Letter of the law, yes, i suppose "verifiability over truth" is on your side (for now). But i think it would be more in keeping with the spirit of Wikipedia to add [citation needed] tags to what i said (should've done that myself), rather than going with a version that leaves those things unsaid.  i have a hard time believing those titles' similarity to the things i mentioned could possibly be coincidental, and neglecting to mention them feels like a disservice to readers who might not realize, "Oh, this seems to have been named after something."
 * Can't stay; will return (hopefully with 3rd party sources--or better yet, other editors with 3rd sources, because isn't that how wikis work, that none of us have to do everything?) --71.121.143.118 (talk) 07:29, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * No. Typically, anything flagged with [citation needed] should either be sourced or deleted on sight. It is not in the "spirit of Wikipedia" to add information and instantly tag them yourself. That is extremely poor editing. Episodes aren't added then tagged as citation needed - they are sourced straight away. You may be right, the episode titles may draw directly from what you've added. But if you are going to add the content, then yes, you are the one that has to add the sources. Alex&#124;The&#124;Whovian ? 07:32, 19 January 2016 (UTC)