Talk:List of Grove Plays

Moving and cite style
I moved the article back to List of Grove Plays because that's what I intend it to be: a list. I copied the style of several WP:Featured lists which begin with a short bit about the subject. If I had wanted to write about the phenomenon of Grove Plays the article would just as likely be entitled Grove Play (singular, not plural). The citation style is lifted directly from a FL. I'm removing the cite tag. Binksternet (talk) 00:01, 28 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I just removed two new tags from the same editor: "notability" and "primarysources". There are, in the references, several third party mentions of this play series, including the Ogden ref, the Domhoff ref, the Newman and the Taylor refs. These establish both notability and relieve us of the sting of relying on primary sources. Binksternet (talk) 04:30, 29 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm seeing some mentions of this from some well known newspapers, can they be used as references as well? Over half of the current list of references are primary sources, nearly all of the remainder are from a single source (the Garnett book).  Some additional references from well known newspapers such as the LA Times, San Francisco Chronicle, or New York Times, particularly those that are about the organization itself, rather than a review of a specific play, will help establish notability here.--RadioFan (talk) 11:35, 29 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay, cool; I can find some more newspaper and magazine articles. Binksternet (talk) 13:43, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. Binksternet (talk) 16:55, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Title
Any issue with renaming this "Grove Play". While primarily a list, the intro provides good information on the plays and their history. Readers are more likely to be searching on Grove Play or Grove Plays than the current title.


 * The style of having good information at the head of the list is something I copied from several WP:Featured lists such as List of Boston Red Sox managers, Timeline of prehistoric Scotland, and Orange Prize for Fiction. To me, the primary reason for the article is the table of annual plays: a list. Binksternet (talk) 13:43, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

18:01, 3 June 2011 (UTC)~ Hi all; I had a question about the article--in the year 1991, weren't women allowed to participate in Skull and bones? For, in a seperate article (I think it was the one about Yale or something), it said that women were finally allowed to participate in Skull and Bones from the year 1991 onwards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.19.134.122 (talk) 18:01, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Grove Plays. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101019005618/http://americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/ah/1980/4/1980_4_81.shtml to http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/ah/1980/4/1980_4_81.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:28, 25 December 2017 (UTC)