Talk:List of Hanbali scholars

202.65.145.4
sorry for the suspicion, but the entry i made adds to the page and should not be considered vandalism. the IP you entered is a proxy IP. I have registered and for some reason some of my edits show as the IP i am on not my user name. Any advice as to how to stop this will be appreciated wilis.azm

Based on othe entries by 202.65.145.4, this one is suspect.Mikereichold 06:36, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Wahabi tampering?
It seems that salafist's are trying to list their schoolars amoung the hanbali schoolars. I suggest at least some of the schoolars be removed until further verification. Even though salafist may renounce sufism, the fact is that Abdul Qadir Al Jilani is a well known sufi "master" of the Qadiri Sufi order. It can be said with fairness that he is an hanbali schoolar.(Not so sure about the rest, especially those with najdi titles at the end)

User:imranal 16 October 2006

they are all hanbalis
all the notables mentioned in this list are hanbalis and their biographies are found and well documented in Hanbali works on tabaqat (biographical levels). Hanbali 00:36, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Contradiction nr.1
" Muhammad b. Humaid al-Najdi (d. 1295) – A Hanbali jurist, traditionist, historian, and an ardent enemy of Ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab’s followers, in spite of being a student of Aba Butain and a great admirer of Ibn Taymiyah and Ibn al-Qayyim. He is the author of al-Suhub al-Wabila ‘ala Dhara’ih al-Hanabilah, which is a continuation of Dhail Tabaqat al-Hanabila of Ibn Rajab. "

According to the breif bio of Ibn Humaid(Muhammad b. Humaid al-Najdi ), he was the Imam of the Grand Mosque of Mecca. If ibn Humaid was "an ardent enemy of Ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab’s followers", he would never had been given the posistion he had accuired in Mecca. So he could not have been a so called enemy of wahabism.

One side he is being referred as anti-wahabist, while on the other side he was the Imam of the Grand Mosque of Mecca. Is the contradiction understood?

imranal, 24 October 2006


 * You are confusing Abdullah ibn Humaid (a contemporary scholar circa 1400H) with Muhammad ibn Humaid (d. 1295), get your facts straight before filling up the talk page. Wilis.azm

I appologize for the mistake, however the link directing to Muhammad b. Humaid al-Najdi is in fact directing to Ibn Humaid. That is how I got confused. However there are still certain scholars who need to to be "investigated" such that it can be verified if they belong to the school of thought of Ahmad ibn Hanbal and not salafism, unless it can be verified that salafism equals hanbalism, which is appenretly not true. imranal

The article is 100% factual - I am the author
Everything mentioned in this article is factual and based on Hanbali biographical works, such as Dhayl 'ala tabaqat al-hanabila, mukhtasar tabaqat and tashil al-sabila. If anyone has any objections, then please give us your educated and well-informed opinion instead of baseless scepticism Hanbali 00:56, 18 January 2007 (UTC)


 * "I am the author" = Original Research. This sort of work can be on Wikibooks but not on Wikipedia.-- LeflymanTalk 01:40, 18 January 2007 (UTC)