Talk:List of Hangul jamo

Comments
"Code points in orange will be added in Unicode 5.1." This doesn't appear to have happened. If I understand the Unicode website correctly, the characters in question have been accepted for inclusion in some future version of Unicode. However, I don't think they were added to Unicode 5.1 which was just released. I'm not completely sure I'm right about this.Chris Johnson (talk) 20:51, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Corrected. Actually the quote you used above was just my estimation; I thought they would be added in Unicode 5.1 that time. However I'm pretty they will be added in the next version of Unicode since it is formally "accepted (stage 5 of ISO process)." --­ (talk) 21:36, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, it's been changed. Currently they're on stage 6. Now I can really 100 percent sure that they WILL be added in the next version of Unicode. --­ (talk) 21:38, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey, Unicode 5.2 was released.--118.217.213.175 (talk) 02:37, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Changing where characters link to
I notice the links don't seem to make much sense at all - ᇞ, for example, just links to the page on Hangul without any sort of link to the section that mentions it, whereas ㅿ just links to the character tables (despite not being included there at all.)

Should we link to the Wiktionary article on them where such articles exist, or should we link to the "Letters" section of the Hangul article? Tymewalk (talk) 23:20, 6 November 2017 (UTC)