Talk:List of Kamen Rider Den-O characters

Hana is an imajin??
I've watched episode three and I can almost swear I never heard any mention to the fact Hana was a imajin herself. Doesn't she just say "he's the owner of this Den-liner, someone with whom I have a contract, to chase of the imajin." Then Ryoutaro asks the owner about all this imajin, time-travel, Den-O stuff and he replies "there aren't really people who understand it. Even Hana-kun here doesn't know everything. But, whether you know it or not, the flow of time will not stop. Isn't that right?". Then he talks about the tickets and the pass, but that's not relevant to this discussion. Am I missing something?

EDIT: I checked the Japanese version of Wikipedia and found nothing to that effect either, but rather something similar to what I said before. -- Ishikawa Minoru 14:40, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * There's nothing on this page that mentions Hana as an Imagin...— Ryūlóng ( 竜 龍 ) 20:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh. It was someone putting their own speculation about the series. Don't worry about that.— Ryūlóng ( 竜 龍 ) 20:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

What is the owner eating?
I was wondering what the owner was eating so maybe we could add the fact that he has a habit of making the flag fall lastly on his dish. I think it might be rice of some sort.(68.92.119.122 02:56, 1 March 2007 (UTC))

Edit: I thought the owner was called Hana. Not too smart of me.
 * It's some sort of rice dish. That's what was said (afaik).— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 03:51, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Mysterious Man Picture
I have a screenshot of the mysterious man that can be found here. I made it as part of a discussion board outside of wikipedia, but I can make another one without the player at the bottom, if you guys would like to add it. --WarriorofZarona 18:19, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * It's not entirely necessary to have an image of him yet, I believe.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 19:31, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

"Previously portrayed" mentions
The reason I have been trying to fix a lot of these character pages lately are because the "previously portrayed" bits that have been added to them. These bits are trivia, and should be avoided per WP:TRIVIA. It is a violation of WP:OR and WP:SYN to post them on there because it has nothing to do with the pages. In addition, they did not have any sources, and the information can just be found on the particular actors' pages. My apologies to anyone inconvenienced or worried about the state of these pages. OuendanL (talk) 22:57, 18 May 2016 (UTC)