Talk:List of Kinnikuman characters

Pictures deleted?
Why were all the pictures I uploaded to the main page deleted, along with Yosaku and Nakano's on their personal pages? Does anyone have copies of them, or do I have to go through the trouble of actually screencapping 'em again?-theOrgg
 * Because there are many anal retentive jerks here on Wikipedia that get off on deleting images. I also wish you hadn't removed some of the pictures I uploaded because they were marked as "orphaned" when you did that and were deleted by the aforementioned jerks. Evan1975 00:45, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

I didn't remove them-- I just moved them to the bottom with the match wins/losses as they wouldn't warp anything. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheOrgg (talk • contribs) 15:08, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Game Characters
What about Bone Cold or Skullduggery, are they there cause I've only seen them in Kinnikuman Generation. If they and other characters like that maybe we could make another line about games only characters. SoundPound500000 November 8, 2006 7:38 a.m.

Alphabetical Order?
I'm wondering if we should "go alphabetical" like the Japanese article, with hyperlink anchors to the different letters. Evan1975 22:41, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

I dunno. Is there anyway we can separate the "2-3 Sentence Summary" listings for the characters with their own pages from the alphabetical listing? Seigi Choujin 23:10, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

I wouldn't know. Evan1975 05:06, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Pandaman
I'd like to see some proof that Eiichiro Oda submitted the original Pandaman from the early days of Kinnikuman. Not only can I not find evidence to support this on Japanese websites, he would've had to have been like 4 or 5 years old. He did create the Pandaman that appeared in the "Kinnikuman 77 no Nazo" book and One Piece, but this Pandaman never appeared in any Kinnikuman canon. Evan1975 05:06, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm going to put it back the way I had it soon if I don't get any sources. It would be neat trivia if it were true that a 4-year old Oda made the original Pandaman, but I can't find anything on this.  The Japanese wiki says nothing about it. Evan1975 04:49, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Kaijū?
Should we put the various kaiju monsters in here? Evan1975 02:20, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

I can't think of any logical reason why not. Seigi Choujin 02:59, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, they're in the Japanese wiki. I just thought that perhaps because they weren't here, perhaps they weren't wanted. Evan1975 22:11, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Pictures Finished(?)
IF any pictures are missing that were once there (or you find one missing the thing, tell me (or put the label on it for me!) and I'll upload the image if I can find it again. -TheOrgg

Renovation
I am in the process of rearranging this page and creating a few additional Character Lists pages, so if you see a character's info listed here and on another page, for the time being please leave it alone, I'll be getting to it soon. Thank you. Seigi Choujin 15:55, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use images of each character
The use of fair use images for each character in lists like this is not supported either in policy or guidelines. Please refer to NFC. I've removed 35 fair use images from this article. Please find a montage from the copyright holder (not one user created here). Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 16:34, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Page Renovation
I noticed the page was in disrepair, without a significant edit in years. So, I tried to fix it up to the best of my ability. I added characters from the more recent revival series, and restructured the page to a more traditional Protagonist - Antagonist structure instead of the chronological structure it was originally. I erased duplicate characters, and expanded on most of the characters, as a large portion of them had only been single-line summaries. On the other hand, I tried to make more concise the long descriptions that had been given to secondary or tertiary characters. I did not touch the Kaiju, anime-exclusive and minor character sections very much, since I am not as knowledgeable on the matter. I am sure it's not perfect, but I hope it is at least a bit of an improvement.Fikko3107 (talk) 20:38, 3 April 2019 (UTC)