Talk:List of Louis Theroux documentaries

Italics
I think the question of whether or not a doc should have italics really has to do with how it's published. Here's a source re: having it stay italicized: It's sold independently. Also the main article for the doc is italicized.-- Shibboleth ink (♔ ♕) 09:06, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

LA Stories
On the bbc iplayer By Reason of Insanity is listed as the 23rd special so LA stories should be in a separate section.MB1972 (talk) 17:24, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Wrong Susan linked?
I unlinked.

https://ballotpedia.org/Susan_Austin

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/49882974/ns/us_news-life/t/brothel-owner-becomes-nevadas-newest-politician/#.VsOU83WLS1I

Possible that she and he are both politicians, but in different states, Maine and Nevada? comp.arch (talk) 21:36, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt22393396/episodes/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 21:22, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Too many to list. see links in edit summary. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 00:33, 20 September 2023 (UTC)