Talk:List of Monster Buster Club characters

Proposed deletion
This article is a joke. I've proposed that it be deleted. It's quality is unforgivably low, and any attempts made to improve it are always reverted.--Goodbye Galaxy (talk) 23:51, 16 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I second the motion. Starting from scratch, and using a pre-existing format (again, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_characters_from_The_Simpsons) is the only way to improve this. Please use proper grammar, and proper encyclopedic style. We do not need huge biographies with lengthy in-text references to episodes in a LIST of characters. C.anguschandler (talk) 23:54, 16 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Can I ask why the deletion flag was removed by Angsc09? As far as I can see, s/he is not exactly innocent in this affair, and has not contacted anyone about the issue. The template states: You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason. but I do not feel it has. The origional issue still stands, and Angsc09 has not made any attempt to resolve the dispute. Laurielegit (talk) 19:45, 21 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Angsc09, you really need to participate in the discussion on the talk page. We know you're trying to make the page better, but you also need to respect that the page currently has some issues re: relevance and length. You removed the deletion flag without discussion, which is not cool. Please reply with how you are planning to reduce this article's length and improve its relevance. C.anguschandler (talk) 23:01, 22 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Instead of deleteion i suggest this get merged into the main article, this show is not notable enough to have it own character page, however in teh future if the main page gets to large i suggest splitting it out, i have rmeove unsoruced and pov information and anything that not keeping it neutral, if you agree to merging this to main page i will do it later this week.--Andrewcrawford (talk) 19:06, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah, if you can cut it down even more, it could probably be merged into the main article. Maybe only the actual MBC characters, not the aliens or enemies should be included. C.anguschandler (talk) 21:03, 8 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Before i cut it down more i was goign to do a bit of research i certainly think 80% is irrelevent to the article--Andrewcrawford (talk) 23:19, 8 May 2009 (UTC) I think in the future once the main article is expanded then this page will be neede edbut the main page is so small so it isnt needed jsut now

Constant Reverts
Angsc09, I made a good-faith attempt to set an example for how I think the other characters should be written with the first one. My text was substantially similar to the previous text, but condensed to an appropriate length and with long tangents and improper references removed. Rather than engaging in a debate on the issue, you chose to revert. Why? C.anguschandler (talk) 23:04, 22 April 2009 (UTC)