Talk:List of One Day International cricket records/Archive 1

Sachin's Career infornmation
It is written that he has played from 1989 and till part is empty. It should be 2012, Since he took retirement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanchit Chatty Mital (talk • contribs) 07:54, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Team wins, losses and ties
The "Matches played" is displaying a completely incorrect information for India. Someone seems to be at their creative best. Need to bring it under control --Amit g v (talk) 13:10, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

More specifically, the percentages. They look to be completely out of kilter with the actual amount of won games - look at South Africa for example. 210 wins, 341 matches - should be a percentage of 61.58. Even if counting ties and no-results as half-wins, that'd be 217.5 wins in 341 matches, a percentage of 63.78. Or if counting ties as half-wins and no-results as nothing, it's 62.31. Or if you count no-results as half-wins and ties as nothing, it's 63.05. None of these fit with the cited figure of 63.44. Help! Sam Vimes 15:45, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I recall checking this table about two weeks ago and the matches played and the percentages matched the source then. It appears that User:67.165.63.188 was doing some creative editing earlier today.  The last updated date is 29Nov, so it's due for an update from the source anyway. I'll do that tomorrow if someone else hasn't in the meantime. -- &mdash;Moondyne 16:02, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I can't figure it out, could it be CricInfo are playing silly buggers?. Zimbabwe have won 70 of 273 completed - 25.64%. Cricinfo have them at 25.27%, so even if they're somehow incorporating ties, they're dragging Zimbabwe's percent down - from 25.64. Huh?
 * I've been updating this in the short breathers between series, Pakistan v England has just finished, so I'll fix it up. Same as the Test records, I guess, ties and N/R ignored. --Paul 16:27, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see what they've done now. The ties are added to completed games tally, but add nothing to the wins tally. So Zim are 70 wins from 277 games. Doesn't make sense to me. --Paul 16:30, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

From Cricinfo: Team                ODIs      Won     Lost     Tied       NR      Win % South Africa         342      210      117        5       10      63.25 Zimbabwe             285       70      203        4        8      25.27 So, for RSA: 210/(342-10) = 63.25%, and for ZIM: 70/(285-8) = 25.27% -- &mdash;Moondyne 17:04, 21 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Right. Too clever by half for me, I suppose. I think this definition needs to be defined under the table itself. Sam Vimes 17:14, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

But the inclusion of ties is off kilter, either they're half a win, or be excluded all together. They're being counted as losses by CI, a team with 10 wins and 5 ties will have the same percent as a team with 10 wins and 5 losses. We should either use (wins/(wins+losses)*100), same as the Test table, or (as I would have done) draws and ties half a win.--Paul 17:26, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

I changed the percents to (wins/(wins+losses)*100), same as the Test table - however just poking around, I noticed that CricInfo are now using the ties-as-losses in the Test figures too. So the Test percents are different to CI as well now - but I think this is OK, it makes more sense.--Paul 05:10, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Paul, I'm not so sure it's a good idea to have our own formula that's different from CI, as future editors will undoubtedly wonder where the percentages came from and then we'll have to have another discussion about the logic and justification behind each method. It also makes updating the table that little bit harder as you've got to get a calculator out rather than just copying. I think I understand the concerns you have about the logic of excluding no-result matches but think for the sake of consistency with the source it'd be better to use "wins/(played - nr)". -- &mdash;Moondyne 08:29, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, OK, but I still reckon they're doing it funny. I sent them off a comment about it, see if they reply --Paul 09:54, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * A dumb question, but what is a no-result match? -- &mdash;Moondyne 08:37, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * One of these - the team batting second has to face 15 overs (is it still 15 overs?) for a result. If not, the stats still count, but there's no result. --Paul 09:54, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Including ties makes sense to me: a tied match is a completed match. The percentage of wins is the percentage of completed matches (which thus excludes no results) which are won. Ditto percentage of lost matches and percentage of ties. There have only been a handful of tied ODIs - are we really that concerned about the decimal places? In any event, we should be able to avoid confusion by explaining our methodology in the article. -- ALoan (Talk) 12:22, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * As I said up the page, currently the win percent of a 1W 0L 1T record is the same as 1W 1L 0T. Simplistically, they've both won 1 from 2, but clearly the former is a better record. Which isn't reflected by CI or us. But as you say, in practice it's not going to matter --Paul 13:06, 22 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Indeed, but in either case, the team did win only one of its two matches, and it did not win the other. Saying how many matches a team has won out of how many it has played doesn't tell you anything about how many matches have ended in a loss or tie or no result.  Yes, a tie is a better result than a loss, but a tie is not a win, or half a win.  Saying that the first team has won 75% of its matches (1½ out of 2) would be at best confusing and at worst wrong. -- ALoan (Talk) 14:00, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * But nonetheless, better reflects the team's performance. That's why in league style competitons, e.g. most types of football, and even in cricket - the Sheffield Shield, a tie gets points, traditionally equivalent to half-a-win (though in many soccer comps nowadays, it's a third). A points table doesn't fit the model here (as the number of games played by each team aren't equal), but the principle remains the same. --Paul 14:30, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * As you say, the points in a league competition for a win or a draw and the percentage of wins here are different things. I agree that a tie is a better result than a loss, but neither is a win. The percentage of wins is an important but coarse measure of a team's performance - for example, it does not measure how wide the margin of victory was, or how good or bad the opponents were. -- ALoan (Talk) 16:35, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

I'm coming into this discussion a bit late because somehow I was watching List of One-day International records but not Talk:List of One-day International records. I didn't think that was possible, but it happened.

Anyway, I'm convinced that ties shouldn't count towards the wins or losses. Counting a tie the same as a loss is just wrong. So the formula should be W/(W+L). The alternative of (W+T/2)/(W+L+T) is OK, but seems more complicated to explain.

Stephen Turner (Talk) 15:43, 22 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Well, as long as we explain what we are doing, fine: the former of your two alternatives is much better to my mind. But we will end up diagreeing with Cricinfo, it seems.  -- ALoan (Talk) 16:35, 22 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Disagreeing with Cricinfo doesn't bother me. Do other people regard that as a problem? Stephen Turner (Talk) 16:46, 22 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Apart from the fact that there's 22 percentages to be calculated, no, not really. We don't have to copy every statistician if we disagree with their measures. Sam Vimes 16:55, 22 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Doesn't worry me either, provided we make it clear what we are doing. It would be nice to have a source that agrees with us, though, to avoid original research.  -- ALoan (Talk) 17:00, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Ha, here's a source that agrees with me... it's me! I stopped updating, but I might start again --Paul 17:04, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Um...a simple mathematical calculation is original research? I thought that'd be more like "research that consists of collecting and organizing information from existing primary and/or secondary sources is strongly encouraged." (my emphasis). It's a bit like saying this list is original research because nobody has ever presented it in exactly this format before... Sam Vimes 17:06, 22 December 2005 (UTC)


 * "the only way to show that you are not doing original research is to cite sources who discuss material that is directly related to the article, and to stick closely to what those sources say." (emphasis added) On the other hand, the sources give the raw numbers, so manupulation of those numbers ought to be OK, I suppose, so long as it does not amount to "novel narrative or historical interpretation". -- ALoan (Talk) 20:24, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Howzstat! does it yet another way, Australia's win% a mere 45%. Literally true, but doesn't usefully portray reality, IMO. --Paul 17:24, 22 December 2005 (UTC)


 * That Howstat link is Tests! 45% is pretty amaxing, since the next four are all between 30 and 35%. -- ALoan (Talk) 20:24, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

What is the definition of "successful"?
NZ just tied England (2007/02/20). If a tie is "successful" then this would make the list of highest successful run chases at #3. Should we add it or perhaps create a new table for highest drawn run chases?202.13.210.23 (talk) 06:23, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Move?
For people unfamiliar with Cricket the Title looks weird. Wouldn't a move to list of One-day International cricket records be appropriate? Donar Reiskoffer 07:49, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * People unfamiliar with cricket still won't know what it means. Unless another sport starts playing ODIs, best left as is, sez I.--Paul 13:38, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

New record?
Fastest century by an Indian: Virat Kohli (52 balls) in Jaipur against Australia. Matthew Hayden batted for the whole 50 overs and got 181*, the highest Australian individual total in a ODI, how many other batsmen have batted the whole 50 overs and stayed not out with a century plus a lot more? Surely this kind of record has to go in somewhere, not being the highest Aus. total but staying in for 50 overs and getting 181. The record could possibly be 'Individuals batting whole 50 overs making a century' or something like that. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 60.224.17.61 (talk) 11:09, 20 February 2007 (UTC).


 * It's not that unique. Gary Kirsten made 188* v UAE and The Great SACHIN TENDULKAR scored 200* through 50 overs. So they're on the list of highest individual innings Sam Vimes | Address me 11:36, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

There needs to be a ... List of fastest 150?? List of fastest 200s?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.208.252.38 (talk) 22:18, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Top 5 World Largest Sixes 1. Albie Morkel 124 mitre  2011 2. Shahid Afride 121 mitre 2013 3. Yuvraj Singh 119 mitre  2007 4. Chris Gayle  112 mitre  2011 5. Misbah Ul Haq 110 mitre 2007  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Faisalkhan123 (talk • contribs) 17:44, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Lowest Totals
Bermudas 45 against England at Kingstown, St Vincent & the Grenadines figures in the Lowest Team Totals list. It shouldn't figure there, since that was a Warmup match & they are not official matches.


 * Thanks. You are right and I have removed it. When you are certain that something like this is incorrect, feel free to correct it yourself. Tintin 07:48, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

In this record the second lowest score ie canade v/s srilanks match is shown as played in year 1975, but actualy it was played in 2003

Saurabhsengar (talk) 05:45, 26 February 2010 (UTC)Saurabh Sengar

Bug in software
You write 413 and it shows 513, why ??

See Highest score, World Cup, one day - India Vs Bermuda

--59.93.243.64 18:08, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Bug in software or just plane carelessness: on 19th March 2012 Sachin Tendulkar is shown as having played 451, 452, 453 and 462 ODI matches - which is the correct figure? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.85.193.2 (talk) 23:33, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

How should we handle WC games?
I suggest that, instead of writing "WC" next to the season date [e.g. 2007 (WC)], we wikilink the date to the relevant world cup article. That is, under "season", we'll write 2007, yielding 2007. Alternatively, we can link to the relevant Wikinews article, like this one. Mi kk er (...) 07:41, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Most runs in an over...
I started to put together a list of the top 5 most expensive overs in ODI history (like we have for tests) and would appreciate some help. See User:Mikker/ToDo/Most_runs_in_an_over for the draft; I copied and pasted the test version and finished up until Boucher & Kallis's 30 runs (i.e. =2 number three). Mi kk er (...) 15:28, 21 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Visited the particular page. Does not seem to be updated with the content here. What kind of help are you looking for? - InTeGeR13 19:36, 5 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I started the list off but was a bit daunted by what still needed to be done. I'd appreciate help on finishing the list. Mi kk er (...) 06:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Removed section
I have removed a section listing the largest victory margins (by runs) because we don't have a reference for it and it's therefore WP:OR. Additionally, there is also the pragmatic issue of keeping such a list up to date: unless we have a reliable external source, someone has to do manual (and OR) calculations on a regular basis. Mi kk er (...) 06:26, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Flag of East and Central Africa Cricket Conference.svg
The image Image:Flag of East and Central Africa Cricket Conference.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --07:03, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Wrong flags in section for most career centuries
Flags of certain players are wrongly mentioned in the section "Most career centuries" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.97.7.213 (talk) 06:09, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Spring clean
Might be worth giving this list a little bit of TLC. The lead could do with expansion, and there's scope for a lot of the tables to be sortable. In some cases the "rank" column is unnecessary. For instance in the "Team wins, losses and ties" table; saying that Afghanistan are "the highest ranked" is OR. Listing teams in order of percentage wins, with Afghanistan at the top, is not. WFCforLife (talk) 18:26, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * List of Test cricket records went through a refurbishing last August, so it may be worth looking at that list for ideas on how to improve this one. Dabomb87 (talk) 18:34, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Requesting protection
Please semi protect this article ASAP. Too much vandalism.--Abhishek Jacob (talk) 13:10, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, the  tag is for requesting uncontroversial changes to already edit protected articles and not to actually request page protection for them. You can file protection requests by going here but please read the Protection policy first. Regards, Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) -  16:06, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Priorities wrong?
Why is the most number of runs scored over a career not included in this page while the highest strike rate is included??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.180.249.38 (talk) 05:41, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Lowest score of team
srilanka v/s cannada match was played on 2003 not 1975 it was a match of 2003 worldcup —Preceding unsigned comment added by Saurabhsengar (talk • contribs) 14:48, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Fastest Fifty
There are currently 5 players who scored half-centuries in 19 balls, but only Mark Boucher is mentioned. Shouldn't the other players be added to the list? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neo 1in (talk • contribs) 10:55, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

England/India
England and India's 338-run tie needs to be added as the second highest-scoring tie ever. But the page is protected so I can't. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.6.96.22 (talk) 22:23, 27 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Done. Feudonym (talk) 03:32, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Edit request from Manojjames, 25 March 2011
Dear Sir or Madam, There are many informations that are not current to the time.

Manojjames (talk) 13:38, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: you'll have to be more specific for someone to help you. Please provide the exact text you wish to be replaced and the text with which you want to replace it along with reliable sources backing up said changes. Thanks, — Bility (talk) 16:49, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * User:Justwl has made a substantial revision to the page, hopefully alleviating your concerns. — Bility (talk) 20:29, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Can someone update the dates of the citations?
Otherwise you have anomalies like the Largest successful run chases a ODI having entry number 4 in 2010-11, but the cite is from 2009. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.197.91.3 (talk) 20:29, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Error in Fastest 50, ground and year
There is a error in the Fastest 50 list. Can someone who is adept at making wiki edits please edit it.

In the first entry, the name of the ground and the year are incorrect. Sanath's fastest fifty was scored in 1996 in Singapore, not 2008 karachi.

Please delete this note once the edit is made. 92.237.109.34 (talk) 18:40, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Edit request on 8 December 2011
Change needed in Highest innings totals: In the ODI between India vs WI at Indore on 8-Dec-2011, India has scored 418-5 which is 5th highest score in ODI

RaviBramha (talk) 12:43, 8 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Do you have a source for this? --Jnorton7558 (talk) 22:41, 8 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Please check . This source is already part of the article, but new record is now updated in the article RaviBramha (talk) 06:59, 9 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I am making this as answered since someone has made this change already RaviBramha (talk) 07:12, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Edit request on 8 December 2011
Please Change the Ranks Columns of Highest innings totals table. Currently the row is showing, 4= 	418–5 (50 overs) 	 India v West Indies 	Indore 	2011–12 Please change the 4= to 4 and 4= in the next row to 5 and 5 in the next row to 6

Ajayambre88 (talk) 13:22, 8 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Do you have a source for this? --Jnorton7558 (talk) 22:41, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Edit request on 11 December 2011
Fastest fifty: Current: Pakistan v Sri Lanka Should be: Sri Lanka v Pakistan

Magantygk (talk) 00:53, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Is there a reason behind switching the order? --Jnorton7558 (talk) 19:29, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Semi-protected (again)
I semi-protected the page indefinitely, since it appears to suffer continuously from the sort of anon vandalism/graffiti (changing a record-holder's name, or changing a record to some outrageously high value) that does a serious disservice to readers - unlike many articles, where vandalism is often easy to distinguish from good content, even by the uninitiated. I do not intend "indefinitely" to mean "for ever" - at some point it may be worth removing protection again to see whether problems of anon vandalism have diminished. If anyone has any comments about this, please let me know. --RobertG ♬ talk 09:49, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 24 July 2012
✅

Exley140 (talk) 11:56, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for those edits, you must have worked hard on them. The ones I checked seemed correct, so I moved your edits bodily into the article proper here, and removed them from this talk page. Welcome to Wikipedia! --RobertG ♬ talk 12:22, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Records of Wikipedia
Wicket Keeper is an important player of the cricket. I think that there should be also wicket keeper records. It is an advise. --Jozoisis (talk) 07:55, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 23 December 2012
Rjnshwiki (talk) 07:12, 23 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: No request. ⋘ HueSatLum ?&thinsp;❢ ⋙ 15:20, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

custom for writing names
re: Captaincy Records why are Fleming, Jayawardene and a couple of others listed with just their surname? Ballchef (talk) 12:56, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

A question really?
Has any team scored three century partnerships in one innings except NZ V Eng recently? 219.89.117.64 (talk) 21:57, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Edit request on 28 July 2013
There is an error regarding certain figures in the section "Individual Records (Wicket-Keeping)". In most dismissals table for player Moin Khan the dismissals column has a value 287 where 212 are catches and 75 are stumps. In Most catches table this figure for Moin khan changes to 214 catches and also in Most stumping table the stumping figures for Moin khan are recorded as 73. So there are conflicts in the figures.

Umair tariq29 (talk) 01:07, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Not done: Thanks for pointing out the conflict. An interested editor may take it from here or you can determine what the change is that is required to correct this and open a new edit request. Please be sure to include a reliable source for the change. Thanks, Celestra (talk) 04:28, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Error: Highest Individual Score
It's still held by an Australian: Belinda Clark, 229* vs Denmark at the 1997 Women's World Cup in Mumbai. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.210.22.178 (talk) 17:32, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you: yes indeed, see List of women's One Day International cricket records. --RobertG ♬ talk 11:02, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

third highest score in ODI Cricket by rohit sharma . 209 of 158 balls
Third highest score in ODI in cricket by Rohit Sharma(IND) Rohit Sharma 209 of 158 balls.

Match : india vs australia (2-11-2013) at bengaluru(india)

Sharpspecial.jain7 (talk) 14:17, 2 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. --Stfg (talk) 14:50, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Edit request, 2 November 2013
Fastest fifty Glenn Maxwell 18 balls

219.90.160.102 (talk) 14:19, 2 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. --Stfg (talk) 14:50, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The information has now been added and the article seems up to date. StAnselm (talk) 19:45, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Saeed Anwar's name in "Most Centuries" list does not appear at all, please correct this.
Pakistan's Saeed Anwer scored 29 centuries from 247 matches in ODI's, his name is totally missing from list and should appear above Sourav Ganguly. Please correct this. Check out this source:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syed_Anwar — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.123.169.215 (talk) 17:25, 14 November 2013 (UTC)


 * He scored 20 ODI centuries. His wikipedia article was wrong. See here. Jevansen (talk) 21:48, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Sachin leading run taker
Sachin leading run taker period should be changed from 1989-2012 to 1989-2013

Freeznet2012 (talk) 11:26, 21 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: note that this page is for ODI records. According to his cricinfo page, his last ODI was India v Pakistan at Dhaka, Mar 18, 2012. That source also supports the figures in the table entry. --Stfg (talk) 14:56, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 5 March 2014
The Record is not Update.Shahid Afridi Sixes Number is Change.so i want update records

Bbska (talk) 08:31, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 11:52, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ Updated. StAnselm (talk) 12:06, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 22 March 2014 For ODI records.
the last line of 2nd paragraph at the starting of the article states that maximum runs in an over are scored by (Herschelle Gibbs, 36), but it is to kindly inform that in 2007 in T20 World Cup, indian cricket player, Yuvraj Singh also scored 36 runs in an over. so you are kindly requested to update this information as soon as possible.

Thanking you

122.170.95.109 (talk) 13:27, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. (t) Josve05a  (c) 14:34, 22 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment: This page is for ODI records - T20I records are at List of Twenty20 International records. That list includes Yuvraj Singh. StAnselm (talk) 20:33, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 26 March 2014 For Best strike rates
Updation of strike rates as glenn maxwell holds the present record. Also, most catches and most stumpings records needs to be updated for kumar sangakkara.

Vin09 (talk) 14:24, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - updated strike rates. StAnselm (talk) 20:39, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ Updated both as requested. StAnselm (talk) 20:43, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 27 March 2014
122.170.91.198 (talk) 20:22, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Please resubmit your request providing details of the change you wish to have made and any reliable sources required. Thanks, Nici  Vampire  Heart  20:30, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 14 September 2014
The most successful team in ODI cricket, in terms of win percentage, barring the Asia XI cricket team,[5] is South Africa, having won 300 of their 483 ODIs (64.36%).

Team	       First ODI	 Matches	Won	Lost	Tied	No result	Win

Australia	5 January 1971 	 825	        505	 281	 9	 30	       64.08

14.99.53.171 (talk) 18:49, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ". Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to any article. - Arjayay (talk) 09:37, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: as you have not requested a specific change.

please update Highest individual scores section.
please update Highest individual scores section. rohit sharma has done 264 runs on november 13 2014 vs sri lanka at eden gardens. Ram nareshji (talk) 11:36, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 November 2014

 * highest run record in odi cricket ison the name of rohit sharma (india) with 264 runs on 13 nov 2014 in kolkata.. but in page old record is written, 219 runs by virendra sehwag .. which needs to be updated .. pls accept the request !!

Abhijeet17890 (talk) 11:58, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Stickee (talk) 12:17, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 16 November 2014
In the "Highest Individual Score in Chronological Order" table, Rohit Sharma's score of 209 is listed third from last. However, the next entry is a higher score by Verinder Sehwag of 219 which was scored 2 years earlier, as such the 209, while very impressive, would never have been the highest score. The dates seem to be recorded accurately as per the references provided. I would suggest either the 209 should be removed from the table, or an addendum added to clarify why it would be included.

123.211.73.36 (talk) 03:46, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

✅ This was a very recent addition - either a mistake or a misguided Rohit Sharma fan. - Arjayay (talk) 12:51, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 27 November 2014
In most career runs subsection of individual records(batting) section, the period field entry of Mahela Jayawardene should be "1998-present" instead of "1991-present" because Mahela made his ODI debut in 1998.

115.254.15.204 (talk) 10:44, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

✅ - he was only 13 or 14 in 1991 - Arjayay (talk) 11:25, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 24 February 2015
update the highest second wicket partnership ....chris gayle and marlon samuels 372..vs zimbabwe

42.61.83.50 (talk) 07:14, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

✔️ I came to fulfil this request, but someone else had already updated it. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:14, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 2 March 2015
The total sixes in a career is very outdated. Team              Player               Sixes   Innings Pakistan          Shahid Afridi        447     497 West Indies       Chris Gmail          414     414 New Zealand       Brendon McCullum     356     405 Sri Lanka         Sanath Jayasuriya    352     586 India             MS Dhoni             280     396 Source: http://sportzwiki.com/cricket/most-sixes-in-international-cricket

HaideraliR3 (talk) 22:50, 2 March 2015 (UTC)HAIDERALI

❌ Your source lists sixes in all International Cricket (ODI, T20 and Test matches), whereas this table just counts the sixes in ODIs. The table has the correct information for just ODIS. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:25, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Best bowling averages?
Should we include best career bowling averages here? We currently have 16 batting records, and only 5 bowling records, one of which is a negative one. StAnselm (talk) 05:11, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Out of interest, Mitchell Starc tops the list. StAnselm (talk) 05:20, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I think bowling strike rate could also be included, as it is in List of Cricket World Cup records. StAnselm (talk) 20:56, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ StAnselm (talk) 00:16, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 24 May 2015
I want to change the best bowling figures of Mehboob Alam (7.5-1-12-10). The link is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_ICC_World_Cricket_League_Division_Five

Anwesh Budhathoki (talk) 18:19, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format.  Edgars2007  (talk/contribs) 14:49, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The matches at 2008 ICC World Cricket League Division Five do not have ODI status.--Vin09 (talk) 10:27, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 25 October 2015
Please update the list:

Team scoring records Highest innings totals 443–9 (50 overs)	 Sri Lanka v Netherlands	Amstelveen	2006 439–2 (50 overs)	 South Africa v West Indies	Johannesburg	2014–15 438–9 (49.5 overs)†	 South Africa v Australia	Johannesburg	2005–06 434–4 (50 overs)†	 Australia v South Africa	Johannesburg	2005–06 418–5 (50 overs)	 South Africa v Zimbabwe	Potchefstroom	2006–07 418–5 (50 overs)	 India v West Indies	Indore	2011–12

TO -> 443–9 (50 overs)	 Sri Lanka v Netherlands	Amstelveen	2006 439–2 (50 overs)	 South Africa v West Indies	Johannesburg	2014–15 438-4 (50 overs)       South Africa v  India	Mumbai	2015 438–9 (49.5 overs)†	 South Africa v Australia	Johannesburg	2005–06 434–4 (50 overs)†	 Australia v South Africa	Johannesburg	2005–06 418–5 (50 overs)	 South Africa v Zimbabwe	Potchefstroom	2006–07

Echoing.umesh (talk) 12:02, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting wait.svg Already done This request was already done a while ago. Also, the South Africa v Zimbabwe match was not included since the article only uses the top five matches. --Stabila711 (talk) 05:35, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Please remove wrong entry in : Result records - Greatest win margin (by runs)
Wrong and unwanted sixth entry, i.e., South Africa (438-4) beat India (224); which would not even be in the top twenty of this list. Source Reference

Prthsnts (talk) 20:00, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ StAnselm (talk) 20:54, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 7 March 2016

 * 51.25 || 65 || 2819 || 🇮🇳 Jonathan Trott || 2009–2013

Please replace IND with ENG in the above line of code because Jonathan Trott belongs to the England Cricket Team. Page URL - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_One_Day_International_cricket_records

Kuldeepswiki (talk) 05:33, 7 March 2016 (UTC)


 * ✅-- Vin09 &thinsp; (talk)   05:57, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 16 March 2016
Please change

Most runs in an over Runs	Sequence	Batsman	Bowler	Venue	Season 36	6–6–6–6–6–6	South Africa Herschelle Gibbs	Netherlands Daan van Bunge	St. Kitts	2006–07 35	6–W–6–6–6–4–6	Sri Lanka Thisara Perera‡	South Africa Robin Peterson	Pallekele	2013 34	4–(N+6)–2–(N+4)–4–4–2–6	South Africa AB de Villiers‡	 Jason Holder	Sydney	2014–15 32	4–4–6–6–6–6	Pakistan Shahid Afridi	Sri Lanka Malinga Bandara‡	Abu Dhabi	2007 31	1–6–6–4–6–(N+4)–W–2[a]	New Zealand Kane Williamson‡

to

Most runs in an over Runs	Sequence	Batsman	Bowler	Venue	Season 36     6–6–6–6–6–6     India Yuvraj Singh    England Stuart Braod    Durban   2007 36	6–6–6–6–6–6	South Africa Herschelle Gibbs	Netherlands Daan van Bunge	St. Kitts	2006–07 35	6–W–6–6–6–4–6	Sri Lanka Thisara Perera‡	South Africa Robin Peterson	Pallekele	2013 34	4–(N+6)–2–(N+4)–4–4–2–6	South Africa AB de Villiers‡	 Jason Holder	Sydney	2014–15 32	4–4–6–6–6–6	Pakistan Shahid Afridi	Sri Lanka Malinga Bandara‡	Abu Dhabi	2007 31	1–6–6–4–6–(N+4)–W–2[a]	New Zealand Kane Williamson‡

You can refer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_ICC_World_Twenty20 and search page by ""Player of the match: Yuvraj Singh (Ind)""

Ankitchouksey1 (talk) 09:18, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. &mdash;Skyllfully (talk &#124; contribs) 19:30, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 21 June 2016
I request that Mehboob Alam of Nepal should be the first in best bowling. His bowling was 10-12(10 wickets for 12 runs) in a match against Mozambique in 2008 in the World Cricket League Division 5. This record was made in Jersey in the Cricket Ground called Grainville. Please add all this to table that shows the best bowling.

Sadbhav Adhikari (talk) 01:43, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 02:21, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Wrong Flag
Under 'Most Runs in an innings as wicketkeeper batsman', Adam Gilchrist is listed with an Indian flag. He played for Australia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.198.242.148 (talk) 15:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Wrong Scorecard Link
Under 'Fastest centuries', the scorecard link for AB De Villiers record leads to the wrong match page 117.198.242.148 (talk) 15:13, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ Thanks &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 16:51, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Most Runs in an over
Add Yuvraj Singh to the list of “Most Runs in an over as a batsman” as he scored 36 runs (6,6,6,6,6,6) against Stuart Broad,England Mayurswnt (talk) 09:23, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 24 January 2019
gilchrist highest score is against zimbambwe not new zealand 2605:A601:91B:9A00:49FA:6341:7D83:E449 (talk) 05:56, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – Jonesey95 (talk) 11:21, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Why no Women's Cricket records?
Nothing on this page says that it is only for men's cricket and yet there are no other records listed. treesmill (talk) 21:27, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Women's ODI records are at List of women's One Day International cricket records. 2A00:23C5:E80D:F300:7062:7070:763A:109A (talk) 19:54, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Hatnote added. – Jonesey95 (talk) 11:25, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 19 February 2019
Greatest win margin (by balls remaining) 280 balls	 Scotland (26–0) beat Oman (24)	Al Amarat, Oman	19 February 2019 Scorecard (http://www.espncricinfo.com/series/19121/scorecard/1173596/oman-vs-scotland-1st-match-scotland-tour-of-oman-2018-19)

Lowest innings totals 24 (17.1 overs)	 Oman	 Scotland	Al Amarat	19 February 2019 Scorecard (http://www.espncricinfo.com/series/19121/scorecard/1173596/oman-vs-scotland-1st-match-scotland-tour-of-oman-2018-19)

Highest strike rates 121.64 2,327	1,913	Australia Glenn Maxwell ‡	2012–present

Individual records (fielding) Most catches in ODI career 137	New Zealand Ross Taylor	217

Individual records (wicket-keeping) Most dismissals 430 (311 catches + 119 stumpings)	India MS Dhoni ‡	338

Most catches 311	India MS Dhoni ‡	338

Most stumpings :- MS Dhoni :- Stumpings-119 Innings 338 Mitratanmoy (talk) 08:10, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
 * The Oman v Scotland game is not a full ODI (Oman don't have ODI status) so only did the fielding records. Also the wicket-keeping records show innings kept in, not total matches, to deal with those players who sometimes played as a batsman only. Spike &#39;em (talk) 09:02, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

international cricket
add list of batsmens with most not out in odi Ad45451 (talk) 10:29, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Do you have a source for the figures and some indication that this is a noteworthy list to include? I have never seen mention of a player setting a record for a number of not outs. Spike &#39;em (talk) 10:53, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

New section request : Most runs between consecutive dismissals, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Looking for the section of highest score between two consecutive dismissals in ODI cricket CourageSword (talk) 00:38, 17 May 2019 (UTC) I found the following data whcich can be varified CourageSword (talk) 00:38, 17 May 2019 (UTC) Most runs scored between two dismissals section can be added Runs	Team                        Player	                  Innings	       Scores	                                         Season 455	Pakistan                    Fakhar Zaman	          4                    117*, 43*, 210*, 85                               2018 405	Pakistan                    Mohammad Yousuf	          4	               141*, 76*, 100*, 88	                         2002 400	South Africa                Lance Klusener	          10                   103*, 35*, 13*, 35*, 12*, 52*, 48*, 52*, 46*, 4	 1999 398	Pakistan                    Javed Miandad	          7                    31*, 61*, 106*, 3*, 119*, 6*, 72	                 1982-83 389	Sri Lanka                   Aravinda De Silva	          4	               49*, 83*, 127*, 75*, 55                    	 1996 369    India                        MS Dhoni                     7                    78*, 50*, 87*, 35*, 15*, 75*, 29                  2011-12 — Preceding unsigned comment added by CourageSword (talk • contribs) 00:39, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Most centuries
!27 !27
 * 171 || Hashim Amla ‡ || 2008–present
 * 208 || Rohit Sharma ‡ || 2007–present
 * - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exp3456 (talk • contribs) 18:51, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Alduin2000 (talk) 02:30, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Showing current active players
Can we show current active players in bold as opposed to '‡'? This maintains the same format as records tables for football, tennis and other sports. Kvwiki1234 (talk) 03:32, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Using dagger / double dagger seems to be the standard on cricket articles, so why not change football to match this? Bolding text to indicate some attribute seems to go against MOS:NOSTRIKE, but the plain double-daggers may need replacing with a screen-reader friendly version too. Spike &#39;em (talk) 09:11, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
 * One thing I would change thought, is to remove whatever method we use for records that are not career / time-based. To me, it makes no difference whether the highest score / best bowling figures are by a current player. I'd keep it in for career lists (most runs / wickets etc). Spike &#39;em (talk) 11:03, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

The second table that says most sixes in an innings should say most fours in an innings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.102.101.21 (talk) 14:20, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Corrections needed
17/06/2022 - liam livingstone just hit second fastest 50 The page is semi-protected, and I don't have a Wiki username so I can't log in and do it. I hope someone here cares enough to bother... Also need to update most 6's in an innings, England just hit 26 vs the Netherlands, and the total match aggregate should place them something like 3rd or 4th. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.250.5.158 (talk) 00:57, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

1. Section 3.2 "Result records" > "Narrowest win margins (by balls remaining)" > Text should say "by winning OFF the last ball" (not 'of').

2. Section 3.3 "Team scoring records" > "Most sixes in an innings" > Second table with this heading should be headed "Most FOURS in an innings".

3. Section 4.2 "Most career runs – progression of record" > Table formatting is broken in second non-header row -- should have column break between "Australia" and "26 August".

4. Section 4.8 "Highest career average" > Needs to be a newline or some kind of separator between "3000 runs" and "Last updated" in the final row of the table. Some of the following tables have similar problems -- a consistent approach would be good.

5. Section 4.9 "Highest average for each batting position" > The previous and following tables have "Qualification:" in the final row to explain the text. This should be added here, also.

6. Section 7.3 "Most stumpings" > One row in the table has the text in the final column randomly centred.

7. Section 8.2 "Most matches played as Captain" > (a) don't need capitals in section title (also in several of the following sections), and (b) some of the year ranges in the final column use hyphens; some use en-dashes.

8. A lot of the data have not been updated for over a year (and in the case of section 4.12 "Most fifties" (and others), more than four years).

Having said all the above, though, thank you for the data on this page -- it has been very useful to me. Much appreciated, and keep up the good work.
 * I think I've done all of these, though I have reworded a couple of the results records. Also, I think the tables are being monitored, but some of them have not been updated since the records last changed. Spike &#39;em (talk) 09:59, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Ms Dhoni
The one man ms dhoni. He best captain of india history. His stumping supper and he 0.08 secend stumping. The world's best captain and finisher. Legend of msd. 157.45.130.99 (talk) 12:55, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Ms Dhoni
The one man ms dhoni. He best captain of india history. His stumping supper and he 0.08 secend stumping. The world's best captain and finisher. Legend of msd. 157.45.130.99 (talk) 12:55, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 21 October 2022
Kindly change the nationality of Corey Anderson from Australia to NewZealand in 'Best career bowling strike rate' table. 122.186.73.66 (talk) 06:51, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ Cannolis (talk) 08:04, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Highest average per position
As per related discussion at Talk:List of Twenty20 International records, this section would seem to rely on OR (user defined statsguru searches) and in particular completely arbitrary inclusion criteria. Could anyone find any articles / lists in the real world that document this, otherwise I feel inclined to remove the table. Spike &#39;em (talk) 11:12, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 20 January 2023
Under Individual Records (Batting), Fastest to 1000 ODI runs, add something new.

Shubhman Gill has achieved that feat in 19 innings being the second fastest to do so. Make this edit please.

Link - https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/stats-shubman-gill-is-youngest-to-score-200-and-fastest-indian-to-1000-odi-runs-1354556?platform=amp Siddhant1607 (talk) 18:10, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
 * ❌ this table has never included the second fastest to any landmark, can't see a reason to start doing so now. Spike &#39;em (talk) 18:24, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 23 January 2023
71.37 Sivahemaneel (talk) 13:21, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Lightoil (talk) 13:50, 23 January 2023 (UTC)