Talk:List of Playboy Playmates of 1995

External links in the Playboy Lists
There has been recent action to delete external links to the Playboy Wiki in these lists. If you are interested, either for or against, there is a discussion about it here: Noticeboard for External links. Wikilister (talk) 13:51, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Delete This Page
nothing at all is noteworthy about this page, nor are there any Wikipedia approved sources for this page. Lets get this page down. -Richterer11111 (talk) 16:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
 * This page should be removed. -Amiryucky (talk) 14:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)


 * As debate continues surrounding if page is noteworthy, in meantime will edit for accuracy. The current list has no accurate sources, hence edited it. -Richterer11111 (talk) 09:48, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Please don't attempt to blank large portions of pages that you don't like while they are at AfD...that's considered at least borderline disruptive behavior. Thank you. Guy1890 (talk) 06:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * There are no real sources for the living people you are mentioning in this biography. IF some of them have information leave it. Also unclear why the information on Mel Gibson interview was removed. Richterer11111 (talk) 19:55, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Lisa Marie Scott
Are we good deleting her entree? Theres no approved sources? Richterer11111 (talk) 20:24, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
 * No, she like all the rest just requires a bit of legwork. See . You should be spending your time compiling these sources rather than persistently trying to have sourceable entries removed. JohnInDC (talk) 05:09, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 * What is sourceable about her page. Playboy pictorials do not make her noteworthy, and for a BLP this isn't a source. She is not noteworthy, and one naked pictorial doesn't consistite a wiki mention for a BLP. Richterer11111 (talk) 22:52, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 * You're not making a "sourcing" argument but a notability one. If you have serious concerns on that front, take the relevant tarticles to AfD and see what the consensus is on those.  Meantime your persistent removal of content is disruptive and may well wind up getting you blocked.  Stop it please.  Thanks.  JohnInDC (talk) 03:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Sources and BLP
There appear to be very clear rules regarding BLP. Why is it that people keep adding information here with sources like adultfilmdatabase or IMDB. And further why would a single pictorial make these people noteable. That said, some of them are noteable and should remain - but some shouldn't. Richterer11111 (talk) 23:07, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm (laboriously) going through the article to add links to Playboy.com, which is certainly a reliable and appropriate source for identifying people who've appeared within the pages of the magazine. It's laborious - but it's trivial, and you need to quit removing content for lack of proper sources when you yourself could undertake the simple task of tracking down those sources yourself.  Thanks.  JohnInDC (talk) 02:59, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Asked for help at dispute resolution here
Appreciate comments. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:List_of_Playboy_Playmates_of_1995 Richterer11111 (talk) 01:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Further clear here that being a playmate alone does NOT make someone noteable.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Pornographic_actors_and_models Per BLP, am deleting these entrees immediately. Richterer11111 (talk) 01:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Notability guidelines do not apply to content within an article. Even if none of the actors here were notable, they could still be included in this article. They could not have standalone articles of their own, but could be listed here. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 04:46, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Question
Out of curiosity, why was this particular year singled out for the dispute and edit warring? --Neil N  talk to me 04:28, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * It is most likely that it features a person someone knows and wants off the list. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 04:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * deleted content from List of people in Playboy 1990–99 in addition to this.
 * deleted content from List of Playboy Playmates of 1994  and List of Playboy Playmates of 1996 as well. --Ronz (talk) 16:20, 15 February 2017 (UTC)


 * It's pretty clear (to more than just myself) that we've been dealing with at least a small set of sock/meatpuppeters for a while now in these type of articles. As I noted in the current AFD for this article here, "people don't just show up on Wikipedia and start AfDs on their first few edits". There's been recent edit warring in this article here as well, and I don't think that asking some of these above (obviously not new at all to Wikipedia) participants to start bundling multiple AfDs and/or start RFCs is especially productive at all at this late date. Guy1890 (talk) 03:50, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If you suspect socking, it would be appropriate to take this to WP:SPI. Making accusations outside of an investigation is not going to help, and can be consider uncivil. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 10:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * NOTE: "Richterer11111" was recently blocked for being a sockpuppet. Guy1890 (talk) 22:58, 10 March 2017 (UTC)