Talk:List of Roman client queens

Merger proposal
Very little room for growth and no reason not to include names to List of Roman client kings - or, per WP:MERGEREASON: "If a page is very short and is unlikely to be expanded within a reasonable amount of time, it often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic." The page hasn't changed over the last 13 months and it's unlikely that many more client queens will be added to the list. This article is less than 1kB in size while the other is merely 5kB, so per WP:SIZESPLIT there's no reason for the split either. Merging it into the name "client kings" might be up for debate, but the client king article could easily be moved to List of Roman client rulers or a section could be made on that page called "Client queens". The term "client queen" isn't all too common anyway (which explains the mere 96 views over the last month). Bataaf van Oranje (Prinsgezinde) (talk) 13:02, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ Klbrain (talk) 18:02, 30 December 2018 (UTC)