Talk:List of Romanian Top 100 top 10 singles in 2011

RT100
De ce ati tot modificat piesele care au intrat in top 10 anul acesta? Initial erau bine puse, dar apoi cineva a facut topul doar in functie de difuzarile radio, desi ar fi trebuit sa ia in calcul si difuzarile tv. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.78.57.40 (talk) 07:34, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Romanian Top 100 este de fapt clasamentul difuzarilor radio, fara cel al difuzarilor TV, desi pentru o perioada, prin 2009-2010, s-au luat ambele in considerare. Insa din moment ce o sursa credibila publica un clasament doar al difuzarilor radio [asa cum e clasamentul normal], nu vom lua in considerare alte surse, care folosesc si TV-ul. 14:09, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Si atunci cum se face ca Alexandra Stan e no. 1 de 8 saptamani si ca are pe fiecare saptamana peste 400 de difuzari (clar ca se aduna radio si tv)? Si parca se intocmea in functie de Media Forest, care monitorizeaza si radio si tv.Va cam contraziceti singuri, dar asta e.Si pana si pe Romania Libera sunt publicate ambele topuri, radio si tv, dar n-ai adunat tu cele 2 clasamente. Adiciurea (talk) 18:00, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Trebuie corectat doar pentru radio. Media Forest monitorizeaza ambele, dar separat, dupa cum se vede si pe site-ul oficial. Alecsdaniel (talk) 19:52, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Daca RT100 insemna doar difuzari radio, Alexandra Stan nu avea cum sa aiba 478 difuzari inr-o saptamana.Daca te-ai uita pe Media Forest, ai vedea ca 478 e exact suma difuzarilor radio si tv.Si tot azi am urmarit RT100 difuzat pe Kiss FM si Dj Sava era pe 5, Akcent pe 4 etc, exact dupa numarul de difuzari RADIO + TV. Nu mai insist, o sa-ti dai singur seama ca pana acum ati calculat bine topurile, dar acum luand doar difuzarile radio, faceti o greseala, mai ales ca si in ziarul respectiv sunt date ambele topuri, radio si tv. Numai bine, eu nu mai insist.
 * Nu eu fac regulile, insa cred ca e mai corect ca topul sa fie folosit asa cum a fost creat initial si functionat timp de ani [airplay]. Moda cu tv+radio a inceput odata cu publicarea clasamentului de catre Cotidianul, care folosea sistemul de monitorizare Nielsen. In 2010 nu a mai publicat, asa ca am continuat asa cum incepuse ziarul, insa daca acum exista un clasament oficial publicat, de asemenea bazat pe cel creat de Media Forest, el trebuie folosit. Ar trebui ca site-ul oficial sa publice o editie macar, pentru a vedea care coincide. "Mr Saxobeat" are 478 pentru ca cineva a scris, pe niciun site nu scrie ca single-ul are 478 difuzari in saptamana trecuta. De asemenea, daca te-ai uita in istoricul unor pagini, ai vedea ca eu sunt cel care a facut update mult timp, iar la total difuzarilor adaugam totalul radio + tv, nu doar radio. Insa dupa cum am mai zis, traditional, clasamentul este bazat pe difuzarile radio. Alecsdaniel (talk) 21:29, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Per Talk page guidelines, always write in English as this is the English Wikipedia. Thanks. Grk1011 (talk) 21:33, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Mi se pare o prostie asta sa se ia in calcul doar difuzarile radio, pentru ca o piesa e hit atunci cand e difuzata atat pe radio, cat si pe tv.Gandeste-te ca RT100 de acum e alcatuit din ambele difuzari, eu am urmarit ieri topul in mod intentionat, tocmai pentru a vedea asta.Si-n plus, te vei complica, nu vei avea cum sa afisezi difuzarile melodiilor de acum, va fi o discordanta mare intre ce a fost pana acum o luna si acum.Si pot fi si 2 melodii cu acelasi numar de difuzari la radio, cum le departajezi?Nu luand si difuzarile tv?Nielsen ia doar radio-urile, fiind oricum un top irelevant, ptr. ca Nielsen ia inclusiv 15 secunde dintr-o melodie, nu face diferenta intre un demmo, jingle si o piesa difuzata in intregime.Eu zic sa revii la cum a fost pana acum, pentru ca repet, asa ia in calcul inclusiv RT100 (urmareste-l duminica pe KISS FM, o sa te convingi). "Ar trebui ca site-ul oficial sa publice o editie macar, pentru a vedea care coincide. "Mr Saxobeat" are 478 pentru ca cineva a scris, pe niciun site nu scrie ca single-ul are 478 difuzari in saptamana trecuta" - ba da, exact atatea are, atatea da informatia si Media Forest si exact pe locul 1 s-a clasat si in RT100, in fata altor piese cu punctaj mai mic, exact cum erau date pe Media Forest.
 * De asta si folosesc editia publicata de Romania libera, pentru ca acolo sunt ordonate intr-un anumit fel, chiar daca este egalitate [nu stiu pe ce criteriu]. Pe de alta parte, in nicio alta tara nu se folosesc difuzarile de la TV pentru a alcatui un top oficial - suntem noi mai speciali ca de obicei. Cei de la Kiss folosesc de asemenea varianta radio + tv, de asta au zis ca "Mr Saxobeat" are 478 difuzari. Ca sa dovestesti ca "Only Girl" a Rihannei a atins locul 3 in clasament, nu poti pune sursa catre Media Forest si apoi sa zici ca nota, ca daca se aduna radio + TV, atunci reiese ca ar fi pe locul 3. Nu s-ar accepta asta si ar aparea intrebarea "daca e clasamentul oficial, de ce nu e adunat la un loc?" Alecsdaniel (talk) 12:57, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Dar atunci e corect s-o lasi pe Alexandra Stan in top cu 8 no. 1-uri (toate obtinute din radio + tv) ? Sau e corect ca DJ Sava sa fie pe 2, desi cand a fost pe 2 DOAR la radio, nici nu avea clip, deci clar nu putea sa fie o piesa mai difuzata si sa fie "mai hit" decat una cu difuzare atat pe radio, cat si pe tv. Si chiar si daca folosesti topul din Romania Libera, nu stiu de ce n-ai vazut ca ei dau si topul radio, cat si cel tv, deci ce era asa greu sa le aduni, ca sa fii si tu laolalta cu ce dau toti, inclusiv TOPUL OFICIAL RT100, difuzat pe KISS?
 * Ba sigur se poate. "Break it Off" de Rihanna sau "Rescue Me" de Madonna n-au avut videoclip si au devenit hituri de top 10 in Billboard Hot 100, in timp ce alte piese din acea perioada, cu tot cu clip, poate abia au ajuns in top 50. Exact cum ai zis si tu, ziarul publica ambele topuri, din nou, separat. / Of course you can. "Break It Off" by Rihanna or "Rescue Me" by Madonna didn't have a video and they became top 10 hits in the Billboard Hot 100 chart, while other songs, from the same period, even though they had a video, maybe failed to make it into the top 50. Like you said, the newspaper published both charts, but, yet again, separately. Alecsdaniel (talk) 14:03, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Did I not make myself clear above? Grk1011 (talk) 13:51, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I guess he doesn't speak English.Alecsdaniel (talk) 14:03, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Both charts are published in Romania Libera, separately, as you said, but nothing stops you to gather those two charts and make one, the official one. Because whatever you say, RT100 broadcast on KISS FM every Sunday morning is the official top and you should take it as good.Why is more relevant the chart consisting of radio broadcasts than the other chart, consisting of tv broadcasts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adiciurea (talk • contribs) 14:20, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Saying that "Kiss FM says so" isn't reliable. The chart has to be printed to proof it's existence. What if you say "this song peaked at 13" and I say "no, I saw that it peaked at 17". How can any of us prove that the other is wrong? You can't go on saying "add the 100 plays on TV and the 203 plays on the radio, and you'll see", when we already have a reliable source that shows the most played songs. If "Romania libera" would have published a combined chart, I would have used that - "Cotidianul" did the same in 2009, adding both TV and radio plays in one chart. Only Kiss FM combines it, but you can't prove it, like I said, since it's only broadcasted. An official chart uses airplay or digital downloads or single sales to determine one song's popularity, I have never heard of a chart using TV plays. Alecsdaniel (talk) 19:58, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

As I can see, someone modified again the Top 10 Singles Page, and it wasn`t me. Now they are put correct. Tv plays are very relevant, like radio plays are, because me and you and all the listeners know a song from radio, but also from tv. So, you should use radio + tv, for that you have Media Forest (it has a precise measurement) and RT100. Anyway, thank you for the dialogue, you were very courteous. And as an add, the past tense form for the verb "to broadcast" is "broadcast", not "broadcasted" :P — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adiciurea (talk • contribs) 21:20, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * a) I have used Media Forest before to update it, no problem. Two wrongs don't make a right, but the majority decides, and if users think radio + tv should be used, I'm not going to try to keep it my way.

b)Thanks! You were nice too, but I think I was nicer because I like me more [just joking]. c)You're right, my bad, I was in a hurry, didn't think too much before using words. Have a nice day! Alecsdaniel (talk) 14:30, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Thank you, Alex! Hope to see you again around here! Have a nice day! Adiciurea (talk) 15:33, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of Romanian Top 100 top 10 singles in 2011. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100111021359/http://www.rt100.ro/editorial_37.html to http://www.rt100.ro/editorial_37.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110117224451/http://rt100.ro/ to http://rt100.ro/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:09, 19 May 2017 (UTC)