Talk:List of Sigma Phi Epsilon chapters

University of Colorado at Boulder
Someone posted the following on the Help Desk page:

''On the list of Sigma Phi Epsilon chapters it says that number 10 Colorado Alpha is SEC which is incorrect because Colorado Alpha officialy recieved a charter in November of 2007. You can contact Sigma Phi Epsilon nationally to verify this.''

Can someone work out what needs doing?--86.149.54.19 (talk) 08:52, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Format
For this list, you may want to check out the template on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fraternities and Sororities for a proper method of organization. Jr ss r5 19:40, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Update list
This list needs a SERIOUS update. It only goes up to 1977, and many chapters have since been foundedTallicfan20 (talk) 05:49, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * You are welcome to work on it. I know it is out of date, my chapter is not even on the list. I just dont have the time to work on it.  Chris  lk02  Chris Kreider 13:33, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * At least the last two edits are probably vandalism, but I didn't find a reference to show what does and doesn't belong on the list. Art LaPella (talk) 03:51, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

List of Sigma Phi Epsilon chapters
For List of Sigma Phi Epsilon chapters. Found a ref for the chartering dates (month/day/year). https://issuu.com/sigmaphiepsilon/docs/lrob-2015. The question is should we merge everything into a List of chapters by founding. (The notes are going to get either removed or make into a notes refs and moved below)Naraht (talk) 15:22, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * It's another of the non-standard, but good-faith lists. Yes, I think you are right: the tables should be merged, listed by founding date, and the notes placed as EFNs. As ΣΦΕ is one of the largest of the GLOs, after the name column -- for clarity --  I'd suggest we split out the abbreviation as an adjacent column (if it fits; it's not as important as the other project-standard columns), and keep the narrow column noting national roll number.  They use that number, and it won't hurt to retain it.  Of course we should add columns for city and state. Jax MN (talk) 15:46, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * OK, so what does a row look like (and I'm quite willing to move this to Talk:List of Sigma Phi Epsilon chapters...

Naraht (talk) 17:17, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Chapter Roll : 999
 * Chapter: West Virginia Omega (do we include the (WV Ω), I presume we *are* including the RLC)?
 * Institution: Southwest West Virginia Institute
 * City: Mars
 * State: West Virginia
 * Status: Inactive
 * Notes:
 * Ref: ?
 * I'd use this template:


 * The information on this example entry is correct. I do not know why ΣΦΕ numbers its Alpha chapter as merely #137.  It likely is the rank in terms of length of active tenure. Assuming that is the case, I am less convinced that roll number is important, at least from Wikipedia's perspective.  And for reasons of space, the name abbreviation may not be needed.  (Seriously, isn't there a shorter word for the word "abbreviation"?) Sortability is the trigger that makes all this work.  Place the chapters in default order by date of original installation.  The Fraternity may have an interest in noting age of service: check their national website for an indication of this.  If it was just a 'good idea' from an early Wikipedia author, without strong national usage, maybe we should delete this column. Jax MN (talk) 17:47, 29 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Yes, it is probably a good idea to move this discussion to the Sig Ep talk page. Note, I just added the Baird's Archive to the chapter list page as a reference, and I think we should probably retain the RLCs, within the table as they presently are shown. Jax MN (talk) 17:58, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Start here on Talk page for Article
Abbr. is the Abbreviation for Abbreviation. As far as I can tell, the 137 for the founding chapter was Vandalism it *is* number 1. I'm in favor of keeping it. (Sigma Phi Epsilon *definitely* cares about it, see the reference.)