Talk:List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in East Sussex

Unavailable size data
Just to say that in other SSSI lists where the acreage has been unavailable I have worked it out myself by using an online hectare to acre converter, rather than leaving it blank. Suicidalhamster (talk) 17:39, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Qst (talk) 18:46, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

SSSIs in East Sussex for which articles do not yet exist
Just the following left to create: SP-KP (talk) 18:55, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Blackhorse Quarry, Brede Pit and Cutting, Burgh Hill Farm Meadow, Buxted Park, Castle Hill, Brighton, Combe Haven, Dallington Forest, Darwell Wood, Dungeness, Romney Marsh and Rye Bay, Eridge Green, Eridge Park, Firle Escarpment, Fore Wood, Herstmonceux Park, Marline Valley Woods, Northiam SSSI, Offham Marshes, Rye Harbour, Waldron Cutting, Weir Wood Reservoir, Willingdon Down, Wilmington Downs, Winchelsea Cutting.

That's all of them, as requested. :) Qst (talk) 21:31, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Added Castle Hill to list which was pointing to a disambiguation page. MortimerCat (talk) 03:38, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Added Rye Harbour which was pointing to the village of Rye Harbour. (and struck out those that have links) ++ MortimerCat (talk) 09:10, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thats them all done (if anyone is still watching) and they are are all mentioned in the appropriate parish article too. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 12:56, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

map column
The resource cannot be found.

Description: HTTP 404. The resource you are looking for (or one of its dependencies) could have been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable. Please review the following URL and make sure that it is spelled correctly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zemliakov (talk • contribs) 03:27, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Map links have been updated.  Ma &reg;&copy; usBr iti sh  {chat} 00:15, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in East Sussex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080705173123/http://www.theargus.co.uk/whatson/walks/eastsussex/hooecircular/ to http://www.theargus.co.uk/whatson/walks/eastsussex/hooecircular/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 17:42, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in East Sussex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120515062100/http://www.sssi.naturalengland.org.uk/special/sssi/notification.cfm to http://www.sssi.naturalengland.org.uk/special/sssi/notification.cfm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121024015516/http://www.sssi.naturalengland.org.uk/citation/citation_photo/1002162.pdf to http://www.sssi.naturalengland.org.uk/citation/citation_photo/1002162.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121024015728/http://www.sssi.naturalengland.org.uk/citation/citation_photo/1002885.pdf to http://www.sssi.naturalengland.org.uk/citation/citation_photo/1002885.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121024020814/http://www.sssi.naturalengland.org.uk/citation/citation_photo/1001954.pdf to http://www.sssi.naturalengland.org.uk/citation/citation_photo/1001954.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121024021102/http://www.sssi.naturalengland.org.uk/citation/citation_photo/1002260.pdf to http://www.sssi.naturalengland.org.uk/citation/citation_photo/1002260.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:46, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in East Sussex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071012063638/http://www.eastsussex.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/7C0A3782-EB89-4E92-8E99-17CC34672073/0/map_of_east_sussex_focus.pdf to http://www.eastsussex.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/7C0A3782-EB89-4E92-8E99-17CC34672073/0/map_of_east_sussex_focus.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071027134518/http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/getamap/help.html to http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/getamap/help.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:43, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Sort problem
Sort does not work in this table but so far as I can see there is nothing different from other tables I have created where is does work. Can you advise what the problem is please? Dudley Miles (talk) 11:48, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * I tried, and it works for me. What exactly doesn't seem to work as expected? Huon (talk) 13:14, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * That is very strange. When I click on the column headings nothing happens. It must be something to do with my computer but it works in all other lists I have tried such as lists of SSSIs in Surrey and West Sussex. Dudley Miles (talk) 14:30, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Works as intended for me. Some columns aren't sortable, though: Photograph, Map, Citation and Description. I tried all others, no problems. You should see the small arrow symbols on the sortable columns. Huon (talk) 17:51, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Review
and. I should be grateful if you would look over this article, which has been rewritten since it passed FLC in 2008. Thanks. Dudley Miles (talk) 13:57, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi Dudley, It looks good. If I were reviewing it for FL now I'd support. I made one tweak to one of the refs - the fields were the wrong way round. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 19:24, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Many thanks SchroCat. Dudley Miles (talk) 21:42, 16 July 2019 (UTC)


 * I'm slow! I hope to look in tomorrow. More anon.  Tim riley  talk   21:14, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I've now been through the text in as pernickety a vein as I have at my command, and like SchroCat I can find nothing to frown at. It's right and proper to review the quality of the page given that you have – for which you deserve our thanks – revised it materially since it passed FLC in 2008, but the current version seems to me unquestionably of FL quality. The only quibble I can find is that the 8th column seems too wide at the expense of the 11th, but I'm not well enough up in the layout of tables to know if this could be tweaked. As to the content, I have no criticism at all. A model of its kind. –  Tim riley  talk   21:21, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Many thanks Tim. I have not specified the width of the columns. In view of the great variation in computer screen sizes, the rule as I understand it is to leave it to the browser to determine the width. Dudley Miles (talk) 21:36, 18 July 2019 (UTC)