Talk:List of Sudanese detainees at Guantanamo Bay

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Pages moved  Ron h jones (Talk) 00:12, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Sudanese captives in Guantanamo → Sudanese detainees at Guantanamo Bay — Requested moves are limited to 20 articles each, this is the second half of the requested moves. The main discussion is taking place at Talk:Afghan captives in Guantanamo. Labattblueboy (talk) 15:16, 24 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Jordanian captives in Guantanamo → Jordanian detainees at Guantanamo Bay
 * Tajik captives held in Guantanamo → Tajik detainees at Guantanamo Bay
 * Egyptian captives in Guantanamo → Egyptian detainees at Guantanamo Bay
 * Syrian captives in Guantanamo → Syrian detainees at Guantanamo Bay
 * Iraqi captives in Guantanamo → Iraqi detainees at Guantanamo Bay
 * Bosnian captives in Guantanamo → Bosnian detainees at Guantanamo Bay
 * Azerbaijani captives in Guantanamo → Azerbaijani detainees at Guantanamo Bay
 * Canadian captives in Guantanamo → Canadian detainees at Guantanamo Bay
 * Algerian captives in Guantanamo → Algerian detainees at Guantanamo Bay
 * Russian captives in Guantanamo → Russian detainees at Guantanamo Bay
 * Belgian captives in Guantanamo → Belgian detainees at Guantanamo Bay
 * Iranian captives in Guantanamo → Iranian detainees at Guantanamo Bay
 * Turkish captives in Guantanamo → Turkish detainees at Guantanamo Bay
 * French captives in Guantanamo → French detainees at Guantanamo Bay
 * United Arab Emirates captives in Guantanamo → United Arab Emirati detainees at Guantanamo Bay


 * Support all Whether or not they were "captured", they are certainly detained. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:49, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment That should be United Arab Emirati detainees at Guantanamo Bay. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:51, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Good question, I was actually wondering the same thing but had difficultly finding the appropriate gramatical structure. Pleae find that error corrected.--Labattblueboy (talk) 16:53, 24 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Support all One can argue about the word "captive" in this instance, but no one can argue that they are/were certainly detained. -- S Masters (talk) 05:23, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.