Talk:List of The 100 characters

Grounders
The grounders are split into clans and the clan that Anya and Lexa are in are known as the Tree People or Treekru. Martingolding96 (talk) 23:47, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

City of Light Affiliation
City of Light affiliation does not have to be listed for characters other than the ones who are specifically created for that story line. I have removed it from Jaha and Jackson. If it is believed that it should be listed on all who have been a part of CoL, then it should also be added to Abby, Ontari and other characters. I believe it us unnecessary. User:BSCD128 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:40, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I completely agree. Unlike other affiliations, which are static, city of light affiliations are constantly being changed. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 10:47, 23 April 2016 (UTC)


 * None of this excuses your edit warring and now-violation of 3RR. Alex&#124;The&#124;Whovian ? 11:15, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * A 3RR violation requires 4 reverts in 24 hours. BSCD128 has only made 3 reverts. You have both edit warred. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 12:29, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * The initial edit is counted. That's 4. Alex&#124;The&#124;Whovian ? 14:19, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * The initial edit was not a reversion so it is not counted. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 14:52, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Creation of Octavia Blake article
I'm putting together an article for Octavia Blake, and I'm having some trouble finishing it up. Please, help. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gonzalogallard/sandbox#Octavia_Blake Gonzalogallard (talk) 18:26, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
 * It needs references, and the image should be of the character, not the actress. Alex&#124;The&#124;Whovian ? 03:30, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Cast table
I have proceeded to eliminate the part of "Affiliation", I think it is a little unnecessary, and that information is clarified in the description of the respective characters. No obstantes I do not know how important this can be for other users, in any case, I think it can be restore.-- Philip J Fry   Talk  02:41, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't really have a problem with removal of "Affiliation" but your edits to the table introduced a number of problems. Row and column scopes, required for compliance with MOS:ACCESS/MOS:DTT, were removed as were column widths while some incorrect column widths replaced them. Formatting was removed and this is a "list of characters" article so characters should be listed first (as they were) for consistency with the rest of the article. I've corrected these issues as well as some others. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 19:25, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I understand, but why not link the characters, as i had done? For example "[#Finn Collins|Finn Collins]". So you could get to the section of that character faster instead of going down, I do not know if you noticed that the article is a bit extensive. At least on my computer it is a bit extensive.-- Philip J Fry   Talk  21:47, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I must have deleted those links while I was trying to fix the table. They're a good idea. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 12:27, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

haracter table
This edit summary makes no sense: That said, the first column was wrapping when there was no need to do that so I've widened it to 21%, which the fits everything neatly on 1 line. 26% is far too wide for the first two columns. It's just completely unnecessary to have so much whitespace. Note that the season widths were set to 8% so that they would all appear to be the same width. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 14:05, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Not how column widths are supposed to work - Actually, that's exactly how column widths work. They all have to add up to the total width, which was set at 78%. 15+15+(6x8) = 78. The first change removed the overall width specification which forces it to 100% by default. 15+15+(6x8) is not 100!
 * (they're supposed to be %'age of the TOTAL, regardless of what that figure is - And they were.
 * table should not be set to some arbitrary width - Table widths can be set to anything. There is no rule that they can't be set to a particular width and setting the width to 100% IS setting the table to an arbitrary width.