Talk:List of The Demonata characters

General comments
I have read the 1st book of the Demonata (Lord Loss) and it is really good and i loved it i would reccomend it!!!!!!! :) (:'' We'll need a lot of help to make this a gooBold textd article. Can everyone please help?--veon 22:53, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I deleted a section on the named Demonata as they've got their own page already, there seems to be a running theme of The Demonata series having slightly naff pages :S steve  king  89  19:56, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Bec
Bec should have her own page. Anyone agree or disadree I dissagree they should be all together XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.166.19.153 (talk) 11:11, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Family Blood
Why is there a sectn called Blood Family, what are they called that for? steve king  89  23:14, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

I haven't a clue.--Fireball07 (talk) 11:05, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Merge with articles about individual characters and groups of characters
Neither of the individual characters or groups in this franchise are sufficiently notable to justify their own articles. As such, the following articles should be merged here: Vein (character), Artery (character), Juni Swan, Lord Loss (character), Old Creatures, Beranabus (character), Dervish Grady, Death (The Demonata), Bec MacConn, Kernel Fleck, Grubbs Grady, and Demons (The Demonata). Neelix (talk) 15:52, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree with you in the most. I think that Bec, Grubbs and Kernel should keep their own pages based on that they are the series' three main characters and also because of the large amount of information on their pages would tend to imply they are notable. Having said that, the information on either own pages is quite poorly written (as are most Demonata pages) with mainly non-registered users adding in small sentences - thus causing the page to describe almost a step by step account of each of the characters. I say Merge the others, but Keep the Bec, Kernel and Grubbs pages; although these need a lot of reworking done to them.  steve king  89  00:26, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The Grubbs Grady article is completely unreferenced and should be deleted. Article size doesn't demonstrate notability -- references do. Is there a reason the page shouldn't be re-nominated for deletion? -- Mikeblas (talk) 18:39, 13 July 2014 (UTC)