Talk:List of Walt Disney Pictures films/Archive 2

Future releases
Pinging previous participants, , ,. I think it's simply ridiculous to have a huge list of films about which a single announcement was made even more than a decade ago but nothing ever happened. Many of these are mere passing mentions or single announcements that a director/producer is working on an untitled film, that a writer may be coming up with a script, or even an actor signed on to a role, but in a huge number of these cases, it simply died. Studios begin work on countless projects that don't end up panning out because the script isn't good, producers land other projects, or the studio simply changes its mind. To say that all these films with a one-time news release from 2013, 2010, even 2005 is "under development" is a LIE! Several of the sources are simply that Disney bought the rights to a book or that they're in talks with a writer or director, NOT that a film is actually in pre-production or pre-pre-production. Sure the original Lilo and Stitch took a while from conception to release (there haven't been any updates since last year's announcement it would be remade), but it's preposterous to claim that all of these must be retained indefinitely. That's the beauty of Wikipedia: when there's actual evidence that production is moving forward, something can be re-added! But as it stands, there needs to be a time limit or minimum criteria for stage of development for inclusion, not over 100 films for which there is zero evidence that they actual "future releases". Reywas92Talk 06:43, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
 * THANK you. Until it's clear that the project is actually in production, it shouldn't be listed. Trivialist (talk) 09:48, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Disagree strongly with 's statement. Yes there needs to be some 'weeding out' of films that didn't ever have a film announced to be in-development. No, we aren't going to just delete all the movies that aren't in pre-production yet. This specific section is meant to list the films that are in VARIOUS stages of development. If we need to make a section specifically for what's in development (as has been done on similar articles) - this would be beneficial to say the least. Should definitely sort-out films that the rights to a book were simply purchased (as had pointed out).--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 20:37, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Why should projects in development even be listed? The article title is "List of Walt Disney Pictures films", not "List of Walt Disney Picture films and projects in development." Trivialist (talk) 20:42, 8 September 2019 (UTC)


 * the article reader would have a sense/foresight of what the studio has upcoming/in development. This has been done on other similar pages.--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 21:10, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
 * So please propose a clear, narrow standard for inclusion. Perhaps a source within the past two years that puts them in pre-production? Merely having a script requested or a director hired does not make something a film yet. Please share these similar pages in case they have a usable standard or I need to clear out outdated junk there too. Reywas92Talk 21:50, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Agreed it needs to be weeded out. I would say a good place to start is removing films that have no creatives involved (no director, no screenwriter, no studios, etc). Once those are cleared out, we can discuss what should remain and what can go. A short paragraph, perhaps in pros could be at the bottom of the page stating that 'projects' Disney has purchased rights to - but have not doing anything with them. Perhaps a 'Potential projects' sub-section(?).--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 05:23, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Please do not re-add false information to the article in the middle of this. You have reinserted lies to the article, incorrectly suggesting that all of these years-old project announcements, rights purchases, and untitled script ideas are actually "in development" when there is no evidence that that is true. A good place to start is to assume that anything that has not begun filming is not actually happening, seeing how there are 82 films released in the 2010s so far (including Disneynature and other studios) and a whopping 114 supposedly in development. Start from nothing and then add those which have multiple sources over a period of time indicating they are actually moving forward even beyond hiring people. The limited number of dates in the 2020s section makes clear that even a small fraction of this number is unlikely and any assumptions about which it may be is speculation unfit for this article. No, this is a list of films, not projects Disney has the rights to. It is not a film until it is made or is at least in production, and to include such is peering into a WP:CRYSTALBALL. Reywas92Talk 07:37, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Animated action
Many Live action animated films on this page Christopher Robin or  BFG  are being labelled as live action also some animated films such as Fantasia 2000 is being called live action animated.

I have two proposals

One we use a definition for what makes a animated film for example the academy awards definition witch states An animated feature film is defined as a motion picture with a running time of more than 40 minutes, in which movement and characters' performances are created using a frame-by-frame technique. Motion capture by itself is not an animation technique. In addition, a significant number of the major characters must be animated, and animation must figure in no less than 75 per cent of the picture's running time.|source=—Rule Seven – Special Rules for the Animated Feature Film Award: I. Definition.

Two we remove it all together Fanoflionking 23:04, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Or add an additional category for modern motion capture filmmaking or whatever but the first suggestion works. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater - this is valid information for the reader and doesn't need to be removed just because some movies don't fit "A" or "L" perfectly. Reywas92Talk 19:12, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

I personal would go by the frist as that will give us a clearer idea, I will it in the morning Fanoflionking  00:32, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Film Type
Films like "The Jungle Book" (2016) are listed as L which means they are live-action films. However films like that seem more suitable for the H category because they are "Hybrid films with live action and animation". Why are most of the Disney remakes not under that category?4Corry11 (talk) 22:13, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * see the edit comment histories for this one. The general consensus has been that any live-action styled/dominant film is listed as such. Hybrid classification has been used for films with live action and traditional animation combined. The modern-day cinema productions us CGI in much of their production. This does not render the film a hybrid. If it did - all modern-day movies would be 'hybrids'.--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 20:42, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Ok then why is G-force under H if the only animation is CGI? --4Corry11 (talk) 01:42, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
 * frankly, it shouldn't be. This whole article/list needs restructuring. Far too many limitations, exceptions, and exclusions in it. Because Disney produces various studios' films -- the list needs to be completely overhauled.--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 20:02, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 29 October 2019
67.251.11.100 (talk) 15:45, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Thomas and Friends Annie Potts as Narrator Martin Sherman as Thomas Percy and James
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 15:59, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Article restructuring
This has been stated before, and frankly this is getting to be to complex. The massive number of restrictions regarding what can and cannot go on this article's table is ridiculous. All films made by Disney should be included in one list. The way that we can distinguish studios from others would be to have a redirect of susidiaryDisneyA article, to this page, with a section of said subsidiary here-in. In addition to this it would place all of the same content (i.e.: Disney movies) in one article. This is obviously a HUGE undertaking, but with a combined effort to do so - this should be accomplishable. The first step would be: which Disney subsidiaries are notable enough to have their own sub-section? Walt Disney Animation, Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures, Marvel Studios, Lucasfilm Ltd, Touchstone Pictures, The Muppet Studio, Pixar Animation, 20th Century Fox, etc... thoughts?--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 19:24, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Additionally, it's time for the color-coding to go. The colors are too fan-page like. Instead of this, within the table we can have a column that stats what kind of movie it is (straight-to-video, live action, animation, live action/2D animation hybrid, documentary, etc).--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 19:24, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
 * There already exists an article with that very purpose and such efforts should be addressed and constructed there. This article is fairly simple; it is only a list of films produced/released by/under the Walt Disney Pictures banner regardless of the form of exhibition. That being said, whether we should include direct-to-video films that also fall under this requirement (alongside the current theatrical and streaming releases) merits discussion and I believe now they should be included in order to maintain that aforementioned purpose. I agree that color-coding designations should be removed, along with maybe the Disneynature films since that is a separate label. ~ Jedi94  ( Want to tell me something? ) 04:56, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 18 November 2019
I found two titles of Disney movies that are not included in this list. An Extremely Goofy Movie - 02/29/2000 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Extremely_Goofy_Movie Bambi II - 01/26/2006 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bambi_II

I would like to see these two titles added to the list

Bill Parker 2600:1700:1AD0:3860:BCCD:3153:8B13:939F (talk) 20:58, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: Per the lead this list does not include direct-to-video releases. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 23:19, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Tinker Bell and Bambi 2
Although they were only released at the El Capitan Theater in Los Angeles in the US, every Tinker Bell movies have been released in theaters internationally. They should be included in this list.

The same goes for Bambi 2. It was a direct-to-video in the US but it was released in the theaters in many countries around the world.

Of course, there wouldn't even be a debate if we just include every Walt Disney Pictures direct-to-video films. Now that we include the Disney+ films, there is absolutely no reason to omit the direct-to-video ones. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DashInc (talk • contribs) 12:37, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

The Lion King (2019) = animated / The Jungle Book (2016) = hybrid
User:DisneyMetalhead recently edited this list to say that The Lion King (2019) and The Jungle Book (2016) are live action films.

I believe the correct classification would be:


 * The Lion King (2019) = animated film (the lions are computer-generated, there were no real lions filmed)
 * The article about the film currently describes it as "a photorealistic computer animated remake".
 * The article is currently in 5 categories with "animated" in the title (2019 computer-animated films, 3D animated films, American computer-animated films, Category:Animated coming-of-age films, and Category:Animated films about revenge).
 * The Jungle Book (2016) = hybrid film (because Mowgli is human and the animals are CGI)
 * The article about the film currently describes it as "a live-action/CGI film".
 * The article is in Category:Films with live action and animation.

The lions in The Lion King are verifiably computer-generated, much like Frozen and other movies, except this time using a photorealistic style. This film is the result of the work of animators. It would be a live action movie if Disney filmed real lions.

I'm aware that some live action movies use some CGI. For instance, Avengers: Infinity War has some CGI characters like Thanos and Rocket. These films are still mostly live action with relatively little CGI. If Marvel created a new movie with only Thanos and Rocket interacting with other CGI characters, it would be an animated film.

If a film uses much CGI and much live action, as in The Jungle Book, it's a hybrid film.

Related discussions:
 * The Lion King (2019) has been recently discussed at Talk:List of highest-grossing animated films, because that film is present in the list of highest-grossing animated films.
 * I also opened a discussion at User talk:DisneyMetalhead.

--Daniel Carrero (talk) 02:03, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

you are using some very specific ultimatums and statements to classify hybrid vs live action vs animation. Your comparison to Frozen is poor, as they are not similar in the least bit. Yes, The Lion King has CGI animals. Yes the majority of it is CGI, but what film isn't these days?? Do you honestly think that the only CGI in Avengers: Infinity War / Avengers: Endgame was Thanos and Rocket? The large majority of that film was CGI. That is how the filmmaking business works in the modern-age. No, this does not make those films "hybrids". For the sake of this table, which can have any parameters that the key/legend specifies - hybrid movies are live action, mixed with traditional 2D animation. Animation is cartoon-styled filmmaking. You cannot logically state that any blockbuster film is not predominantly CGI. Your examples are poor in this regard.--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 03:12, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The MPAA have strict criteria for what they count as an animated film: "An animated feature film is defined as a motion picture with a running time of more than 40 minutes, in which movement and characters’ performances are created using a frame-by-frame technique. Motion capture by itself is not an animation technique. In addition, a significant number of the major characters must be animated, and animation must figure in no less than 75 percent of the picture’s running time."
 * The key difference here is that even in CGI heavy films such as The Jungle Book the bulk of the film is not created using frame-by-frame techniques. They are usually filmed on blue screen and the background and CGI is matted in afterwards. Ironically The Lion King is actually one of the least ambiguous films around in terms of classification: it did not utilise live-action filming i.e. it is animated as defined by our general understanding of the term but also by the MPAA's own rules. Betty Logan (talk) 14:10, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
 * That's fine and reinforces my statement that Jungle Book nor any live action film with CGI/motion-capture use is not a hybrid. What I am stating is that for the purposes of this chart - where The Lion King is a live-action styled photorealistic film - it has been agreed/discussed ad nauseam that the film should be classified as-is: a live-action styled film.--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 17:14, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Where it has been discussed? I didn't find that discussion in this talk page. In any event, I don't think an animated movie like The Lion King (2019) should be called "live action" since this would be a false statement and it would contradict other articles, including the article of the movie itself.
 * If for some reason we wanted to use the label "L" for photorealistic animated movies on this table as a one-time exception anyway, the label should read "L = "Live action films, or photorealistic animated films". I'm not advocating for this exactly, but it would at least be accurate.
 * By the way, Dinosaur (2000) also uses realistic CGI animation, just not on the level of The Lion King (2019). It's currently labeled "A" for animated film. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 20:45, 23 August 2019 (UTC)


 * These films are neither live-action (the animals are computer generated) nor 2D cell-animated (they are not hand-drawn or on filmed on cells). They are computer animated to imitate reality. Maybe a new category is needed: (near-)realistic computer animation. Perhaps splitting animation into 2D cell animation and 3D computer animation, whether realistic or not. Then Snow White and Cars would be in different categories, and rightly so. Danielklein (talk) 06:28, 30 August 2019 (UTC)


 * I support the idea of splitting animation into 2D cell animation and 3D computer animation. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 06:41, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I like 's idea. The problem with it, is as filmmaking evolves - there will be too many classifications. The color-coded categories are rather excessive in my opinion. Someone who wants to know about....say Swiss Family Robinson for example, would simply click the link - which takes them to the film's article where it tells them/shows them it is live-action. I would argue that doing away with categories altogether, would eliminate all this debate/confusion.--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 21:08, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't think so. The idea would be splitting one current category (animated films) into two (traditional and CGI). Many kinds of movie categories already exist, but we don't need to list all of them in this page.
 * Disney appears to be most famous for its animated films. If this page listed all movies without any labels or categories, I'd suggest creating List of Walt Disney Pictures animated films. (some page to list all Disney animated films together, as opposed to current separated lists of different studios, such as List of Walt Disney Animation Studios films and List of Pixar films) --Daniel Carrero (talk) 05:50, 10 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Also, .... Dinosaur is not at all photo-realistic. It's stylized and more cartoony. Poor comparison.--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 21:09, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I think no one here said that Dinosaur is photorealistic. I said "realistic". Although some sources call it "photorealistic". I think that was a good comparison, because Dinosaur is not quite on the level of The Lion King. Both are quite realistic if not for the cartoon animals. Arguably, the talking lions make even The Lion King (2019) cartoony to some extent.
 * I wonder what we would do if we got some more examples of animated films between the levels of realism of Dinosaur (2000) and The Lion King (2019). If we start calling the less realistic ones "animated" and the more realistic ones "live action", it would be interesting to see where we would draw the line.
 * If we had a label for CGI films, it should include both Dinosaur (2000) and The Lion King (2019). --Daniel Carrero (talk) 05:50, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

The Golden Globes have officially recognized The Lion King as an animated film, in their list of nominations. Using this source, we should relabel it as "A". Anterras (talk) 19:40, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 11 February 2020
Change "Future releases" > "Onward" from L (live-action) to A (animated), it is not a live-action film.

WornItsKeyItem (talk) 20:19, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done LittlePuppers (talk) 23:30, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Add Roadside Romeo
This movie was made by Walt Disney Pictures India in 2008 and is missing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roadside_Romeo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ripner (talk • contribs) 22:14, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

A film is missing from the list
The 2000 movie titled Whispers: An Elephant's Tale is not in the list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.223.243.77 (talk) 19:25, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 5 June 2020
Andrew Gunn is not set to produce the upcoming film Magic Camp. 69.196.139.144 (talk) 00:08, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. TheImaCow (talk) 10:50, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 7 June 2020
There was supposed to be a space between the film's title Hamilton and the ‡ symbol. 69.196.139.144 (talk) 01:01, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅ ~ Jedi94  ( Want to tell me something? ) 15:44, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 15 June 2020
Andrew Gunn won't be involved in producing Magic Camp. Can anybody remove Gunn Films from the Magic Camp section? 104.222.126.88 (talk) 20:34, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. --allthefoxes (Talk) 02:43, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 18 June 2020
Secret Society of Second-Born Royals has been moved by three months to September 25, 2020. 216.154.40.40 (talk) 01:34, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 02:06, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 18 June 2020
An Untitled Brian Fee Project is set to be released on June 18, 2021 and will be animated. 216.154.40.40 (talk) 23:44, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — Tartan357   ( Talk ) 07:08, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 20 June 2020
Can somebody remove Encanto from this page? 216.154.40.40 (talk) 16:04, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

No. It has a source to verify its existence. Why do you want it removed?Crboyer (talk) 16:23, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 29 June 2020
There is no link to Encanto 216.154.40.40 (talk) 20:16, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
 * The link is red because there is no article for that film. When someone creates the article, the link will automatically turn blue.  RudolfRed (talk) 00:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

LION KING 2 IS MISSING HERE!!!
IS IT POSSIBLE THAT LION KING 2 IS MISSING FROM THIS LIST?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.226.5.167 (talk) 08:11, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 12 July 2020
The link to Disneynature no longer exists. Can you remove the link, please? 45.72.248.6 (talk) 22:18, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Section no longer exists on target page. Linking it to the top of the page would create a WP:DUPLINK. Unlinking is appropriate. Thanks! Matt Fitzpatrick (talk) 09:18, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 24 July 2020
Can you remove the extra column from the section of films from the 2000s, please? 45.72.235.141 (talk) 17:52, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

I'm not seeing any extra columns. What are you referring to? Crboyer (talk) 18:04, 24 July 2020 (UTC) The Column on the right of the section.

I think Starzoner just took care of it. It was that hard to see. Crboyer (talk) 18:04, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 25 July 2020
Andrew Gunn is not involved in Magic Camp because there were no citations for Gunn to produce. 45.72.235.141 (talk) 13:43, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ~ Amkgp  💬  18:40, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 26 July 2020
The citation in the slot of Magic Camp was supposed to go after the ‡ symbol. 45.72.235.141 (talk) 17:27, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 23:40, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 29 July 2020
There are the letters TBA when they are supposed to be capitals. 216.154.30.200 (talk) 11:41, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅. ◢  Ganbaruby!   (Say hi!) 12:08, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 28 August 2020
This page is missing the Disney film 'The Prince and the Pauper,' produced in 1962. Joliejacq14 (talk) 19:43, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Was it released under the Disney name or under one if the other Disney studios such as Buena Vista etc? This list is only for films released under "Disney" and not any other studio Disney owns.  RudolfRed (talk) 20:01, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
 * It was an episode of Walt Disney's Wonderful World of Color, but it was released theatrically (I think) in Europe.Crboyer (talk) 20:04, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Melmann 20:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Dasavathaaram - 2008
Please delete Dasavathaaram (2008) from the list as it has absolutely nothing to do with Disney. It's not a Walt Disney Pictures film. It's not even a film from any of the other studios from Disney (Touchstone, 20th Century Fox...).


 * Yes check.svg Done ~ Jedi94  ( Want to tell me something? ) 08:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

On the other hand, there are still these international Disney-branded films missing: The Secret of the Magic Gourd - 2007 (China) https://www.chroniquedisney.fr/film/2007-gourde.htm High School Musical - El Desafio - 2008 (Argentina) https://www.chroniquedisney.fr/film/2008-HSM-Argentine.htm High School Musical - El Desafio - 2008 (Mexico) https://www.chroniquedisney.fr/film/2008-HSM-Mexique.htm Spangas on Survival - 2009 (Netherlands) https://www.chroniquedisney.fr/film/2009-spangas.htm High School Musical - O Desafio - 2010 (Brazil) https://www.chroniquedisney.fr/film/2010-HSM-Bresil.htm High School Musical China - 2010 (China) https://www.chroniquedisney.fr/film/2010-HSM-Chine.htm Foeksia de Miniheks - 2011 (Netherlands) https://www.chroniquedisney.fr/film/2010-fuschia.htm Happiness Is... - 2015 (Russia) https://www.chroniquedisney.fr/film/2015-happiness.htm The Last Warrior - 2017 (Russia) https://www.chroniquedisney.fr/film/2017-last-warrior.htm The Dreaming Man - 2017 (China) https://www.chroniquedisney.fr/film/2017-dreaming-man.htm Happiness Is... Part 2 - 2019 (Russia) https://www.chroniquedisney.fr/film/2019-happiness2.htm

— Preceding unsigned comment added by DashInc (talk • contribs) 12:27, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

List of Walt Disney Pictures theatrical films
I'd like to request a name change for this article from it's current title to List of Walt Disney Pictures theatrical films and remove the films not released theatrically in North America like Dasavathaaram and Disney+ original films like Lady and the Tramp. &mdash; Cody Fearless-Lee Talk 8:22PM - August 30, 2020  —Preceding undated comment added 00:22, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * There's no reason that Walt Disney Pictures films released theatrically outside of North America should be excluded. Trivialist (talk) 02:04, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I suggested excluding them to make the article less confusing for Disney aficionados. However, the Disney+ movies should go as not only do they have an article of their own, but if they are on here because they were made by Walt Disney Pictures, then that's saying the direct-to-video movies should end up on here too. &mdash; Cody Fearless-Lee Talk 8:48PM - August 31, 2020  —Preceding undated comment added 00:48, 1 September 2020 (UTC)


 * I oppose your suggestion, however I acknowledge that this list is currently not representing all films released or produced by WDP. Picsovina (talk) 09:21, 14 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Oppose the proposed request as well. However, you are indeed correct in that there are some direct-to-video films produced by Walt Disney Pictures that are missing from this list—mostly because no one has taken up the task of adding them. ~ Jedi94  ( Want to tell me something? ) 08:48, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Co-funded Movies
This is a request upon another editor's suggestion.

Would movies that Disney co-funded with another studio count for this page? I'm asking because Walt Disney Studios Japan |(credited as Walt Disney Japan or Buena Vista Home Entertainment in English releases) have co-funded 10% of all of Studio Ghibli's movies since My Neighbors the Yamadas and also co-funded Ghost in the Shell 2: Innocence and Studio Ponoc's movies. But technically, do those kind of movies count for this page or not? Disney did dub a majority of Ghibli movies into english (including some released before the deal but were produced after the deal was announced) as well.

Luigitehplumber (talk) 14:01, 23 September 2020 (UTC)


 * In my opinion those Ghibli movies should be included here which were released by Walt Disney Pictures in North America. I added them back, because the Walt Disney Studios list also acknowledges them as movies released under the WDP label. Co-funding is different than co-production in my opinion, because the first is only a financial contribution, but co-production means creative control too. Picsovina (talk) 07:27, 24 September 2020 (UTC)


 * I guess this would exclude the films GKIDS released in the US (although Disney did distribute them in France and I think Taiwan as well). Luigitehplumber (talk) 15:48, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 6 October 2020
There are links to Gunn Films and Team Todd you forgot to add on the right side of the slot of Magic Camp. 76.10.139.234 (talk) 21:23, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:47, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 11 October 2020
Please Disney's Newsies: The Broadway Musical (2017) to the list. Thank you. 104.59.89.142 (talk) 00:44, 11 October 2020 (UTC)


 * ❌. Please be specific with where you want to add it and provide enough detail for a full entry. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon &bull; videos) 01:18, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 December 2020 (2)
Please add Flora & Ulysses to the section with future releases. 104.195.199.235 (talk) 13:25, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅ Starzoner (talk) 15:26, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 December 2020
Please remove the 20th Century Studios films from this article. 104.195.199.235 (talk) 01:16, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Andrew nyr  talk  contribs  05:12, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 December 2020 (3)
Please add the ‡ symbol next to the title Flora & Ulysses. It is a Disney+ original film. 104.195.199.235 (talk) 22:02, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Andrew nyr  talk  contribs  05:15, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 16 November 2020
Gunn Films was never involved in Magic Camp. 45.72.240.178 (talk) 00:13, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅. Only mentions I see is IMDb, but that's unreliable. Andrew Gunn isn't mentioned anywhere where Magic Camp is, and Rotten Tomatoes only lists Team Todd too. Removed because it's slightly dubious. ◢  Ganbaruby!   (Say hi!) 15:16, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 15 December 2020
Please add a space between the title Flora & Ulysses and the ‡ symbol, and it has to go after the ]]. 104.195.199.235 (talk) 02:21, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅. ◢  Ganbaruby!   (Say hi!) 15:17, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 15 January 2021
Please remove the ‡ symbol on the right side of the title Shrunk, it is a theatrically released film. 69.165.158.97 (talk) 19:18, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made.. According to the article on the film, the movie is not finished yet, let alone released.  The slashfilm article is from 2019 announcing the film in development.  RudolfRed (talk) 01:26, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 21 January 2021
On "Number of films per decade", it said there was six films made by Walt Disney Pictures, but I counted seven. 73.137.33.36 (talk) 17:55, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. There are several entries in that table that are 6. Which one are you suggesting to change?  RudolfRed (talk) 01:19, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 30 January 2021
The Secret of the Magic Gourd is missing. 2A00:23C8:A297:5F01:2421:3FCC:B226:3065 (talk) 00:12, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅, and thank you very much!  P.I. Ellsworth   ed.  put'r there 15:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 18 February 2021
The Secret of the Magic Gourd was released in mainland China in 2007. It was later released in the U.S. direct-to-video in 2009. Could you add a footnote explaining this? 2A00:23C8:A297:5F01:40A:DF80:7A99:E496 (talk) 12:59, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Please can you provide a reliable source for that? Thanks, DesertPipeline (talk) 13:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * [1 ] [2 ] [3 ]
 * 2A00:23C8:A297:5F01:40A:DF80:7A99:E496 (talk) 13:52, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Appreciated. I'm often wary of visiting unknown links, so I can't check the veracity of the sources you've provided, but hopefully someone else will come along soon enough who can do that. I'll keep an eye on this page though. Regards, DesertPipeline (talk) 15:39, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Checked and updated. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:23, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, ScottishFinnishRadish :) DesertPipeline (talk) 07:45, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 18 May 2021
Please add the link to Disenchanted. 216.154.8.89 (talk) 17:37, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:44, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 12 June 2021
There is a box missing on the right side of the slot of Disenchanted. 216.154.8.89 (talk) 18:16, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done MadGuy7023 (talk) 23:12, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 7 August 2021
Hello,

Just noticed that in within the '1950s' table, one of the movie links does not take you directly to the top of corresponding movie page.

Table: 1950s Movie: Zorro the Avenger

Current Link Address: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zorro_(1957_TV_series)#Theatrical True Link Address: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zorro_(1957_TV_series)

Kind Regards, Lshmcon Lshmcon (talk) 13:37, 7 August 2021 (UTC)


 * But it does direct one to the paragraph about the film. That's important. In the future, don't answer your own edit requests. Crboyer (talk) 17:01, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 20 August 2021
Zigmund Sanchez (talk) 03:21, 20 August 2021 (UTC) please let me edit
 * Not unless you explain what you plan to edit. Crboyer (talk) 03:40, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Diary of a Wimpy Kid (2021)
Should the new Diary of a Wimpy Kid be placed here? Since it will be released on Disney+ under the Disney banner brand? As confirmed by a new poster? 0Detail-Attention215 (talk) 16:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

I don't think so, because it's made by 20th Century Fox. Plus, it would only be on here if it was co-produced by Walt Disney Pictures. ZX2006XZ (talk • contribs) 14:20, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

"In development" section
I think there should be an "In development" section for this article because on List of Walt Disney Studios films (2020-2029), there are Walt Disney Pictures movies in the In development section (including a Robin Hood and a Bambi remake). Could you add that section to this article? ZX2006XZ (talk • contribs) 21:17, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 25 September 2021 (2)
Please change the link of Hocus Pocus (1993 film) to Hocus Pocus (1993 film). 108.175.234.27 (talk) 21:28, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:21, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 25 September 2021
There is a box missing on the right side of the slot of Robin Hood. 108.175.234.27 (talk) 20:48, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting wait.svg Already done ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:19, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

I was talking about the live-action remake, not the cartoon film. 45.72.220.155 (talk) 18:15, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 3 October 2021
There are two boxes missing, one on the right side of the slot of 61 and one on the right side of the slot of the live-action adaptation of Robin Hood. 45.72.220.155 (talk) 22:18, 3 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.Signed, I Am Chaos (talk) 20:16, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 21 October 2021
Please change 20th Century Fox Animation to 20th Century Animation. 209.221.91.106 (talk) 14:33, 21 October 2021 (UTC)


 * ✅ I have changed the link from the redirect to the new page. Signed, I Am Chaos (talk) 20:17, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 25 October 2021
Please change Hocus Pocus (1993 film) to Hocus Pocus 2. 209.221.91.106 (talk) 13:21, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅. Heartmusic678 (talk) 12:09, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

3 Ghibli are Walt Disney Pictures films
Those 3 Ghibli which are the only ones released under the Disney banner: Spirited Away - 2001 (released under the Walt Disney Studios banner) Ponyo - 2008 (Walt Disney Pictures) The Secret World of Arrietty (Walt Disney Pictures)

Please can someone add them to the list?


 * Yes check.svg Done ZX2006XZ (talk) 12:15, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 October 2021
In addition to Brian Fee, other people directing Pixar feature films include Kristen Lester, Aphton Corbin and Rosanna Sullivan. Please add "Untitled Aphton Corbin film", "Untitled Kristen Lester film" and "Untitled Rosanna Sullivan film" to the "In development" section. 216.154.21.179 (talk) 21:13, 13 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the template. It does not appear there is consensus for this. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:16, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 11 October 2021
I would like to edit this page to include The Hunchback of Notre Dame Two as it is a Disney direct to video film made by Walt Disney Pictures . 166.181.86.26 (talk) 14:15, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Curbon7 (talk) 19:18, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Are you sure The Hunchback of Notre Dame 2 is produced by Walt Disney Pictures? ZX2006XZ (talk) 15:17 6 November 2021 (UTC) ZX2006XZ (talk) 15:17, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Done, Curbon7 ZX2006XZ (talk) 19:02, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 5 February 2022
Please add missing disney movies 101 problems of Hercules 1966 Run appaloosa run 1966 Justin Morgan had a horse 1973 Love leads the way 1984 166.182.86.70 (talk) 13:54, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:02, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Production status column
, I propose bringing back the "Production Status" column in the upcoming films section. ZX2006XZ (talk) 13:02, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:37, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Walt Disney Pictures 2011 horizontal logo.svg

Request to revert article to "List of Disney theatrical films" or make a separate article on theatrical Disney films with Disney+ original movies
This article has become too convoluted with direct-to-video films, international movies nobodies heard of, and Disney+ films. The latter I used to not mind until all of the other non-theatrical Disney films appear on here. -- Cody Fearless-Lee (talk) 6:26PM - December 4, 2021


 * I 1,000% agree with you . I have no idea how/why someone went in and added straight to video movies. Definitely not at all what this article was made to be. I have previously stated that this article is a mess and have attempted various times over the years to clean it up. One of the recurring issues is the categories as well. For what reason we need a color-coded category, is anyone's guess. I have brought this up as well numerous times. I agree that this article should be about theatrical/Disney+ releases. Meanwhile straight to video releases should/could be on their own page, or on a page encompassing all Disney films. Other editors need to state here why they believe this article merits all of the terrible spin-off/sequels made by Toon Disney Studios.--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 03:02, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Encanto
Encanto is one of (if not the most) popular Disney movie ever produced. The 4th song, "We don't talk about Bruno" is (as of 2022) the most popular song in the United States. It stars Mirabel Madrigal, a 15-year-old girl who didn't get a magic ability like the rest of her family. I haven't really watched the movie. Add what happened! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:C290:8040:D112:821D:3ACA:9E5A (talk) 21:24, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Go to here to find out what happened. $chnauzer 21:37, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * @Special:Contributions/2600:1700:C290:8040:D112:821D:3ACA:9E5A; your suggestion makes no sense. This article is a list article. It is not about Encanto, nor does it include plots of any of the films. Follow User:Crboyer's suggestion above^ for your reading pleasures.--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 03:08, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Clean-up...AGAIN (2022)
This has been an ongoing discussion for years, and this article continues to become messy every time I come to "check on it". For whatever reason (who knows why), we have started adding straight-to-home video releases in this table, while the consensus was previously to only include theatrical and Disney+ released movies. The reason for this is that they were made by Walt Disney Pictures (the studio). Any film included required a source that stated it was made by the identified studio. This article needs to be cleaned up, unless editors can provide a logical reason as to why we keep including these movies. I suggest that an additional list article for ALL Disney films (regardless of the studio) be made, for the convenience of readers/editors who want to see every possible Disney movie. An alternative would be to have list articles for theatrical releases vs straight-to-home video releases. Thoughts?--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 03:12, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I would further suggest again, that the color-coded/classifications of these films is fan-page territory and problematic. Some of the reasons behind this is the disputed classifications of movies themselves. For example: Some editors repeatedly classify movies that have CGI characters as a "hybrid" movie. This becomes an issue given the fact that most modern-day movies have characters that are created through CGI special effects. We cannot classify every film this way. We need to either completely do away with the classifications color-coding, or come to a more definitive definition for each of these film types.--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 03:36, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Pinging all recently (last 3 calander months) contributing editors hereafter to discuss what has happened to this page, and/or suggest resolutions to this mess. Users: Lowercase sigmabot III, Community Tech bot, Crboyer, SineBot, SpecialContributions-2600:1700:C290:8040:D112:821D:3ACA:9E5A, ZX2006XZ, ScottishFinnishRadish, SpecialContributions-166.182.86.70, Chrystensen V., Cardei0129597, Picsovina, nickelodeon745, Rugveda Karthik SSS, Jedi94, WikiCleanerBot, Qwerfjkl (bot), wbm1058, Maxbmogs, Voicebox64, Karamellpudding1999, SwoopSwing, Egsan Bacon, AnomieBOT, CommonsDelinker, ImageRemovalBot, Openmy, Narky Blert (alt), KRCThree, D334892, NathanGamerdog, FranCorAy, Oculi, Pamzeis, InfiniteNexus, Star Mississippi, and/or TheDeadRatInTheCornerOfMyRoom52. --DisneyMetalhead (talk) 03:36, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * On the subject of Hybrid Films, we should narrow it down to Traditional Animation/Live-Action films. As I've repeatedly said, what live-action film doesn't use CGI these days?$chnauzer 03:44, 17 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I agree, Hybrid films should only be live action/animation films, like Who Framed Roger Rabbit. However, there really isn't too many of true Hybrids to justify such a section, so I do agree with DisneyMetalhead that we need to change the classifications color-coding. Cardei012597 (talk) 03:51, 17 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I also agree that we should make list articles for theatrical releases vs straight-to-home video (and/or Disney+ exclusive) releases. Cardei012597 (talk) 03:55, 17 March 2022 (UTC)


 * However, I do believe the straight-to-home video page might become stale, due to recent (2010s-present) Disney films only releasing in theaters and/or Disney+. Basically, just the clamshell era of straight-to-video releases, rather than any further updates for future (upcoming) films. Cardei012597 (talk) 04:02, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * We might not need the coloring system, seeing as how live action films take up roughly 75% of the page while animated and hybrid are about 20% and documentary and nature films take up 5%. Secondly, I would suggest combining direct-to-video with straight-to-streaming as one thing (they do both involve skipping the theaters to going straight to one's home living room), but I don't know if that would be even more confusing. Voicebox64 (talk) 04:37, 17 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I agree with you, Voicebox. The coloring system as it is now is not really all that helpful. I also suggested doing just that with direct-to-video and straight-to-streaming, since it is the same concept of skipping theaters and releasing straight to a home release. This could however split apart films from the same studio, creating confusion. For example, both Pixar and DisneyNature have released both theatrical and straight to streaming films. Some editors might think both lists are incomplete without all of Pixar's films or all of DisneyNature's films. Maybe, since there is already lists for all of Pixar/DisneyNature/Animated, ect, we should trim down this list to only Disney's live action films (not co-produced by another studio or one that already has a Wiki list of their own). Thoughts? Cardei012597 (talk) 16:27, 17 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I'd say that all of the direct-to-video/Disney+ films should be kept in. Also, I never really understood why there was a coloring system to begin with. I mean, Paramount Pictures, Columbia Pictures, Warner Bros., Universal Pictures, and 20th Century Studios don't have it. ZX2006XZ (talk) 16:52, 17 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I think we should get rid of the coloring classification system too. Just look at List of Walt Disney Studios films; it works fine without it. Serves no real function anymore beyond fan-service, which is what I feel some of these Disney-related articles are succumbing to. Also, if it helps, there already exists a separate article that was intended for direct-to-video films: List of Disney feature-length home entertainment releases. ~ Jedi94  ( Want to tell me something? ) 15:17, 18 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Going by the complete agreement above, I will make the bold choice in saying I will now remove the coloring classification system of this page. If someone disagrees with me, they are welcome to revert the change and discuss this further. Cardei012597 (talk) 01:43, 3 April 2022 (UTC)


 * I completed the task of removing the coloring system, as discussed above. Now, we should move forward on what to do with the straight-to-home video releases, also discussed above. Cardei012597 (talk) 02:56, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Why would we remove the direct to video films if they were produced by Walt Disney Pictures? That's like removing the non-Us films and the Disney Plus films. ZX2006XZ (talk) 18:18, 3 April 2022 (UTC)


 * I am strongly neutral on whether to keep or remove the (clamshell) direct to video films. On one hand, I do understand User:DisneyMetalhead's situation that "the consensus was previously to only include theatrical and Disney+ released movies. The reason for this is that they were made by Walt Disney Pictures (the studio)". The direct to video films are from DisneyToon Studios. My guess is that DisneyMetalhead is asking to only keep the theatrical DisneyToon Studios films (A Goofy Movie, The Tiger Movie, ect.), but not the direct to video sequels specifically on this page. They are produced in a different animation department, for budget reasons. On your side though, they are under the Walt Disney banner, (the Disney castle logo), so I have decided to remain neutral on this part of the discussion. Cardei012597 (talk) 19:46, 3 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Disneytoon Studios movies are released under Walt Disney Pictures. ZX2006XZ (talk) 19:53, 3 April 2022 (UTC)


 * However, I can side with the idea User:Jedi94 suggested, which is to move the direct to video films from the current page to List of Disney feature-length home entertainment releases. Cardei012597 (talk) 19:53, 3 April 2022 (UTC)


 * I did find out that this page contains this in the intro "This list does not include... any direct-to-video releases unless they were produced under the main Disney banner". Production is a separate process from distribution/release. Yes, I agree all Disneytoon Studios movies are released by Walt Disney Studios, but only Disneytoon Studios were involved in the production of these films. I believe that is the issue at hand, whether a separate studio produces the film, but is released by Walt Disney Studios. I am leaning more to the idea User:Jedi94 suggested, after this insight. Cardei012597 (talk) 20:07, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Colour coding
Hi, up until yesterday this list was colour coded in a thin column down the left hand side. It showed whether a fim was Animation (this was a red box), Live Action, Mix of Animation/Live Action, Documentary, and I believe another category I can't remember. Any chance this could please be restored? I found it really useful while working my way through the list of films to watch. Thank you. 82.46.110.89 (talk) 21:28, 3 April 2022 (UTC)


 * This situation was discussed at the section titled "Clean-up...AGAIN (2022)". We decided as a group to remove the color system because "the color-coded/classifications of these films is fan-page territory and problematic. Some of the reasons behind this is the disputed classifications of movies themselves. For example: Some editors repeatedly classify movies that have CGI characters as a "hybrid" movie. This becomes an issue given the fact that most modern-day movies have characters that are created through CGI special effects. We cannot classify every film this way. We need to completely do away with the classifications color-coding". This action was done through a consensus with many editors. Cardei012597 (talk) 22:10, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Why hybrid vs animated vs live action indicator removed
The graph used to say if a movie is hybrid, live action, or fully animated but it was removed… why bring back please 128.119.202.1 (talk) 01:33, 4 April 2022 (UTC)


 * This situation was discussed at the section titled "Clean-up...AGAIN (2022)". We decided as a group to remove the color system because "the color-coded/classifications of these films is fan-page territory and problematic. Some of the reasons behind this is the disputed classifications of movies themselves. For example: Some editors repeatedly classify movies that have CGI characters as a "hybrid" movie. This becomes an issue given the fact that most modern-day movies have characters that are created through CGI special effects. We cannot classify every film this way. We need to completely do away with the classifications color-coding". This action was done through a consensus with many editors. Cardei012597 (talk) 02:05, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Should these be added?
Should these movies be added to the list? Gnomeo & Juliet, Strange Magic (film), Mars Needs Moms these were distributed by Disney similar to the Studio Ghibli films already on the list. Spies in Disguise, Ron's Gone Wrong these were released by disney after Fox was purchased by Diseny Andcbii (talk) 18:25, 27 April 2022 (UTC)


 * This is the list for Walt Disney Pictures. You must be talking about List of Disney theatrical animated feature films, which comprises of all thearical animated movies released by Disney (Walt Disney Pictures, Walt Disney Animation Studios, Pixar, Touchstone Pictures, and 20th Century Studios (since 2019). ZX2006XZ (talk) 18:35, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
 * No I'm talking about this list. Those films also happen to be on the animated films page, but they are missing here. There are a decent number of films on this list that are marked distribution only. Andcbii (talk) 19:21, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Mars Needs Moms was produced by Walt Disney Pictures and ImageMovers Digital, Gnomeo & Juliet was produced by Touchstone Pictures, and Strange Magic was produced by Touchstone Pictures and Lucasfilm. So to answer your question, no. They shouldn't be added, except for Mars Needs Moms, which is already on this list. ZX2006XZ (talk) 20:25, 27 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Ok, I think I understand, this list doesn't include films that were simply distributed by Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures Andcbii (talk) 12:48, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 27 May 2022
Please move Disenchanted to the dated films list. The release date is November 23, 2022. 99.209.40.250 (talk) 13:22, 27 May 2022 (UTC)


 * ✅ Went ahead and found a reliable source for it and updated list. — Sirdog (talk) 00:58, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

I really dislike that the color coding was removed.
Can we please revert to that again? I use this page regularly and it's almost useless without the color coding for animation, live action etc 2603:6011:221:F182:CC2C:B29:912:1F0 (talk) 14:22, 13 April 2022 (UTC)


 * This situation was discussed at the section titled "Clean-up...AGAIN (2022)". We decided as a group to remove the color system because "the color-coded/classifications of these films is fan-page territory and problematic. Some of the reasons behind this is the disputed classifications of movies themselves. For example: Some editors repeatedly classify movies that have CGI characters as a "hybrid" movie. This becomes an issue given the fact that most modern-day movies have characters that are created through CGI special effects. We cannot classify every film this way. We need to completely do away with the classifications color-coding". This action was done through a consensus with many editors. Cardei012597 (talk) 17:52, 13 April 2022 (UTC)


 * @2603:6011:221:F182:CC2C:B29:912:1F0 i still prefer the coloring. You can make it as simple as animation vs live action vs dpcumentary. 200.46.202.100 (talk) 23:49, 13 April 2022 (UTC)


 * @2603:6011:221:F182:CC2C:B29:912:1F0 also.. Please take into consideration the needs and desires of users.. Not just editors 200.46.202.100 (talk) 23:50, 13 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Please read the discussion above at "Clean-up...AGAIN (2022)" and list your concerns there. Cardei012597 (talk) 23:59, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Seriously, why take one of the best pages on the site and ruin it? Bring back the coloring for those of us who rely on this page. 24.235.39.96 (talk) 23:47, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Edit request

 * What I think should be changed: winner of Golden Globe Award for Best Animated Feature Film and nominee of the (Academy Award for Best Animated Feature)
 * Why it should be changed: The bolded part is incorrect from what is mentioned on the page in parentheses. 184.54.163.113 (talk) 15:26, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
 * References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):

184.54.163.113 (talk) 15:26, 11 June 2022 (UTC)


 * ✅ SSSB (talk) 11:54, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Edit requests (15 July 2022)
Please move Disenchanted from the undated films list to the current schedule. Its new release date is November 24, 2022. Also, please change Snow White's production status from "Filming" to "Post-production", because Rachel Zegler revealed that filming has wrapped. 209.221.91.116 (talk) 14:45, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * ✔️ for Disenchanted.
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: for Snow White please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  16:15, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Page Missing three movies
1. Escapade in Florence (1962) 2. The Horsemasters (1961) 3. The Computer Wore Tennis Shoes (1995) SecretCheri (talk) 17:42, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:45, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

the Colors
The color coding was introduced as an attempt to make the list easier to navigate, the main purpose of it was to pick out the nature film and the documentaries. They should probably be removed altogether but that also depends on whether other major studios film lists also includes documentaries not only films that are fictional. Far as the animation goes, the general ideas was that if film was sold as animation it would be labeled as such but live-action if it wasn't. Hybrid for films that sold themselves of both, the hybrid section will leave lot to be desired as films produced after 1980s/1990s. are often cgi galore or include some form of cgi upon closer inspection, unless they are drama films grounded in reality so I can see why this leaves lot to be desired. So I personally don't mind they stay or go, or if they are reintroduced. DoctorHver (talk) 01:40, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Missing movies
You are missing some movies I've got old vhs tapes I've watched since I was a child, these titles include: Justin Morgan had a horse 1972, love leads the way 1984, 101 problems of Hercules 1966, and run appaloosa run 1966. They are all full length films and need to be added if you are truly going to say this is the complete list of movies. 166.182.86.70 (talk) 13:49, 5 February 2022 (UTC)


 * @Special:Contributions/166.182.86.70; the reason these movies are not listed on this article, is that these are TV movies. They are not made by Walt Disney Pictures. Hope this helps clarify, m8!--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 03:05, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

I believe tv movies should be included on the list also SecretCheri (talk) 04:02, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

The London Connection
Does the film The London Connection belong on this list? --Joseph Hewes (talk) 07:31, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Explaining my edit
Here I added two films announced during D23, could someone add sources for them or undo the edit and redo it with sources (depending on which one is recommended or easiest). Thanks for the answer. Paramount1106 (talk) 00:23, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Suggested edit
The title of The Misadventures of Merlin Jones is misspelled. Someone should rectify this. 2603:8001:7102:BECA:D0A:E77:B990:8675 (talk) 07:38, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

"All disney films" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect All disney films and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 6 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 17:34, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

About Disenchanted
It appears on some pages, Disenchanted will be the last film to use the 2006 logo, with Strange World being the first to use the 2022 logo. 99.209.40.250 (talk) 16:28, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

100th anniversary logo
On the right side of Strange World, please add "first film to use the 2022 logo", next to "co-production with Walt Disney Animation Studios". 99.209.40.250 (talk) 15:49, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 13:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Undated films
I noticed that a sequel to Zootopia was added to the undated films section without a source. Can you remove it, please? 99.209.40.250 (talk) 14:15, 30 November 2022 (UTC)


 * ✅ ARandomName123 (talk) 18:17, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

WP:FANSITE
Please note that WP:FANSITEs should not be used as references. That means that sites such as TheDisinsider.com should be removed and replaced with better sources. -- 109.77.195.44 (talk) 21:47, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The entry for the upcoming film "Tom Sawyer" is using the WP:FANSITE theDisinsider.com as a reference. The reference should be removed or replaced. -- 109.79.167.143 (talk) 14:03, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Does The Return of Jafar belong on this list?
The Return of Jafar was recently added to this article by User:Masterof6cartoons. I suspect it does not fit the criteria "produced by and released under the Walt Disney Pictures banner" as specified in the lede of the article. My suspicion is based mostly on the fact that it has been added and removed many times in the past. Here are all the previous deletion records.


 * 2021 2017 2015 2011 2010 2010 2010 2009 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2007 2007

And there are a few other films recently added that might be similar to The Return of Jafar. (The above list of questionable additions updated 2023-03-03.)
 * Aladdin and the King of Thieves
 * An Extremely Goofy Movie
 * Buzz Lightyear of Star Command: The Adventure Begins
 * Mickey's Once Upon a Christmas
 * Mickey's House of Villains
 * The Lion King II: Simba's Pride
 * Pocahontas II: Journey to a New World
 * Beauty and the Beast: The Enchanted Christmas
 * Belle's Magical World
 * Atlantis: Milo's Return
 * Pooh's Grand Adventure: The Search for Christopher Robin
 * Hercules: Zero to Hero
 * Tarzan & Jane
 * Gargoyles the Movie: The Heroes Awaken
 * Mighty Ducks the Movie: The First Face-Off

Should all of these films be removed from the article? --Joseph Hewes (talk) 07:04, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
 * If they have the castle opening used for Walt Disney Pictures films, then they should probably remain on the list. Some of the recent 20th Century Studios productions that were released as Disney+ Originals featured the 2011 version, although the text for Walt Disney Pictures is never explicitly mentioned in the credits for those films. Despite this, they are still considered WDP releases even though the studio isn't mentioned because they do still feature the castle opening that is used for their productions, but also because they were promoted on the Walt Disney Studios accounts on social media, which specifically focuses on WDP releases. -- SlySabre (talk) 06:56, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Here's some research for The Return of Jafar. The opening & closing credits from the 1994 VHS release have been posted to YouTube.
 * The film started with a Walt Disney Home Video logo card and a "Walt Disney Home Video presents" title credit.
 * The closing credits said "Produced by Walt Disney Television Animation" and end with a 1994 Walt Disney Television logo card (which includes the Disneyland castle image).
 * And here's a 1994 Los Angeles Times article that says the film "was made for a song in Disney’s TV animation division".
 * Which of the above details are determining factors in whether or not The Return of Jafar (in particular) is in the scope of this article? Or is more information needed? The history of the various Disney companies and who owned what in 1994 is not clear to me. --Joseph Hewes (talk) 09:44, 30 December 2022 (UTC)


 * If it has visible text for "Walt Disney Pictures" on the castle logo, or if Walt Disney Pictures is listed in the credits, then it's a Walt Disney Pictures release. If Walt Disney Pictures isn't mentioned anywhere in the credits, and the castle logo instead has text showing "Walt Disney Home Video", then it is not, unless the physical packaging of the DVD/VHS or disk itself mentions Walt Disney Pictures, then it gets more complicated. SlySabre (talk) 18:23, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

International distribution
Is it necessary to note whether Buena Vista International or Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures International distributed the film? Both are subsidiaries of Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures which is the distributor for most of the films on the list, so noting which one of the two was the international distributor for the films seems unnecessary. Mediafan200 (talk) 02:43, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Can we list the movies by their Disney era?
Disney films are often categorized into eras.see pernille olum’s book “the art of pernille olum “ page 10 in a caption box for more details. 2603:8001:B000:220:9CE2:8CC8:648F:70C9 (talk) 03:51, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

A note to the editor
Dear sir, I would like to inform you that the films, Phineas and Ferb the Movie: Candace Against the Universe, Secret Society of Second-Born Royals, and Zombies 3, are not produced by Walt Disney Pictures. Signed, an anonymous user (I'm anonymous because I like it that way) :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.202.17.99 (talk) 00:43, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅ ~ Jedi94  ( Want to tell me something? ) 03:57, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Protected edit request
Should be noted that Treasure Island is the first fully live-action film on this list. All the others involving live action seem to be partially animated, as well. Easliest film listed with any live action appears to be Victory Through Air Power. 136.159.160.121 (talk) 17:09, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Indiana Jones?
I thought Indy5 was a Lucasfilm? This list is not including the Marvel or Star Wars films so why is Dial of Destiny included? Or does it break from the other LF releases and starts with the castle? 136.159.160.121 (talk) 17:13, 20 July 2023 (UTC)


 * It features the Disney 100 castle animation that is used in the opening for the studio's releases under the banner, and the bottom of the film's posters mention "Disney presents" alongside the logo. That is why it is considered unique among the other Lucasfilm and Marvel films as the other films don't feature this type of promotional branding and marketing, which is what sets this one apart as a Walt Disney Pictures release. SlySabre (talk) 17:51, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * So to answer your question further, yes, it is considered a Walt Disney Pictures release, but it is also co-branded as a Lucasfilm release since they too are credited. Hope this information helps. SlySabre (talk) 19:55, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Shouldn't include non-Walt Disney Films releases
Recently a number of movies were added which were not produced by Walt Disney Pictures/Walt Disney Productions/RKO Pictures so they should be removed (The Return of Jafar, Pocahontas II, etc.). Releases only produced by Walt Disney Television Animation would not qualify for inclusion here. 216.169.5.192 (talk) 15:54, 2 November 2023 (UTC)