Talk:List of World Heritage Sites in Croatia

Tentative list
I don't understand the tentative list section. The sites listed there aren't World Heritage Sites, so what are they? Cordless Larry (talk) 11:18, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, I get it now thanks to the UNESCO website. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:20, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Formatting
What is the issue with the formatting? I don't understand why someone is eager to revert small changes in column width. And there is no "standard" for table formatting; see the following links below where the tables look different:


 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_World_Heritage_Sites_in_Cyprus
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_World_Heritage_Sites_in_Italy
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_World_Heritage_Sites_in_Spain

So again I ask: what is so wrong with the changes made? --Jesuislafete (talk) 19:33, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
 * You did your best to find the lists that "do not" use the specific format, which is a small minority. I will eventually get to lists for Spain and Italy to unify the style. It is more compact than what you propose and more convenient for the reader, for example. --Tone 19:45, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, Spain has been promoted to a FL in 2010 and we should check if it still fits while Italy is not a FL. --Tone 19:51, 23 October 2021 (UTC)


 * That is assuming bad faith by User:Tone. I am surprised that you chose to accuse me rather than answering my question on the formatting. It appears to me that you are more interested in keeping your formatting than actually improving the page. You did not ever use the talk page to explain yourself. I was the one who started a discussion on the talk page.
 * Can you please link me a page that says that this formatting is required for World Heritage sites? --Jesuislafete (talk) 19:54, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
 * It is not formally required, however, these articles went through a detailed review and were considered good. The style is compact, readable, adjustable to a wide variety of screens. And since you picked European lists, you must have seen that almost all of them are using the same style. So, it is not assuming bad faith, just pointing out the obvious ;) --Tone 20:03, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Yet you were willing to edit war over table widths rather than using the talk page. Incredible. --Jesuislafete (talk) 16:34, 30 October 2021 (UTC)