Talk:List of World Heritage Sites in the United States

The Alamo
The Alamo and the San Antonio missions were named a World Heritage site on July 4, 2015. It should be added to the list in the article.--ML (talk) 16:07, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1466 ~ the meccaneer (talk) 18:44, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of World Heritage Sites in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170224235652/http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/409 to http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/409

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:34, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

The tentative list has been updated
...for the first time in NINE years. They added the Brooklyn Bridge and a bunch of Chicago skyscrapers.Arglebargle79 (talk) 01:24, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Frank Lloyd Wright
The 20th Century Architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright is no longer tentative and has been added to the WHL. Powers T 12:59, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Is a table the best format?
It seems to me that the Description column in the table causes the table to be difficult to read, even on a desktop monitor. There are two possible ways to fix this: One way would be to remove the Description column or limit the number of words in the description since each entry has a link to the appropriate article. The other way would be to convert from a table to a bulleted list so that the descriptions can use the full page width. Indyguy (talk) 17:27, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Should an article be created for California Current Conservation Complex tentative site?
Or would it be better to just add a section about the World Heritage Site tentative site to the California Current article? The article would ideally include all components of the tentative site including a number of protected and natural heritage areas administered by the NPS, the FWS, NOAA, etc. I'm curious about what everyone thinks. Cheers! Ligocsicnarf89 (talk) 21:35, 27 March 2023 (UTC)


 * I think that even if the Complex is designated as a WHS, it still shouldn't have a separate article, but California Current could be expanded or transformed to include it so as to not have duplication. The tentative site could definitely be mentioned there as part of a description of what areas off the coast have protection, but I don't see notability there for it yet. Reywas92Talk 23:04, 27 March 2023 (UTC)