Talk:List of World Heritage sites in Cambodia

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because its creator, User:Nann Chhay, has not been notified or given a chance to contest it. --Dicklyon (talk) 16:20, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

It looks to me like the content from from Wikipedia's article List of World Heritage Sites in Southeast Asia. For example, the table structure and the Angkor text that Randy edited was there from at least 2015. So maybe we just need to add a split attribution (and finish the split). Dicklyon (talk) 17:08, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (Will rewrite much of it after a look, thanks) --Randy Kryn (talk) 16:21, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Is deleting some of the language and rewording considered a rewrite of copyright material on Wikipedia? Copyrighted language should be almost totally reworded, so does deleting much of it and leaving a bare rewritten minimum work for Wikipedia standards? Randy Kryn (talk) 16:35, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If it came from another wikipedia article, as I note above that it probably does, then we don't need to do that. Dicklyon (talk) 17:09, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, the text used here was copied from the List of World Heritage Sites in Southeast Asia Wikipedia page. However, the language on that page is also a copyright violation of the UNESCO World Heritage Center website. The copyvio text appears to have begun being added (actually re-added) in 2015 after the article was cleaned of it in November 2014. You will find a notice posted at Talk:List of World Heritage Sites in Southeast Asia. I have revdel'd this article to remove the copyvio history. And placed a copyvio notice on the other article which will need to have all the summaries removed and/or rewritten from scratch. This is because those site summaries appear to be copied from the UNESCO website which holds all rights reserved. — Cactus Writer (talk) 17:55, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * – So do we have similar issues at lot of the other List of World Heritage Sites in XXX articles? Dicklyon (talk) 23:42, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * That's quite possible. I have not checked those other lists. — Cactus Writer (talk) 23:50, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/&order=country#alphaA and its subpages. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Cactus Writer (talk) 17:59, 12 January 2019 (UTC)