Talk:List of accolades received by 7 Khoon Maaf

Proposed merge
Why not merge this list to 7 Khoon Maaf? There are only 10 awards present, and 2 of them are questionable. Looking at the size of its parent article, this list looks quite forky to me. Yashthepunisher (talk) 06:07, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * You should place appropriate banners on both pages to transclude this merger discussion in various pages. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:30, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Done, sorry I forgot that. Yashthepunisher (talk) 08:57, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I was about to initiate a merge request long back when I saw the list. The film has just three wins from prominent ceremonies. &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 09:55, 22 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Support merger. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:02, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Support per my above comment. &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 15:54, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Oppose merger. Movie is clear critical acclaimed winner deserve a accolades page. 213.205.251.96 (talk) 21:22, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Not clear why it deserves a separate page. Please elaborate. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 02:49, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Movie being critically acclaimed or not has got nothing to with WP:CFORK. &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 09:23, 23 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Strong Oppose: First the main article is large and willbe expanded at least 2x in the near future. I t would become extremely large. So i guess its fine to have a separate page. Plus, I dont know if there is a rule or something,the article has a DYK. You see it or not? And, look at this film's list. Krish  |  Talk  06:26, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Enthiran's list is a FL, and has won a total of 22 awards from 35 nom's. Unlike this one with 9 wins from 29 nom's, within two dubious ceremonies. I don't think DYK has got anything to do with this list, its a matter of content fork. We can't wait for you to expand it "2x" and make it "extremely large". Sorry, but I see a 3(b) violation here. If you have mentioned Enthiran, compare its size with of 7 Khoon Maaf. This proposition will continue until you bring the parent article to the aforementioned size. Yashthepunisher (talk) 07:16, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Tomorrow. By the way, I wrote the film's article when I was very new on wikipedia. At time I didn't know much about what should be added. So I wrote a brief article. That's why 7 Khoon Maaf and Barfi's article are so short. But I will expand both of them. 7 Khoon Maaf would appear on its 7th Anniversery and Barfi! on 10th. Krish |  Talk  07:45, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The fact that the article has appeared in DYK is irrelevant here. Many articles (DYKs) have been deleted (through AFDs). More recently, even a Featured Article was deleted through AFD. &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 09:23, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * FA deleted?! Which? That's interesting... §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 12:41, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Not deleted, but closed as 'No consensus'. &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 04:59, 24 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Strong support A pretty blatant example of WP:CFORK violation. — Indian: BIO  [ ChitChat  ] 19:14, 23 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Strong Oppose Cleary passes these policies - WP:SIGCOV & WP:NOTPAPER. This is a well written article and has scope for expansion for a critically spoken Indian Movie. 213.205.251.253 (talk) 09:10, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * SIGCOV says "Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail... (emphasis added). The topic here has to be awards received by this film. Can you please show us such significant coverage of the topic? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 16:58, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Well could you please point if page isn't covering any detail ? 213.205.251.184 (talk) 17:33, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Never mind if you did not understand the guideline. We will talk when you sign up and login. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:24, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure how WP:SIGCOV and WP:NOTPAPER are relevant in this case. A critically acclaimed movie may not necessarily get more awards. The point is not about the size of the parent article, but that of this list. &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 08:09, 26 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Merger discussions usually tend to be very sloppy and we have tons of unclosed discussions. Am "happy" to see two like minded IP from non-Indian neighbourhoods suddenly participating in Wikipedia's growth sharing concerns about Indian movies. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 17:12, 24 January 2016 (UTC)