Talk:List of accolades received by Brokeback Mountain

Format
I think all this info will be more neater in table form or similar... --Charlie Huang 【正矗昊】 12:21, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism
The practice of vandalism in Wikipedia articles is not limited to inserting jokes, but also includes deletion of whole sections of information, without some prior warning, discussion, and concensus. Such deletion of sections of information is called "blanking" and is very frequent, perhaps because it is much easier to delete a section (or revert to a prior version), rather than to add new detailed information.

In this article, the new section "See also" has been blanked multiple times, under the guise of nonconformance to the strictest of Wikipedia format standards; however, such blanking is still pure vandalism, even if disguised by elaborate excuses. The correct approach is to establish a warning notice for other editors, open a dialogue, and try to reach a concensus before deleting whole sections from an article, especially if those sections are new, which further amplifies the extreme level of the vandalism. -Wikid77 17:35, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

31-May-2006: I have been trying to get improvements into this article for the past 24 hours, but on 3 separate occasions, user Melchoir has refused to allow a top-note line above the article in the form of a standard hatnote: "This article is about USE1, for USE2, see PAGE2" (allowed by Wikipedia guidelines). At this point, I have abandoned adding the hatnote: I cannot afford to waste any more time by user Melchoir vandalizing the article to remove added information (in legitimate format). Yes, it has been 24 hours fighting to get a simple hatnote & "See-also" section added to this article, to match the format of the other articles about Brokeback Mountain. No wonder the information about that film has been so hollow on Wikipedia: people are actively fighting to vandalize sections and kill added information. -Wikid77 02:28, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

This whole article is cobblers; it's just a list of facts that are already listed in other articles about the movie on wp, some wholesale lifting of quotations, and a bit of unsubstantiated opinionating. I feel it should be deleted, or massively edited/rewritten. SpaceyHopper 10:28, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

This should be incorporated into the main Brokeback Mountain article
That page already has a section devoted to the movie's critical reception, and a section for awards and nominations. Why the separate page? Nizamarain 15:23, 16 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Agree - shouldn't this article be "List of Brokeback Mountain awards"? Because that's how it reads. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 16:42, 17 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The current Brockeback Mountain article seems to cover most of this, I don't think this comprehensive list and separate page are necessary. Bro2baseball (talk) 22:10, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of awards and nominations received by Almost Famous which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 17:46, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of accolades received by Almost Famous which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 01:01, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of accolades received by Brokeback Mountain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://theenvelope.latimes.com/awards/oscars/env-turan5mar05%2C0%2C5359042.story
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101112231205/http://www.theasc.com/asc_news/awards/awards_history.php to http://www.theasc.com/asc_news/awards/awards_history.php
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150512181500/http://www.wga.org/wga-awards/previous-nominees-winners.aspx to http://www.wga.org/wga-awards/previous-nominees-winners.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:21, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of accolades received by Brokeback Mountain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150416122310/http://www.chicagofilmcritics.org/1998-2006 to http://www.chicagofilmcritics.org/1998-2006
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140413201050/http://dublinfilmcriticscircle.weebly.com/2006.html to http://dublinfilmcriticscircle.weebly.com/2006.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140314002444/http://filmmakermagazine.com/2046-gotham-awards-nominations-announced/ to http://filmmakermagazine.com/2046-gotham-awards-nominations-announced/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:02, 19 May 2017 (UTC)