Talk:List of aircraft engine manufacturers

Pre-2007 talk
Bold textBold textwhy do we have 'Aircraft Engine Manufacturers' and 'Aircraft engine manufacturers' - two apparently different lists!

Linuxlad 12:54, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Could you provide links to all the ones that you've found? Estel 12:56, Nov 26, 2004 (UTC)

Which? Lists, or manufacturers :-)
 * The first is self evident -
 * the second is something of a chore - because of the way firms have merged and split some are not wholly obvious. How many different version of RR have there been (RR, RR plc, RR (1971)) and similarly Bristol-Siddeley and its precursors are also traceable back under various names.

That said, there is little point in keeping two lists, with subtly different spellings!

Power Jets (the original Whittle 'startup')? Linuxlad 15:30, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC) User:Gunter Yes, that's right!

User:Gunter Are we including (car) engines that were used in planes? Or just Engines specifically made for planes? If the later, do one off modifications of car engines by the manufacturer count?


 * Gunter, you've added a lot of names, but be careful about wikilinking them without chacking where that wikilink will go. Many go to articles which are about something different. I've listed this page on Cleanup for this reason. In answer to your question, I'd say the list should only include companies who mass-produced aircraft engines.dramatic 18:23, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Can we have fuel burn per hour for all the listed engines?


 * I agree, we should only list manufacturers of aircraft engines produced as such. Askari Mark | Talk 17:38, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Added Lyul'ka as important manufacter —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.222.17.204 (talk) 20:03, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Dashes
Need to fix the mixture of dashes long and short (to short) 'en' and 'em'?! Don't ask me! Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by)    23:21, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:CFMI Logo.jpg
The image File:CFMI Logo.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --00:59, 11 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Dear Bot: you are quite right, it doesn't meet fair use provisions of US copyright law, so I have removed it. - Ahunt (talk) 01:50, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Why isn't this just a category?
This list doesn't contain a table with any additional data for the manufacturers. Seems like this should just be a category page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Metalliqaz (talk • contribs) 01:56, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Good question. - Ahunt (talk) 12:07, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I guess it has the advantage over the existing category that they are all here where the categories are split into 25 countries and I think further split into active and defunct. This page is a bit dull, it could do with some text and images but what to choose without upsetting somebody?! Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by)  14:44, 17 October 2019 (UTC)