Talk:List of amateur radio frequency bands in India

Comparative rarity of Indian hams
Is the figure 16,000 correct? Seems rather low for India with a population of 1.2 billion. --Wtshymanski (talk) 03:57, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Main Page appearance
Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of the article List of amateur radio frequency bands in India know that it will be appearing as the main page featured list on March 25, 2013. You can view the TFL blurb at Today's featured list/March 25, 2013. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured list directors, or , or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured list. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. Thanks! Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  04:13, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

 

Amateur radio frequency bands in India are used by over 16,000 licenced users of amateur radio. Five categories of licences are granted by the Wireless and Planning and Coordination Wing (WPC), a branch of the Ministry of Communications and Information Technology. In addition, the WPC allocates frequency spectrum in India. To obtain a licence in the first four categories, candidates must pass the Amateur Station Operator's Certificate examination conducted by the WPC. This exam is held monthly in Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata and Chennai, every two months in Ahmedabad, Nagpur and Hyderabad, and every four months in some smaller cities. After passing the examination, the candidate must clear a police interview. Each licence category has certain privileges allotted to it, including the allotment of frequencies, output power, and the emission modes.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on List of amateur radio frequency bands in India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081010160640/http://www.arsi.info/images/wpc78full.pdf to http://www.arsi.info/images/wpc78full.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081010160640/http://www.arsi.info/images/wpc78full.pdf to http://www.arsi.info/images/wpc78full.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081010160640/http://www.arsi.info/images/wpc78full.pdf to http://www.arsi.info/images/wpc78full.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081010160640/http://www.arsi.info/images/wpc78full.pdf to http://www.arsi.info/images/wpc78full.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081010160640/http://www.arsi.info/images/wpc78full.pdf to http://www.arsi.info/images/wpc78full.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081010160640/http://www.arsi.info/images/wpc78full.pdf to http://www.arsi.info/images/wpc78full.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:22, 18 November 2017 (UTC)