Talk:List of ambassadors of the Republic of China to the Holy See

Requested move 10 June 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Page moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jerm (talk) 03:37, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

List of ambassadors of the China to the Holy See → List of ambassadors of the Republic of China to the Holy See – "...of the China" in the title doesn't make much sense. However, there is a potential discussion between renaming to "List of ambassadors of the Republic of China to the Holy See" vs. "List of ambassadors of China to the Holy See". I selected the former as that is convention among other lists of ambassador shown in Lists of heads of diplomatic missions of the Republic of China. Twoggo (talk) 03:13, 10 June 2021 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Speedy close and move to WP:RMTM - this is an obvious typo from User:Ericliu1912 's recent move. Just revert it.  On the merits, assuming Ericliu meant to just revert to "ambassadors of China", disagree with that move as well - "Republic of China" is needed for clarity.  SnowFire (talk) 14:47, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I accidentally forgot to remove the “the” when moving the article, and it can’t be moved back, my fault. Though I thought it would be better to be aligned with other lists about ambassadors from (whatever) China, and I would like to point out there had been no ambassador to the Holy See from the People’s Republic of China yet (so no need to “clarify” which China it is, and I think the article itself said enough), if really needed, adding “Republic of” would still be fine. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 15:55, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Support as proposed. "Republic of" is definitely needed. Lennart97 (talk) 13:26, 16 June 2021 (UTC)