Talk:List of amusement park rankings

Refocus article
I propose to refocus this article much like List of roller coaster rankings so that it could include information wider than just attendance. The new title would be List of amusement park rankings and it would feature: Thoughts? Themeparkgc  Talk  02:32, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
 * the amusement park rankings section from the other article
 * park-related Golden Ticket Awards such as Best Park, Best Water Park etc


 * I support this idea.--Astros4477 (talk) 02:38, 9 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I have moved the content from the other article here and moved this article. I will add some Golden Ticket Awards later. Themeparkgc   Talk  23:45, 11 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Do you think we should remove the 2008 column to keep it just the recent three years? It'll just keep getting longer but I could see keeping them if it helps the article..--Astros4477 (talk) 00:08, 12 November 2012 (UTC)


 * That's probably a good idea. Before you do that though, could we merge some of the statistics into the main articles about the parks? E.g. for Magic Kingdom you would have something like:
 * {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center"

!2008||2009||2010||2011||Worldwide rank
 * 17,063,000 || 17,233,000 || 16,972,000 || 17,142,000 || 1
 * }
 * Alternatively, you could have it on company pages. E.g. for Walt Disney Parks & Resorts:
 * {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:right"
 * {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:right"

!Park||2008||2009||2010||2011||Worldwide rank ! style="text-align:left" | Walt Disney Parks & Resorts || 118,000,000 || 119,100,000 || 120,600,000 || 121,400,000 || 1
 * style="text-align:left" | Magic Kingdom || 17,063,000 || 17,233,000 || 16,972,000 || 17,142,000 || 1
 * style="text-align:left" | Disneyland || 14,721,000 || 15,900,000 || 15,980,000 || 16,140,000 || 2
 * style="text-align:left" | Tokyo Disneyland || 14,293,000 || 13,646,000 || 14,452,000 || 13,996,000 || 3
 * style="text-align:left" | Tokyo DisneySea || 12,498,000 || 12,004,000 || 12,663,000 || 11,930,000 || 4
 * style="text-align:left" | Disneyland Park (Paris) || 12,688,000 || 12,740,000 || 10,500,000 || 10,990,000 || 5
 * style="text-align:left" | Epcot || 10,935,000 || 10,990,000 || 10,825,000 || 10,825,000 || 6
 * style="text-align:left" | Disney's Animal Kingdom || 9,540,000 || 9,590,000 || 9,686,000 || 9,783,000 || 7
 * style="text-align:left" | Disney's Hollywood Studios || 9,608,000 || 9,700,000 || 9,603,000 || 9,699,000 || 8
 * style="text-align:center" colspan="6" | etc
 * -style="text-align:right"
 * style="text-align:left" | Epcot || 10,935,000 || 10,990,000 || 10,825,000 || 10,825,000 || 6
 * style="text-align:left" | Disney's Animal Kingdom || 9,540,000 || 9,590,000 || 9,686,000 || 9,783,000 || 7
 * style="text-align:left" | Disney's Hollywood Studios || 9,608,000 || 9,700,000 || 9,603,000 || 9,699,000 || 8
 * style="text-align:center" colspan="6" | etc
 * -style="text-align:right"
 * style="text-align:left" | Disney's Hollywood Studios || 9,608,000 || 9,700,000 || 9,603,000 || 9,699,000 || 8
 * style="text-align:center" colspan="6" | etc
 * -style="text-align:right"
 * -style="text-align:right"
 * }
 * Thoughts? Themeparkgc   Talk  01:20, 12 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Ya that's a good idea. I've been wanting to add something similar to that to the Cedar Point article for some time but I've never gotten around to it.--Astros4477 (talk) 01:43, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

I think we should only have the top 10 parks for each table to keep it consistent. What do you think?-- Astros4477 ( talk ) 22:38, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

I'm going to start adding the attendance charts to the articles. This may take a while and I'm going to do it in groups. It's a busy week with Thanksgiving and stuff so I'll try to get as much done when I can.-- Astros4477 ( talk ) 02:58, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Lacking 2007 data
Here is the 2007 data : http://www.teaconnect.org/sites/default/files/misc/files/2007erareport.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Loup Solitaire 81 (talk • contribs) 13:21, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on List of amusement park rankings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151018203544/http://www.aecom.com/deployedfiles/Internet/Capabilities/Economics/_documents/Theme%20Index%202011.pdf to http://www.aecom.com/deployedfiles/Internet/Capabilities/Economics/_documents/Theme%20Index%202011.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140408022049/http://www.aecom.com/deployedfiles/Internet/Capabilities/Economics/_documents/2012%20Theme%20Index%20Combined_1-1_online.pdf to http://www.aecom.com/deployedfiles/Internet/Capabilities/Economics/_documents/2012%20Theme%20Index%20Combined_1-1_online.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140606220440/http://www.teaconnect.org/pdf/TEAAECOM2013.pdf to http://www.teaconnect.org/pdf/TEAAECOM2013.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130513014843/http://waterparks.org/otherArticles/TEAERAattendance_report2006.pdf to http://waterparks.org/otherArticles/TEAERAattendance_report2006.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:41, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Water Parks
Why are the Bahamas listed as being part of Latin America instead of North America? And why is the Middle East lumped together with Europe instead of Asia? 2601:346:C201:60C0:2C79:74D8:6C5A:AEF4 (talk) 17:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Table rankings
The table rankings for the list of parks with most coasters appears to have been vandalised to a ridiculous degree. It's making my eyes hurt, so can someone with better table editing knowledge than me please fix it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AidenTEM (talk • contribs) 22:46, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * "Universal Studios Hollywood should no longer appear in the Top 25 Worldwide; on the North America table, Hersheypark, Kings Island, and SeaWorld Orlando all have higher attendance figures 2601:346:C201:60C0:E092:461F:9C22:ED7B (talk) 20:43, 26 October 2021 (UTC) Walt Disney Studios Paris should no longer appear in the Top 25 Worldwide; on the Europe table, Tivoli Gardens has a higher attendance figures 2601:346:C201:60C0:E092:461F:9C22:ED7B (talk) 20:47, 26 October 2021 (UTC)  Nagashima Spa Land, Ocean Park Hong Kong, Hong Kong Disneyland, and Lotte World should no longer appear in the Top 25 Worldwide; on the Asia table, Fantawild Adventure Zhengzhou, Happy Valley Shenzen, Happy Valley Shanghai, and Happy Valley Chengdu all have higher attendance figures 2601:346:C201:60C0:E092:461F:9C22:ED7B (talk) 21:03, 26 October 2021 (UTC)" 2601:346:C201:60C0:F51C:AB6F:860C:6C14 (talk) 01:32, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

2020 Updates
Universal Studios Hollywood should no longer appear in the Top 25 Worldwide; on the North America table, Hersheypark, Kings Island, and SeaWorld Orlando all have higher attendance figures 2601:346:C201:60C0:E092:461F:9C22:ED7B (talk) 20:43, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Walt Disney Studios Paris should no longer appear in the Top 25 Worldwide; on the Europe table, Tivoli Gardens has a higher attendance figures 2601:346:C201:60C0:E092:461F:9C22:ED7B (talk) 20:47, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Nagashima Spa Land, Ocean Park Hong Kong, Hong Kong Disneyland, and Lotte World should no longer appear in the Top 25 Worldwide; on the Asia table, Fantawild Adventure Zhengzhou, Happy Valley Shenzen, Happy Valley Shanghai, and Happy Valley Chengdu all have higher attendance figures 2601:346:C201:60C0:E092:461F:9C22:ED7B (talk) 21:03, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

2021 updates?
It's now 2022 -- why is there still no data representing 2020? Even if it was a slow year, the info still exists somewhere. How do you flag an article for more attention? 2601:346:C201:60C0:B46C:7F6B:4679:41A9 (talk) 00:22, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Pretty low quality article
Pretty low quality article Saad Mirza (talk) 09:24, 30 December 2023 (UTC)


 * That's a pretty pointless comment. -- Zanimum (talk) 13:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC)