Talk:List of animals that are extinct in the wild

Cleanup
A few comments on how this page could be cleaned up: 109.155.172.75 (talk) 17:41, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't see why we need two pages, one for animals and another for plants, given that there are only 75 species in all - 75 is not a big number, and could easily fit on a single page.
 * Delinking the headings would make the page easier to read - the species names themselves would stand out more.
 * What is the reason for "Binomial and trinomial nomenclature should be used, no more"? I would find it helpful to have the common names of these species as well - provided the IUCN list of binominal names is used as the basis for the page, the ambiguous nature of common names would not be a problem.

Requested move 9 August 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: moved (closed by non-admin page mover) D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 20:09, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

List of extinct in the wild animals → List of animals that are extinct in the wild – Proper grammar. Blubabluba9990 (talk) (contribs) 18:37, 9 August 2021 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Support: Easier to parse. —&#8288;&#8202;&#8288;BarrelProof (talk) 21:52, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. Station1 (talk) 03:17, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment this can simply be 'List of animals extinct in the wild'—blindlynx (talk) 05:03, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I think it's much easier to understand the way it was proposed. —&#8288;&#8202;&#8288;BarrelProof (talk) 15:49, 10 August 2021 (UTC)