Talk:List of archbishops of Uppsala

Untitled
Hello Uppland. I think you have this on your watchlist?

You wrote: Adding info directly to the list would be more suitable if all that was known was that "John Doe is mentioned as archbishop of Uppsala in papal document so-and-so from year X, but is otherwise unattested"

Yes, you are right. But for once, I slightly disagree with you. When there is only a few paragraphs on a person, I want them to be on a common page to enhance readability. The biggest problem is that these persons are so uninteresting to almost anyone that they don't deserve a separate page.

Do you agree with me? --Fred chessplayer 15:06, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * I am undecided about some of the shorter biographies, but a couple of the longer ones could probably become articles of their own. I am not going to do anything about it now; we can see how things develop. I did some formatting with  -tags to get the text to align with the indent after the bullets. / Uppland 15:45, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * Ok. Notice that all biographies have their own pages but may have been unlinked.
 * The ideal is that every archbishop has a shorter intro. In that way we can give a coherent "history of Archbishops" to the pages that are by themselves not interesting to most people. --Fred chessplayer 17:33, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Issue two: I think it looks better without the tags because then the paragraphs are easier to distinguish from the name. Is there a guideline for this? --Fred chessplayer 10:46, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)