Talk:List of content management systems/Archive 4



Jahia
This page shoudl include Jahia in the Java Free and Open source section

Runs on mysql, oracle, hssql, mssql, postgresql Latest version 6 Licence GPL & Commercial —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.246.62.76 (talk • contribs)


 * We should wait and see how the AfD goes first. Haakon (talk) 17:25, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

MediaWiki
I am surprise not to find MediaWiki in this list Ahem85 (talk) 06:57, 23 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Agree. I have no tech knowledge to put it in, but find very strange no one did insert it. I am even more surprised after seeing that the article about MediaWiki itself describes it as a content management system. 151.21.39.68 (talk) 14:48, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

I second this. I'd like to have mediawiki included in this list! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Narasimhanator (talk • contribs) 19:48, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Mistake to be fixed
Free software is not the antonym of commercial software but of proprietary software. Ditto open source. This is a common mistake. Please fix it ASAP. 85.77.191.92 (talk) 08:57, 5 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Good catch, fixed. Haakon (talk) 09:11, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Suggests: consolidate lists; compare features and details, not just details
Why are there a bunch of lists here. It's difficult to compare CMS the way this article is structured because they are separate lists. I would suggest the sections in this article become a column on a single unified table. If the user wants to see them organized in this way, the user can sort them this way, but is not forced to view them organized in this way.

Also, this comparison is less helpful because it really doesn't compare anything. There's no feature lists to compare. The lists here are really comparing details about each software that most users may not care about, or are less important. I came to this article because I was looking too see what CMS support integration with MediaWiki, have integrated wiki software, and various other features I find important. While the license the CMS is released under and the base language the software was written in are factors in my decision making process, ultimately, the way this article is structured is not at all helpful for the information I was looking for. Servel333 (talk) 20:12, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I strongly agree, it just needs somebody with the energy to untangle the current structure and re-order it. Greenman (talk) 20:43, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * This article used to be called Comparisons of content management systems, but the title was changed for the very concerns you bring up. It is not intended to be shopping guide for or comprehensive comparison of CMS software, but a relatively simple list of Wikipedia articles on the topic. — Satori Son 13:22, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

suggest a cms
Under ASP.NET open source, there should be another CMS called Kooboo CMS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zguoqi (talk • contribs) 10:59, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Since that article was deleted five minutes before you made this comment (see Articles for deletion/Kooboo), it is not eligible to be included in this list of notable CMS. — Satori Son 12:57, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Under ASP.NET Sitecore CMS should be listed. It was removed for some reason with a notation that Sitecore is a company and not a CMS. Sitecore is a company but their CMS is called "Sitecore CMS". http://www.sitecore.net/en/Products/Sitecore-CMS.aspx It seems like competitors are possibly deleting each other's platforms? 17:12, 18 May 2010 (UTC)labarista —Preceding unsigned comment added by Labarista (talk • contribs)

MediaCore Video CMS
I would like to suggest the python open source CMS, MediaCore to be included to this page. The list of Python CMS's seems pretty short and it would be great to have another one in there.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Simplestation (talk • contribs) 08:08, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Name: MediaCore Video CMS
 * Language: Python
 * Supported databases: mySQL
 * Latest stable: 0.7.2
 * Date: 1 FEB 2010
 * License: GPLv3
 * Url: http://getmediacore.com
 * There is not yet a Wikipedia article for MediaCore. If you think it is sufficiently notable, you can create an article for it, but be sure you provide citations to significant coverage by reliable sources. If you don't feel comfortable writing the article yourself, you can make a request at Requested articles. — Satori Son 13:01, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

- "don't add entries that don't have articles on wikipedia" -- how dumb is that ?? why should every CMS have a WP article ? this is a CMS - LIST -- and it's VERY incomplete for the Python Language. - — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.255.251.165 (talk) 19:16, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia isn't meant to provide exhaustive and WP:INDISCRIMINATE coverage of all human endeavour, and has guidelines on the WP:Notability of various subjects for inclusion. You and I could write a Python CMS tomorrow, and it might even be a good one, but if it's not notable, then listing it here will just make it difficult to find info on the notable stuff. If there is a really notable CMS with lots of coverage from WP:Secondary, WP:Reliable sources, but an article hasn't been written about it yet, then please go ahead and add a WP:Red link for it, along with the references that show its notability. Someone will then see the red link, and be prompted to write an article about it. Thanks, Captain Conundrum (talk) 19:27, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Missing something
I may be missing something here but this list seems to be missing some of the most widely deployed CMS systems on the market. Documentum, Filenet, Opentext/Vignette. These are all major players in the CMS field but I don't see them in this list. Other commersial systems are listed so why are these ommitted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eurospoofer (talk • contribs) 12:46, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 * If there are Wikipedia articles for any of those, please do add them to this list article. Otherwise, WP:Write the Article First applies here and they should not be included. — Satori Son 13:07, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Add phpWebLog to the list
phpWebLog was one of the first CMS weblog systems written in PHP. The last release was 0.5.3 dated 2001-10-31. phpWebLog is no longer supported, but was widely adopted in its day and was the basis for several PHP-based blog/CMS forks. Perhaps this should be included simply for historical reference? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oweff (talk • contribs) 20:36, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from Jsalwen, 18 May 2010
Please add the following two entries under the ASP.NET CMS table, because they are both widely used and well documented. Sitecore    ASP.NET     SQL Server 2008, SQL Express 2008, Oracle, MySql 	6.2 Umbraco     ASP.NET     MySQL, SQL Server and VistaDB

Jsalwen (talk) 22:42, 18 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Requests to edit semi-protected articles must be accompanied by reference(s) to reliable sources.
 * I suggest you get an account, then you can help us improve articles.  Chzz  ►  02:20, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Categorisation
I'm confused as to why this article is categorised by platform as it's a fairly minor consideration, all told.

If a more appropriate differentiator can't be found, all items should end up in a single table. The table(s) should list features as well as technical information. Does it have blogs, wiki, comments, rss, workflow, multiple users, plugins, skinning, etc.

Currently all the mature CMS software is lost amongst the masses of startups, and this page provides little to no benefit to anybody. Phwoar (talk) 04:05, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

can you my CMS ?

I also think the implementation language classification is not a good primary index of the great variety of CMS's. There are different purposes, different storage ideas, different end uses, and more. One idea is to have multiple pages to allow different classifications to organize the tables. A simple idea is to allow sort by each column. An easy 1st step. Other more subjective organizing criteria might justify separate pages. Johnswolter (talk) 20:16, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Day Communique 5.3
Can someone bump the current stable version to 5.3?

Also: version 5.3. uses a JSR-283 compliant repository, not JSR-170 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelmarth (talk • contribs) 14:43, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Add OFBiz to the list
* http://ofbiz.apache.org/ It has a CMS plus other things, but it's still a CMS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.47.177.53 (talk) 20:59, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

CMS++
Based on Java, Struts, Ajax, DWR, jQuery. Very easy to use. Very rich functions. Multiling, workflow, structured pages based on a flexible XML structure, function drag & drop and more .. http://www.mediaplusplus.com/

Can you add CMS++ ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abenjell (talk • contribs) 01:24, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Alfresco information is wrong / out of date.
editsemiprotected

Informix is NOT a supported database [1], while Ingres is [2]. The latest release is 3.3, not 3.2 [3]. As of v3.3 Alfresco Community is released under LGPL [4].

[1] http://www.alfresco.com/services/subscription/supported-platforms/3-x/ [2] http://www.ingres.com/partners/alfresco/ [3] http://www.alfresco.com/products/editions/enterprise/3-3/ [4] http://newton.typepad.com/content/2010/01/a-shift-in-alfresco-community-license-to-lgpl.html

Pmonks (talk) 12:37, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done -- &#47; DeltaQuad &#124; Notify Me  &#92; 14:33, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Please add web2py to python section
It is already here. Databases: Firebird, IBM DB2, Informix, Ingres, Microsoft SQL Server, MySQL, Oracle, PostgreSQL, and Google App Engine (copied from that article)

i am a User at german wiki.

edit: i see... it is under web application frameworks. So lets change the first paragraph from ...

This is a list of notable content management systems that are used to organize and facilitate collaborative content creation. Many of them are built on top of separate content management frameworks.

... to ...

This is a list of notable content management systems that are used to organize and facilitate collaborative content creation. Many of them are built on top of separate content management frameworks or web application frameworks

Nils —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.226.0.1 (talk) 09:21, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from 76.89.70.163, 17 June 2010
The new WordPress CMS version 3.0 was just released, so the entry:

WordPress 	PHP 	MySQL 	2.9.2 	GPL 	2010-02-15

should now read:

WordPress 	PHP 	MySQL 	3.0 	GPL 	2010-06-17

-- Nile

76.89.70.163 (talk) 20:28, 17 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done Tim Pierce (talk) 01:51, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Drupal Version update
Drupal Stable Version 6.17 released on June 2nd 2010 Tomhung (talk) 21:12, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from Frankvanzanten, 1 July 2010
I'd want to add O3Spaces Workplace to the Software as a Service section:

Frankvanzanten (talk) 07:45, 1 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 11:32, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from 68.44.186.145, 10 July 2010
editsemiprotected

Please update current version of Drupal on this page to 6.17, released on 2010-06-02.

See: http://drupal.org/ and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drupal

Thanks.

68.44.186.145 (talk) 22:03, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅. Thanks. Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 22:14, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

GCMS main article missing
Under PHP, what is GCMS?

After doing a history search, I found out that it was a direct reference (no Wikipedia article) that I believe was put in by the developer on Oct 3, 2008. The link from that time is also dead. The user who added it hasn't made any other edits on any other date. Since there is no Wikipedia article, I have removed this reference. There may still be another GCMS, but this entry doesn't have any relation to it. Bye-bye GCMS. GuiderBob (talk) 19:00, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from Venexnet, 18 July 2010

 * GT PWOS 1
 * PHP5
 * MySQL
 * 1
 * unknown
 * 2009-08-10
 * 2009-08-10

Venexnet (talk) 15:32, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done -- Nx  / talk  20:51, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from 151.59.87.141, 18 July 2010

 * GT PWOS 1
 * PHP5
 * MySQL
 * 1
 * unknown
 * 2010-02

151.59.87.141 (talk) 16:26, 18 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done -- Nx  / talk  20:51, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

liveSite
Could you please add liveSite by Camelback Web Architects to this great list of CMS systems? http://www.camelback.net/

Thank you, Camelbackwebarchitects (talk) 20:55, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

please add feindura flat file cms
Hi,

i'm the author of feindura - Flat File CMS (see feindura.org)

can you please add feindura to the list of PHP flat file cms? like this:

feindura PHP 	Flat-file database 	1.0rc 	GPL 	2010-07-25

thanks a lot! fabian —Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.25.216.98 (talk) 15:57, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Radiant CMS updated - version: Refraction 0.9.1 released: (June 27, 2010)


 * Yellow check.svg Partly done: Radiant CMS was updated per the request. However, this page is for notable CMSs only. As a general guide for notability for this page, they should have their own article first. Stickee (talk)  22:13, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

hm i cannot find it under the open source flat file cms...??

fabian —Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.25.216.98 (talk) 11:54, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * See note above. Thanks, Stickee (talk)  22:15, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

ok means someone else have first to write an article about it? because if i write an article about it i think it would be considered as self proclamation :-) so i come back here if someone wrote something about it..!?

thanks anyway —Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.25.216.98 (talk) 17:14, 7 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Hey Fabian. You are welcome to create an article about Feindura, however, just make sure there is no conflict of interest and it is written from a neutral point of view. Though, I am more concerned about the notability of Feindura. For a CMS to be notable it should usually have been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself. (eg newspaper, online magazine article). I was unable to find any information about Feindura other than its website itself. Thanks, Stickee (talk)  01:16, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from TheMasquerade, 4 August 2010
Please can you include in the SaaS section:

Name: Website Breakout

Platform: ASP.NET

Licensed Version available: Yes

Last Stable Version = 1.0

URL: http://www.websitebreakout.com

and in the Proprietary software section:

Name: Breakout Management (CMS)

Platform: ASP.NET

Supported Database: MS Access (optional SQL Server)

Latest stable release: 1.0

Licenses: Proprietary software

Latest release date: 07/01/2010

URL: http://www.websitebreakout.com

TheMasquerade (talk) 16:46, 4 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done for now: As per the Wikipedia policy on lists, entries can only be listed if they have their own article first. Thanks, Stickee (talk)  22:19, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from Meryllmoreau, 5 August 2010
Hi there I would like to add Jahia open source solutions to the java CMS list
 * Jahia
 * Java
 * Postgres, MySQL, Oracle, SQL Server, DB2
 * 6.1
 * GNU- GPL v2
 * 6.1
 * GNU- GPL v2

More informations are available on the corporate website and community website: www.jahia.com www.jahia.org

Thanks for your work, wikipedia is a very good day to day tool

Meryllmoreau (talk) 08:42, 5 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: As per the Wikipedia policy on lists, entries can only be listed if they have their own article first. Thanks, Stickee (talk)  22:21, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

CMS G3
CMS G3 is a CMS which is used broadly in Europe, especially Switzerland. Its productizing is now heavily in development after 10 years of continuous development. Information will be updated in the web (wiki, website etc.) going forward. -- Aniello.bove (talk) 21:01, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 * See Articles for deletion/CMS G3. — Satori Son 15:16, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Copyleft
Are there really no CMSs that are under a copyleft license? 138.246.51.239 (talk) 18:25, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Webiva
I would suggest including Webiva in your list of CMS's as they are both open source and ruby-on-rails —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.119.81.135 (talk) 20:27, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

WebParser
I would suggest adding WebParser software. This tool allows to determine what CMS a website is using. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.72.48.12 (talk) 00:38, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Please add CMS ASP NET
CMS ASP NET (www.cmsaspnet.com) is a free GPL open source CMS for ASP.NET Framework 4.0 - does not use the database, with forums and gallery integrated, with social functions, wiki functions. Native multi-language, multi server, multi domains (one installation permit the managment of multiple web domains) last version 2.0 dated 13/06/2011  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.237.189.149 (talk) 12:59, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Please add CLOUD CMS section
www.juicecloud.co.uk http://www.cloudinclude.com www.inzu.net Osmek
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: As per the Wikipedia policy on lists, entries can only be listed if they have their own article first. Jesus Presley (talk) 10:56, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

SyndeoCMS, Site@School
http://www.syndeocms.org/ http://siteatschool.org/ http://websiteatschool.eu/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.123.29.4 (talk) 10:01, 27 August 2011 (UTC)


 * All of these have no own articles in WP, therefore: No, sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jesus Presley (talk • contribs) 10:54, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Please add Z-Admin Small Business CMS for ASP.NET
With z-admin Small Business CMS you will get all the tools needed to create beautiful website. Manage Pages, Columns, Articles and News.Get response from Users by adding Polls and Comment Boxes anywhere on your site. Add external content from RSS feeds, XML or REST Web Service. With support from Themes, easily change your web site look. Need specific business logic functionality? No problem, z-admin CMS support modules and custom SQL bound items. Easy to use and free!

Easy to use You don't need any tutorials for this application. If you know how to use Microsoft Word or similar Word processing application, you will know how to write Articles and News, and create Pages. Let's keep things simple!

Module based Depending on selected theme, you can add modules and custom modules to dedicated areas on web site. You can add module inside Article. You can easily change any part of web site; don't like Main Menu on top ? No problem, delete it and insert module into area you wish.

Themes Completely change your website look, from simple page background to position of modules. Every kind of HTML can be easily converted to dynamic template. No programming skills needed. Convert existing static HTML website to z-admin dynamic website!

Roles / Logins Add unlimited number of Roles, and unlimited number of Users. Users can login to z-admin and write Articles, Polls, etc. With Roles you allow/disallow specific modules to user (e.g. allow user to write Articles, but disallow him to change modules on a website).

File Manager z-admin CMS includes File Manager with common functionalities, upload files, rename, move and copy files, delete files and folders. ZIP selected files. Download files, even restricted ones (like web.config, etc.). For most common tasks, you don't need external FTP program.

Twitter & Youtube Two of most popular web services are embedded inside z-admin. Create unlimited number of Twitter Widgets and YouTube video galleries.

Custom Items Completely redefine presentation of any Items in z-admin! Handle how Articles, News, Columns, Menus or any other Items are shown. Also, create custom SQL Table and use this module to display data! Define templates for Header, Footer, Item and Alternating Item and Separator. Write CSharp code along with SQL.

Dynamic Text Add Dynamic text formatted on Server! Use C# language to format text and display it on screen. Possible uses are: read Time/Date, get value from Database, read URL, get user Regional settings, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoran123456 (talk • contribs) 07:11, 5 September 2011 (UTC)


 * No, not yet. It needs it's own article first. Z-Admin does not exist. Jesus Presley (talk) 10:48, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Orchard
The most recent build of Orchard apparently doesn't support MySql (in fact only SQL Server and SQL Sever CE is supported). — Preceding unsigned comment added by PlaySharp (talk • contribs) 14:10, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Pines CMS
So I recently added Pines CMS to the list and it was removed because it doesn't have its own article. My question is, considering it's a very new CMS (first stable release Nov 12), is it notable enough to justify its own article? It's been around for about 3 years, but only with dev releases. It's certainly a bigger project (codebase wise) than most other CMSs on the list, but isn't as widely used. Some of its subprojects, like Pines Notify, are actually notable and fairly widely used, but not the CMS itself. And it does have quite a few development features that no other PHP CMS has. For example, a package manager and format written in all PHP. Anyway, I didn't want to create the article unless it was actually notable enough. Guywithcable (talk) 17:16, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Guywithcable, please review the WP:N guideline. I hope it will help you to decide if the article about Pines CMS worth spending time on its writing. --ElComandanteChe (talk) 19:36, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Out-of-date
The latest relase dates given in the tables often aren't latest. 134.96.90.19 (talk) 12:57, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * How can this process be improved or automated? Can we somehow transclude the latest versions from the software infoboxes?Jesus Presley (talk) 10:45, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Please add Getsimple (Category PHP flat file CMS)
I have used it a lot for smaller projects, it uses XML storage files, is well developed and very active. Latest release is April 1, 2012 http://get-simple.info. I can add it myself, if there are no objections. EDIT: I just saw that it needs it's own article. I'll try to create one in the near future, presuming that it fulfils the notabilty criteria. --Jesus Presley (talk) 15:10, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Jesus Presley (talk) 23:16, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Kirby CMS
I deleted Kirby, bc it is not notable (yet), it can't be found at http://www.cmscrawler.com/tool/ and it has a reputation for having very low coding standards (i.e. bad quality): http://t3seo.de/kirby-cms/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jesus Presley (talk • contribs) 08:17, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

I can't argue with the fact that Kirby can't be found at http://www.cmscrawler.com/tool/ since it has been launched in January. But claiming that Kirby's coding standards are low because of an article, which is out-dated and badly researched and taking that as a reason to delete Kirby seems not professionel to me at all and hurts my trust in Wikipedia. --Bastianallgeier (talk) 11:51, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

As the author of the article in Question there are two things I want to make clear: 1. Do I think Kirby CMS is a good CMS? No. 2. Should my opinion (which results from 1 hour of testing half a year ago) be taken as a proper source to judge wether this system is relevant for wikipedia or not? No! --Sgtypo3 (talk) 12:10, 17 October 2012 (UTC)


 * "since it has been launched in January": This indicates it has not reached notability yet. A CMS mentioned here needs it's own article, so you should start there. If (or when) you have sufficient secondary sources, feel free to add Kirby. --Jesus Presley (talk) 05:23, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Please add SDL Tridion
SDL Tridion (www.sdl.com/products/tridion/)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TommyWillB (talk • contribs) 18:42, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Redaxo
Reading the CMS list I missed Redaxo. Redaxo CMS is open source, PHP-based and uses MySQL. Latest version is 4.5, April 3rd, 2013. Link to the Redaxo site: http://www.redaxo.org --5.159.60.76 (talk) 14:26, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Why was e107 CMS removed from the list?
From what I can tell, e107 has been going for over 10 years. It seems their page was removed and their listing from this page. Does anyone know why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.171.12.89 (talk) 01:32, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * It was deleted following the deletion discussion in WP:Articles for deletion/E107 (software) (2nd nomination). Captain Conundrum (talk) 08:44, 21 May 2013 (UTC)