Talk:List of countries by number of billionaires/Archives/2013

Turkey should be listed in the Asian section
I have moved Turkey from the European to the Asian section.

The same answer to this

Turkey is a Transcontinental country, but it is considered a European Country, Turkey began full membership negotiations with the European Union in 2005, having been an associate member of the European Economic Community since 1963 and having joined the EU Customs Union in 1995. And Around 30 of the Turkish billionaires are located in Istanbul on the western side in East Thrace it is located entirely in Europe. The Country is also part of all European sport associations, as Football and Basketball, and is currently in the bid for the UEFA Euro 2020 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UEFA_Euro_2020

But don't feel bad, it is a common mistake to think that Turkey is part of the Middle East. Coloniasport (talk) 18:44, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * A country can't negotiate itself to a another continent. Turkey's area and population are mostly in Asia, so it should be listed as Asian. Russia's population, however, is mainly in Europe (even though area is mostly in Asia). 82.141.67.203 (talk) 01:54, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Why can't a country negotiate itself to another continent? Who made up that rule, and where is it written? It opens up a can of worms, but the logic of considering Europe to be a separate "continent" from Asia is extremely questionable anyway, because it makes the definition of continent much more complicated and less intuitive. If it weren't for "Europe" and "Asia", anyone (from any planet) could look at a physical globe and identify all of the continents on Earth. Why is India called a "subcontinent" and not a continent? India is diverse enough and populous enough to meet the same qualifications that supposedly make Europe a continent. What disqualifies India from continent status? GDP per capita? Why should that be a criterion? Australia is a continent with just one country, so number of countries has nothing to do with it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.169.116.140 (talk) 15:56, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Edit request from 220.253.194.21, 17 July 2010
editsemiprotected


 * 16||🇭🇺 Hungary|| align="center"|3||

220.253.194.21 (talk) 03:45, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 17:35, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from 220.253.194.21, 17 July 2010
editsemiprotected

Hungary has now got 3 offical billionaires so plz add to list

220.253.194.21 (talk) 03:47, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 17:35, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

edit request number of canadian Billionaries is 23 not 47. Please correct it soon.

Edit request from Supercomputtergeek, 28 October 2010
China has now 128 billionaires according to forbes : http://blogs.forbes.com/russellflannery/2010/10/28/forbes-china-rich-list-focus-number-of-billionaires-soars-to-record-128/

So please change 64 to 128

Supercomputtergeek (talk) 15:46, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Thanks, Stickee (talk)  23:48, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from Supercomputtergeek, 29 October 2010
You forgot to update the Asia section !! thanks

Supercomputtergeek (talk) 09:43, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Thanks, Stickee (talk)  23:56, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

France should have at least 49 billionaires according to http://www.challenges.fr/classements/fortune.php?limit=0&t=&s=ASC&search=&cible=&s=ASC depending upon the strength of the euro. Either way it is far more than 12. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.104.91.200 (talk) 04:18, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Mexico is part of North America
Mexico should be moved to the North America section and the Latin America section should be renamed Central and South America. In terms of geography, North, Central, and South are the correct usage, whereas Latin is a cultural division irrelevant for the purposes of this article.
 * I agree Mexico should be included in North American and would take it a step further and include Central America as well. The intro to the article states that the divisions are by continent, and Latin America (as well as Central America) is NOT a continent.  Also, the sectional lists need updating.   Lime in the Coconut   17:22, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

wrong numbers for Asia - They do not use the Forbes list
The list is way off China fell to 95 from 115 in 2011, far from the 271 on the list? http://www.forbes.com/sites/russellflannery/2012/03/09/chinas-billionaire-boom-halts-country-leads-world-in-forbes-list-drops/

and other numbers also very wrong, reopen this article so we can get et right lets update this page here http://www.forbes.com/lists/2011/10/billionaires_2011.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.52.111.183 (talk) 13:04, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

As seen here in the list by country from Forbes Russia has overtaken China and Germany overtaken India from the 2012 list http://www.rich-bastards.com/CountryRanking.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.52.111.183 (talk) 13:19, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Its true the figures are wrong and the others are old info, open article.

Well my my, that is true, the figures are all wrong and outdated, this must be fixed. Coloniasport (talk) 18:42, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

That is true! reopen article. 86.52.75.184 (talk) 21:59, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Outdated and unreliable sources
The list of billionaires by Continents are very outdated and do not follow the Forbes list which is the official list. here are the list for 2012 http://www.forbes.com/billionaires/ there are several different sources who are not reliable, we need to cleanup and update the list from forbes 2012.

Lactasamir (talk) 17:52, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting comment.svg Note: You are (now) a member of the autoconfirmed group, so you can be bold and update the list yourself.  — daranz [ t ] 23:37, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Header says this article uses 2013 figures, which is only true for the European list. At least 2012 is marked as the year in all the other tables.

And, even the main top ten list has wrong percentages. Not a single one of them are right. Though it does not matter since it should be updated with new figures. 82.141.67.203 (talk) 02:19, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Edit request 17.03.2013: Billionaires per 10M inhabitants
Canada: 25 billionairs / 33 m population = 7.6, not 1.08 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.16.210.247 (talk) 20:50, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

alternate study
Another ref:

EllenCT (talk) 07:57, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Unlock the topic for corrections
There are some mistakes. Both in 2012 and in 2013 Brazil ranked as having a higher number of billionaires than Britain, f.e. The way the data is presented is highly misleading. Grenzer22 (talk) 14:30, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

One can check it here: in 2013, there were 46 Brazilian billionaires (http://www.forbes.com/sites/ricardogeromel/2013/03/06/full-list-latin-american-billionaires-of-2013/). The data is clearly wrong, and I guess the topic should be opened for the necessary fixing. Thanks in advance.Grenzer22 (talk) 12:24, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Inconsistency in the article
The numbers Billionaires by nation and in the specific countries are not the same i.e. china,russia... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.16.125.106 (talk) 09:04, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Edit request on 25 June 2013
There are eight(8) Pakistani billionaires as per the latest figures published on Wikipedia(25-6-2013)

188.54.150.243 (talk) 23:04, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Could you please link to a source so that I can verify the (8) number? ~Adjwilley (talk) 23:30, 26 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Closing due to lack of response from requester. -- El Hef  ( Meep? ) 18:40, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Brazil
The topic is still outdated and with wrong information, and one cannot fix it, since the article is protected.Grenzer22 (talk) 13:25, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
There are around 64 USD billionaires in the KSA, not 8 as stated. As a mater of fact, all the Middle East figures are off, Here is a list: http://english.alarabiya.net/en/business/economy/2013/11/07/Saudis-top-list-of-Mideast-billionaires.html ibnAnwar80 —Preceding undated comment added 16:00, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Turkey - Asia or Europe?
97% of Turkey is located in Asia yet it's listed under Europe and adds to the European figure. I doubt that all Turkish billionaires are on the European side, what are some other people's opinions on this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.136.56.67 (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2013 (UTC)