Talk:List of court cases involving Alliance Defending Freedom

"Important precedent":NPOV problem
I have marked Masterpiece Cakeshop's entry as being POV. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 00:11, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
 * , please, take your edits here, first.
 * Accidentally left ref off of last edit. POV issue is resolved.– Lionel(talk) 03:23, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't think so..."Important", to me, sounds like a value judgment. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 03:44, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
 * In this case it is not a value judgment. It is objective. OED defines landmark as "An event or discovery marking an important stage or turning point in something." Source says "[Masterpiece Cakeshop] could be a landmark..." Thus use of "important" in the article is acceptable.– Lionel(talk) 04:16, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
 * OK, I'll add "according to [the source]", in exchange for removal of the tag. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 04:20, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Nice doing business with you.– Lionel(talk) 04:31, 24 February 2018 (UTC)