Talk:List of diplomatic missions of Niue

Discussion at WP:FOR on formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" article
There is now a discussion at WP:FOR on the formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" articles. As this discussion ostensibly could affect this article, editors are encouraged to provide their opinions on the WP:FOR at this link - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_International_relations - please do not discuss on this article talk page as valid points for consideration may very well not be seen by editors at large. Thank you, --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 00:13, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Non-diplomatic missions

 * 🇦🇺 Australia
 * Brisbane (Tourist office)
 * Melbourne (Tourist office)
 * 🇳🇿 New Zealand
 * Auckland (Tourist office)
 * 🇺🇸 United States
 * Lexington (Tourist office)

The above was added to the article (data is from the source already present) to follow up on what's already announced in the lead ("Niue also has a few honorary consulates and non-diplomatic representatives.")

It's a common practice for those articles to include missions that aren't "diplomatic" in the strict sense of this word - when the state in questions has/hosts only a few "real" diplomatic missions/embassies. See for example the "Representative and Trade Offices" here.

I propose restoring the tourist offices section. Japinderum (talk) 14:41, 30 January 2012 (UTC)


 * AFAIK, there is no common practice to include missions that are not diplomatic. In fact, there is a very relevant and interesting debate going on at the moment about the inclusion of non-diplomatic offices of Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic to the diplomatic lists []. There is strong consensus that these missions should not be added to these lists. For more info on this discussion, see this page's talk page.
 * With respect to the ROC missions, these missions (and their staff) arguably enjoy more privileges than any tourist office and their staff. Also, the ROC representatives are generally diplomatically appointed by the Taipei government. I would expect that this is not the case with the Niue tourist representatives. If addition of tourist offices to these lists was generally accepted, then these lists would lose their original purpose: to show information about diplomatic missions in/of a specific country.
 * I therefore suggest that tourist offices should not be included in the Niue lists; only the diplomatic missions. Alternatively, I suggest that a separate list of non-diplomatic offices are added or that the tourist offices are added to [].


 * Best Sir Tanx (talk) 17:19, 30 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Forgot to mention that honorary consulates are not usually included in these lists either since they also are not diplomatic missions. But the consensus is not as strong on this point as some editors tend to insist on their inclusion. I suggest that the honorary consulate in Auckland is also removed.
 * Best Sir Tanx (talk) 17:22, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on List of diplomatic missions of Niue. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20160121002715/http://www.niue.de/index.php?did=niue_representatives_overseas_historical_list.pdf to http://www.niue.de/index.php?did=niue_representatives_overseas_historical_list.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070927004154/http://www.knowledge-basket.co.nz/regs/regs/text/2001/2001006.txt to http://www.knowledge-basket.co.nz/regs/regs/text/2001/2001006.txt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 03:12, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of diplomatic missions of Niue. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131019223055/http://legal.un.org/repertory/art102/english/rep_supp8_vol6-art102_e_advance.pdf to http://legal.un.org/repertory/art102/english/rep_supp8_vol6-art102_e_advance.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:18, 21 May 2017 (UTC)