Talk:List of disability studies journals

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedy deleted as having no substantive content, because... (there are many journals pages can be listed and external list can be added) --Withkamlesh (talk) 17:34, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Comliance with guidelines
Please could editors comply with the guidelines at WP:Stand-alone lists and also with Manual of Style/Lead section by providing in the lead citation to sources that establish the selection criteria, and by providing the necessary background information, and references to sources for that background information, that would indicate encyclopaedic content? --Bejnar (talk) 21:44, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Duplicative ?
Could editors explain why this article is not unnecessarily duplicative of Category:Disability studies and Category:Disability publications? Categories are auto-maintaining, lists require editor attention, so absent a reason for a separate list, the category would be preferred. --Bejnar (talk) 21:50, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * WP:NOTDUP. (categories aren't an alternative or competitor to a list, they're a complement). I don't know if this is a notable topic. I tend to think it might be (feel free to AfD, of course), but it's not redundant/duplicative. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 00:29, 9 October 2015 (UTC)