Talk:List of events at T-Mobile Arena

Sections?
Instead of a color coding table, would it be easier to do a musical events section, sports event section, and an other section? Also, it would look a lot nicer if the dates were in actual chronological order. I know it'll have repetition, but merging dates in the same row looks confusing and disorganized. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 18:21, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I think organizing the list by date is the most natural choice for a list of events; breaking it into sections by the type of event would feel disjointed to me. As for the events that have separate dates merged into a single row (like George Strait's residency), I don't feel strongly about it - I combined them so as that the list wouldn't seem like it's dominated by one performer as you skim through, but it could cause a bit of confusion by having the dates out of order. Toohool (talk) 18:38, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of events at T-Mobile Arena. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160729002102/http://www.usctrojans.com/sports/m-baskbl/spec-rel/072716aad.html to http://www.usctrojans.com/sports/m-baskbl/spec-rel/072716aad.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:07, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

This link is functioning fine, so I reverted the change. Perhaps it was down temporarily. I will monitor it a bit and see if the issue returns. dawnleelynn(talk) 19:51, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Las Vegas Review-Journal Comment
I came to this page from my Watchlist when I was notified that the IABot made a change. I reversed the change because the link seemed to be live and only temporarily down. Then I ran this tool and it showed a number of broken links. Also, a dead link since there didn't seem to be a working replacement in the Internet Archive Wayback Machine for it. I saw an editor replace the dead link with a working link almost immediately after I posted it. So, I became curious. Apparently, all of the Las Vegas Review-Journal links that stopped working were not actually pulled from the web site, but instead reorganized. I tried one and I was able to remove the archive link and replace it with a live link. I wish I had known before I replaced a mess of links with archives. If someone wants to replace the archive links with the updated live links, they can do so. I can't do it tonight that's for sure. If I have time tomorrow, I'll see if I can do it. It's no difference replacing the dead links or the archive links with updated live links. I would revert the archive links, but actually it's better having them until the updated links are put in, better an archive link than a dead link. dawnleelynn(talk) 04:12, 31 December 2017 (UTC)