Talk:List of exhibitions by Olafur Eliasson

Citation
There is no source for this list. ludahai 魯大海 07:15, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Inactive?
This list may suggest that he was inactive after 2007. Is it really so?

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on List of exhibitions by Olafur Eliasson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://www.berlin-kopenhagen.de/eliasson00.html
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20130111132201/http://www.berlin-kopenhagen.de/olafureliasson2003.html to http://www.berlin-kopenhagen.de/olafureliasson2003.html
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20130111133443/http://www.berlin-kopenhagen.de/oecs1.html to http://www.berlin-kopenhagen.de/oecs1.html
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20130111122021/http://www.berlin-kopenhagen.de/ to http://www.berlin-kopenhagen.de/
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20130111122021/http://www.berlin-kopenhagen.de/ to http://www.berlin-kopenhagen.de/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:39, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

first discussion in over a decade - delete?
This article was nominated for deletion in 2010 by, and the result was keep. I'm pinging who are the remaining active editors from that conversation. When editing artist biographies we try to avoid long lists like this, because they are like CVs. I have never seen a list of exhibitions as a separate list. I actually did a search, and found that this is the only such list in all of Wikipedia. I'm inclined to nominate this for deletion again (with the suggestion that this be merged into the prose of the main article's exhibitions section) but I wanted to raise a conversation here with the invested parties. --Theredproject (talk) 17:16, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I said at the previous round, "excessive detail for anyone who is merely notable and not famous. In the absence of a book about him, he is not yet famous (sat least that's my minimum criterion for famous) I tend to be mergist on these lists--I think they are generally more useful as part of the article. " ; turned out that there is a book, but that minimum criterion I suggested was very  much too minimal. I should have realized there were individual books about many thousands of artists, and that's really just the criterion for clearly notable.  Since 07 we've greatly  expanded our art coverage, and it is established every individual major work of every very notable artist can justify an article, but no artist at all has a separate list of exhibitions.  I can see that some might possibly be justified, but we should start at he top, not the middle. This is a candidate for merge, and I do not see who would oppose. if anyone does, it can be discussed.  DGG ( talk ) 05:37, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that confirmation --Theredproject (talk) 18:49, 5 February 2019 (UTC)