Talk:List of fascist movements by country N–T

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of fascist movements by country N–T. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050914081835/http://members.libreopinion.com/falangeperu/ to http://members.libreopinion.com/falangeperu

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:17, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:07, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
 * National Socialist Dutch Workers Party logo.svg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:24, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Grey Wolves Gokturk Flag.svg

Economic Freedom Fighters
I am about to remove the South African Economic Freedom Fighters from this list for two reasons: first, there has been no consensus on the party's article about characterising it as a fascist party, and I think we should await such consensus; and second, the citations here are not sufficient to support the categorisation. I have looked at the ten citations used and they show that four people have argued the EFF should be viewed as fascist: one, Vishwas Satgar, in an academic article, and three others (Gareth van Onselen, Adam Habib, and Prince Mashele) in newspaper columns (only one of which, van Onselen's, makes the argument in any detail). Here are the citations:


 * ✅ – Satgar argues that existing conceptualisations of fascism are too narrow to capture  of parties like the EFF.

Hope this makes sense to everyone. If not, I think the EFF–fascism conversation should probably be had at Talk:Economic Freedom Fighters. Jlalbion (talk) 14:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
 * ✅ – This was the start of a lot of the EFF fascism discourse. In an opinion piece in HuffPost, van Onselen uses Ur-Fascism to argue that  I would note that van Onselen is the former director of communications for the opposition Democratic Alliance.
 * ✅ Habib argues in the Daily Maverick that
 * ✅ – In his Sowetan column, Prince Mashele argues that
 * – This is Mashele rehashing his column on the radio the morning after it was published.
 * – The writer says at the outset . This article is angry response to those who call the EFF fascist:
 * – In an early version of his 'Black Neofascism?' argument (above), Vishwas Satgar writes that
 * – Apart from the clickbait title, this article refers to fascism once:
 * For the record, Habib's essay (a companion to his article above) holds: (my emphasis).
 * – UKZN academic Imraan Buccus, in a lecture for a popular audience, concludes that (because it accepts constitutionalism and the rule of law), although.
 * – This is a repeated citation.