Talk:List of highest-grossing animated films/Archive 7

Timeline of highest grossing amited film
What was the biggest before toy story 3 and the lion king

Error
On Highest-grossing_animated_franchises_and_film_series under Cars (franchise). It dose not have the box offie rusuilts for Planes Which it dose under [office performance] Please sort it out

top 25 highest grossing series & franiches
as the list is worng. I put a right list up. rank	film series & franchies	box offie ($)	average ($)	next out

1	sherk	3,510,516,231	702,103,246	TBA

2	ice age	2,802,576,893	700,644,223	July 15, 2016

3	toy story	1,942,430,426	647,476,809	TBA

4	madagaser	1,883,502,299	627,834,100	November 26, 2014

5	despicble me	1,513,175,250	756,587,625	July 10, 2015

6	monster inc	1,306,375,863	653,187,932	TBA

7	kung fu panda	1,297,436,841	648,718,421	December 23, 2015

8	cars	1,241,624,257	413,874,752	July 18, 2014

9	the lion knig	987,483,777	329,161,259	TBA

10	finding nemo	936,743,261	936,743,261	June 17, 2016

11	rio	907,300,760	453,650,380	still in cinema

12	pokemon	887,715,342	55,482,209	July 19, 2014

13	happy feet	534,742,074	267,371,037	TBA

14	the simpoins	527,071,022	527,071,022	TBA

15	cloudy with a chance of meatballs	517,332,075	258,666,038	TBA

16	Alaadin	504,050,219	126,012,554.75	TBA

17	cased colse	471,089,317	27,711,136	April 19, 2014

18	trazan	448,191,819	149,397,273	TBA

19	beaute & the besat 	424,967,620	106,241,905	TBA

20	monster vs aliens	381,509,870	381,509,870	TBA

21	tintin	373,993,951	46749244	2015

22	pocahontas	346,079,773	173,039,887	TBA

23	the jungle book	341,547,211	170,773,606	TBA

24	the hunchback of noter dame	325,338,851	108,446,284	TBA

25	bambi	302405787	151202893.5	TBA
 * With the exception of Case Closed, the rest of the list is wrong, the direct-to-video sequels dosen't count for this list, only theatrically release films are counted for this list. So to understand it better, a film series needs to have at least 2 theatrically released films to get on this list.

Bambi 2 was theatrically release oh why is it not top 25? like [|Highest grossing franchises and film series]== Also frinchies & series [|The Lion King] are still a farnchies at the end of the day.
 * Yes it is, and the two films have about $302 million together, but because a Top 20 can't be made at this moment because of some uncertainty series, the top will remain at 15 for now, so Bambi is considerable for a Top 20 when the time comes. As for Lion King, yes it is a franchise, but a franchise that contains: a theatrically released film, two direct-to-video sequels, and other tv series, BUT it dosen't have at least two theatrically released films, as I said earlier, this page counts only films and series that are theatrically released, not any kind of media franchise.

winne the pooh
here is the WTP franchise box office

film	gross ($)	Average ($)

winne the pooh	262,447,867. 52,489,573.40

main series	50,559,088	25,279,544

winne the pooh	44,692,846

The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh	5,866,242

spin off	211,888,779	70,629,593

the tiger movie 	96,159,800

piglets big movie	62,870,546

Pooh's Heffalump Movie	52,858,433


 * The franchise is incomplete, as we don't know yet the gross for The Many Adventures

Found some gross ($) form TMAOWTP

Q & A
O.K will u do it in the future? Is there anywhere I can go to have a look at a bigger list of worldwide total for stop-motion animated films? How many more stop-motion animated films you needed to make it longer? How many do you have so far? Could animes be longer?

Timeline of highest grossing amited film
What was the biggest before toy story 3 and the lion king

Error
On Highest-grossing_animated_franchises_and_film_series under Cars (franchise). It dose not have the box offie rusuilts for Planes Which it dose under [office performance] Please sort it out

winne the pooh
here is the WTP franchise box office

film	gross ($)	Average ($)

winne the pooh	262,447,867. 52,489,573.40

main series	50,559,088	25,279,544

winne the pooh	44,692,846

The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh	5,866,242

spin off	211,888,779	70,629,593

the tiger movie 	96,159,800

piglets big movie	62,870,546

Pooh's Heffalump Movie	52,858,433


 * The franchise is incomplete, as we don't know yet the gross for The Many Adventures

Found some gross ($) form TMAOWTP

Q & A
O.K will u do it in the future? Is there anywhere I can go to have a look at a bigger list of worldwide total for stop-motion animated films? How many more stop-motion animated films you needed to make it longer? How many do you have so far? Could animes be longer?

by year
I do not know if this is the right by page but on on the List of animated feature films lists could we add a awards sections like List of years in film.

studio
colud we have a line or two most suscful animated studio at box office total and average? the average is pixar ($609.4 millon) and the total is Disney but with how much we need to work out?

Sisi ni Sawa
I was looking at the Simba's Pride and it says was theatrically released in European and Latin American countries in spring 1999 however I can not find any box office numbers dose any one know anything? Also Hakuna Matata theatrically released internationally and in selected cities in the United States

Box Office Mojo concern
It appears that most of the sources for this article are from Box Office Mojo. However, I guess Box Office Mojo only ranks the highest grossing domestic animated films and doesn't include foreign gross for some reason, (see here and here). This article is about the highest grossing films worldwide, not just domestic. So on this article, The Lion King is ranked at #4, yet according to the ref:http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=lionking.htm it is ranked 2 for animation, because BOM won't include foreign gross. Minions are ranked at #2 on this list, but the BOM source lists them at #8 for animation:http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=minions.htm, etc. Shouldn't the sources match the claim? Is it wrong that we expect people to do the math and add the domestic gross to the foreign gross located on BOM? Should we instead look for other sources? The reason I ask this is there has been dispute on Zootopia over whether it is better to say "Zootopia is the 9th highest grossing animated film and eighth highest grossing computer animated film" and then give a reference to BOM, which currently lists it at 9 for animation and 8 for computer animation, or to say "Zootopia is the fifth highest-grossing animated film and the fourth highest-grossing computer animated film" with no reference so that it matches this article. Sro23 (talk) 03:50, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
 * To clarify, since the dispute on Zootopia concerns a paragraph detailing worldwide box office performance, the alternative to stating the worldwide animated ranking would be to remove the statement from that section altogether rather than to state the domestic grosses with a reference to BOM. Jaoakley (talk) 20:28, 26 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Doens't matter now, Box Office Mojo just lowered The Lion King's worldwide gross, now listing it behind Zootopia and Despicable Me 22602:304:CFD3:2EE0:E42C:7D5E:31CA:82A0 (talk) 01:27, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Crayon Shin-chan
Should Crayon Shin-chan be into subsections " The storm Called" "The legend called" And some which are on their own — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talk) 17:30, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

New page
Anyone intervene in Draft:List of longest runing animated tv series — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talk) 14:57, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

The edit is not saving!
The edits which i do, do not save and it saves after 1 or 2 days. Please do some repairing, i can't save my edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dark 356 (talk • contribs) 12:46, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

An American tail
Where does this $150 millon come everywhere I look is $84,355,863 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talk) 09:29, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
 * It was adjusted by YOU a few months ago with no explanation: . Betty Logan (talk) 10:33, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Pixar update
http://forums.boxofficetheory.com/topic/20314-finding-dory-4117-m-overseas-8875%C2%A0m-worldwide/?page=32 Pixar has updated almost of all of their films:

Toy Story 3's WW-gross is now $1.067B....finally overtaking Pirates 2: Dead Man's Chest's $1.066B. Finding Nemo is now at $940M WW.....overtaking Harry Potter 5's $939M. Monsters University increased to $744M. Up is now from $731M to $735M. The Incredibles is now at $633M (Overtaking Kung Fu Panda's $631M) Ratatouille went down to $620M WW. Monsters Inc has gone from $562M to $577M WW! Cars 2 increased now to $562M WW Brave got to over $540M WW. WALL-E went up from $521M to $533M WW. Cars went a bit up $462M WW....since it's OS-gross is now $218M. Toy Story 2 had an insane WW-update. It went from $485M to $497M! $12M difference. Now it's OS total is higher than it's DOM-total. Even the first Toy Story saw a late update....and it went up! Now it's at $373M WW. (Finally overtaking Die Hard: With a Vengeance's $366M for the biggest movie of 1995.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.81.58.55 (talk) 20:10, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Is anyone gonna do the peak section? I do the editing of grosses myself, but I'm not good with the peak section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.81.58.55 (talk) 22:22, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Wallace & Gromit
and I are having a dispute over the stop-motion section. They want to include the sentence "All films in the Wallace and Gromit Franchise are on the list." I feel this is misleading, because, for one thing, most of the Wallace and Gromit films are shorts, so they're not even eligible for the list. One could say "All of the Wallace and Gromit-related theatrically-released features are on the list," which while correct is so long and qualified to mention two films (three if you count Shaun the Sheep Movie). Thoughts? Trivialist (talk) 13:38, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
 * if we do what you are saying than we need to do the same to the other lists to make fair I.e not all Shrek films are on the CG list it is missing Shrek in the Swamp Karaoke Dance Party, Shrek 4-D, etc
 * P.s there 2 w&g films The Curse of The Were-Rabbit & Shaun Movie the compilation courts to the total gross but the avenge will still be dived by 2 like toy story   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talk) 14:15, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I have no problem with changing the Shrek listing to be more accurate. Also, you should sign your messages, which you can do by putting ~ at the end of your message. Trivialist (talk) 15:08, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
 * You could just say all "feature films" which would omit the shorts by definition. Betty Logan (talk) 02:20, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

CSC
Should Crayon Shin-chan be into subsections " The storm Called" "The legend called" And some which are on their own 82.38.157.176 (talk) 15:59, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Expand
We can know expand the franchise list


 * {{legend|#b6fcb6|size=50%| Background shading indicates films playing in the week commencing in theaters around the world.}}

There might be another series I look in too it later

I don't know, all of those extra franchises, ranging The Jungle Book to Rugrats seem kinda pointless, considering that these franchises barely grossed any money in comparison to major animated film franchises like Toy Story, Shrek, Madagascar and Ice Age. Superchunk22 (talk) 21:37, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

future stop motion
Is there any stop motion film we can get on the chart next year? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talk) 6:51, 8 November 2016

Help
Dose anyone want to help with Draft:List of highest-grossing animted films in Canada and the United States82.38.157.176 (talk) 11:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Moana entered the list
Moana has entered the top 50 of both highest-grossing films and computer animation and nobody bothered to put it up but me? When Sing comes to the top 50, I except it to be on the list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.81.58.55 (talk) 04:55, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

The day of the week that is used to say "films playing on the week commencing on" is friday.
The day of the week that is used to say "films playing on the week commencing on" is friday, it seems however more logical to use monday as this is internationally accepted in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601#Week_dates I would have just changed it but I was wondering if any refreshing mechanics would break down. Royabspoel (talk) 21:37, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Kubo and The Nightmare Before Christmas
82.38.157.176 (talk)‎. . (192,707 bytes) (+28)‎. . (Undid revision 761419653 by Telewski (talk) this includes reissue of TNB4C and the Chinese relase of kubo) Based on the references presently provided, there is no verification of the claims currently posted for these two films. If one is going to provide new data above and beyond a current footnote/reference, that that editor needs to provide the proper documentation. As presently listed, the reference is for the Box Office Mojo web site which does not support these edits or data. Please provide the proper documentation. Thank you. Telewski (talk) 01:35, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

TNBC was playing recently but has collesd with it total being $81,877,069

While Kubo open in China and gross an additional $5,275,155 and is was  playing in grease adding $2,406 up to Jan 1 and Bulgaria upto Jan 15 adding in $15,691  Plus the $69,929,545 WW as of Dec 18 gives a total of $75,222,797as of 22nd of Jan 2017  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talk) 18:24, 24 January 2017 (UTC)


 * OK, very good. For TNBC maybe a second footnote needs to be added on the page with http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/intl/?id=_fTHENIGHTMAREBEFO01&country=UK&wk=2016W51&id=_fTHENIGHTMAREBEFO01&p=.htm.


 * For Kobo, this appears to be a similar situation as that for FROZEN, however, unlike FROZEN, BOM likely will update the total as it is still clearly playing internationally. If it does not, then a similar footnote may need to be created similar to what Betty Logan produced for FROZEN. But let's wait and give BOM a chance to update the box office total.Telewski (talk) 23:58, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Expend
Can we expend the main, computer, tradinal — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talk) 13:30, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Box Office Mojo vs. The Numbers
Another editor and I have been back and forth on the box office gross for one particular recent film (Your Name, if it matters). The Numbers has a figure that's about $3 million higher than Box Office Mojo, so it seemed worth asking, which is the more reliable source when they disagree with one another? What I see for most other films listed on the page is that Box Office Mojo is used for the figures on a vast majority of them, whereas The Numbers is only referenced for a half dozen or so other films, all of them dating from the 1970s or earlier. mwalimu59 (talk) 13:51, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Both sources are reliable, so barring a mistake by one of the trackers the real question is why is there a discrepency. Discrepencies between these sites arise for mainly two reasons: i) one site has had a more recent update; ii) the dollar conversion was undertaken at different dates so they used different exchange rates. In this case I think the difference is due to the first reason: Box Office Mojo last updated its foreign gross on March 26 while The Numbers last updated the foreign gross on April 8. It seems clear to me that in this particular instance Box Office Mojo is lagging with their updates so I would use The Numbers as a source until Box Office Mojo catches up with its updates. Betty Logan (talk) 14:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Good point but I'm still skeptical. For more than two months, The Numbers was showing a figure from January that wasn't being updated, while Box Office Mojo continued to track a trickle of receipts from Japan and South Korea, and all the while The Numbers had a figure that was around $3M higher than BOM. My suspicion is that someone went with The Numbers figure because it was higher. mwalimu59 (talk) 15:22, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * It is not really that important why somebody chose The Numbers over Box Office Mojo, what matters is which source is most likely to be correct. Looking over the figures neither seem to be fully up to date:
 * BOM has not updated Australia at all this year, meaning the higher figure of $927,335 from The Numbers is probably correct.
 * BOM has a more up to date figure for China, listing it at $83,678,210.
 * The Numbers does not have a figure for France while BOM has the gross at $1,412,916.
 * The Numbers is more up to date for New Zealand and has the gross at $128,174.
 * The Numbers is more up to date than BOM for South Korea but has a lower figure: $25,862,299 (The Numbers), $26,262,282 (BOM); probably an exchange rate fluctuation, so let's round it to $26 million.
 * BOM has a figure for Thailand while The Numbers does not: $1,222,693
 * BOM is more up to date for the UK and has the gross at $466,772.
 * Both sources have the US gross at $1,600,000.
 * That brings the non-Japanese total to $115 million.
 * That brings us to Japan. BOM has the gross at $214,753,096 while the more up to date The Numbers has it at $222,870,478. This discrepency is probably due to different exchange rates. According to BOM, Your Name had grossed ¥24,651,507,890, which was equivalent to $214,753,096 using the conversion rate on March 12 (US $1 = 114.79 Yen). According to List of highest-grossing films in Japan Your Name has grossed ¥24.83 billion to date, which would convert to $223 million using last week's exchange rate (US $1 = 111.39 Yen). The difference in yen is negligible but the reason it is higher on The Numbers is because they are using a different exchange rate. Betty Logan (talk) 16:12, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * First of all, kudos for doing such a detailed analysis of the differences between the two sites. I appreciate the effort you went to to go digging into how each site arrived at their figures, and I hope other editors here do too.
 * So where does that leave us? Both seem to have their advantages and shortcomings. Aggregating the results of the two sites is not something that would be feasible on an ongoing basis, especially considering how many other films this sort of comparison and discussion could apply to. For the sake of having an apples-to-apples comparison between films, should we pick one and stick with it whenever possible? I suppose that would depend in part on whether the results of the two sites tends to deviate more during active release of a film but converges more over time as the final numbers from each country come in and get incorporated into the results. mwalimu59 (talk) 17:49, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Sometimes this happens. Different sources have different figures for Gone with the Wind (film) but they all agree it has grossed over $390 million so we just have ">$390 million" in the infobox. It is basically the best you can do without a definitive figure. Both Box Office Mojo and The Numbers concur that Your Names has grossed at least $330 million so I would go with ">$330 million" and use both sources. If we there isn't a good reason for picking one source over another (i.e. one of them is wrong or outdated) then ideally both should be represented. Betty Logan (talk) 14:13, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Franchise section edits
Can someone check Crayon Shin-chan? 82.38.157.176 (talk) 14:52, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I will do it tomorrow when I have time, that's if someone didn't fix it already. DCF94 (talk) 18:55, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The Franchises and film series section has been working with some unsourced figuers for awhile now, more precisely the anime franchises, I couldn't find the time nor good source to try and rectify that problem until today, with the help of, I found distribution revenues for anime films dating back to 1980, and managed to approximately convert the yen into dollar with "fxtop.com", because the converted figuers were a little smaller than the unsourced ones that were posted, some franchises like Dragon Ball and Crayon Shin-chan have fallen out of the Top 25. I ask you to check the links in the reference section before editing or undo my edits, also here are the calculations for DB and Crayon to see why they fallen out, also I want to point out that some years have missing links because the films on that year didn't accumulated at least ¥1 billion so it wasn't posted on that years list, however, even with the unsourced figuers, DB and Crayon still had under $290 million.


 * Dragon Ball
 * 1986 film:
 * 1987 film:
 * 1988 film:
 * 1989 film:
 * 1990 march film:
 * 1990 july film:
 * 1991 march film:
 * 1991 july film:
 * 1992 march film:
 * 1992 july film:
 * 1993 march film:
 * 1993 july film:
 * 1994 march film:
 * 1994 july film:
 * 1995 march film:
 * 1995 july film:
 * 1996 film:
 * 2013 film:
 * 2015 film:
 * 2015 film:


 * Crayon Shin-chan
 * 1993 film:
 * 1994 film:
 * 1995 film:
 * 1996 film:
 * 1997 film:
 * 1998 film:
 * 1999 film:
 * 2000 film:
 * 2001 film:
 * 2002 film:
 * 2003 film:
 * 2004 film:
 * 2005 film:
 * 2006 film:
 * 2007 film: DCF94 (talk) 18:56, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * 2007 film: DCF94 (talk) 18:56, 8 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Is there anymore frogin (none American) franchises we need to look in too? I had a look at the page above and can't make sentence of it. A franchise Whitch we could look is Boonie Bears (I think its around $209 million) ?82.132.184.231 (talk) 16:04, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I checked that franchise at the beggning of the year when the 4th movie was released, it's not there yet, but it is possible after next year's movie release for the series to be featured on the Top 25, seeing how every movie earnes more than the previous. DCF94 (talk) 17:02, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Is there any more franchise  you know of? 82.38.157.176 (talk) 18:20, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Can Dragon ball z be added into all time animated movies list, since One piece and Pokemon are in the list, it clearly indicates anime can also be added.--IM3847 (talk) 16:30, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

I prosome you talked about franchise list see above? 82.38.157.176 (talk) 17:00, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Like I said in the above Franchise section edits post, those films don't have enough to make the list, yes they could if other films will be released in the future. DCF94 (talk) 18:56, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

I thought Dragon Ball did have enough to get into the top 25 franchises?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.1.29.69 (talk) 00:15, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

future animated franchise
Is they any more franchise whitch can get on the chart next year?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talk) 6:51, 8 November 2016

The Lego batman movie is already released ਬੱਬੂ ਬਰਾੜ (talk) 13:14, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

The Lego batman movie's total gross is $310,850,384ਬੱਬੂ ਬਰਾੜ (talk) 02:30, 28 June 2017 (UTC) ਬੱਬੂ ਬਰਾੜ (talk) 02:30, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Yes I knew that this was just incase there one I left out 82.38.157.176 (talk) 08:49, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Hakuna Matata
Do we know if the 2019 The Lion King film will qualify for this page if it dose will it also  qualify as a franchise with the 1994 one? 82.38.157.176 (talk) 17:06, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
 * As far as I know, Lion King '19 will be part motion capture like The Jungle Book (2016 film), unlike SpongeBob who is partly CG and hand drawn animation, motion capture is not an animation technique as per the Academy rule, therefore no, it doesn't qualifies for this page. DCF94 (talk) 18:45, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

2018

 * {{legend|#b6fcb6|size=50%| Background shading indicates that at least one film in the series is playing in the week commencing in theaters around the world.}}

These are the 2018 franchises to keep I eye on to see if it can break on the list is there any I am missing82.38.157.176 (talk) 10:34, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Animated media franchises
Should we add a bit about animted media franchises a bit like List of highest-grossing films82.38.157.176 (talk) 19:58, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of highest-grossing animated films. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130710100737/http://www.boxoffice.com/statistics/movies/cinderella-1950 to http://www.boxoffice.com/statistics/movies/cinderella-1950
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130710100711/http://www.boxoffice.com/statistics/movies/101-dalmatians-1961 to http://www.boxoffice.com/statistics/movies/101-dalmatians-1961

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:54, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Raking adjusted for inflation
Should there be a section for this?★Trekker (talk) 16:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are refereing to a "Domestic highest-grossing adjusted" list, no! because this is a Worldwide page, that belongs on a "List of highest-grossing animated films in Canada & US" page... If we're talking about a Top 10 Worldwide Adjusted for inflation list, yes! unfortunally the source in the highest-grossing films page doesn't offer us enough animated films (only Snow White in fact) and there are no other credible sources for it, I tried searching! at least until last year when I did, if you found something let me know. DCF94 (talk) 17:15, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

New page
There is now a List of highest grossing hybrid films page if anyone wants a look to improve it now as it is a real page dose any rember our talk form 2015. 92.232.119.244 (talk) 19:31, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of highest-grossing animated films. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141219035352/http://pro.boxoffice.com/statistics/movies/pinocchio-1940 to http://pro.boxoffice.com/statistics/movies/pinocchio-1940
 * Added tag to http://www.boxoffice.com/statistics/movies/snow-white-and-the-seven-dwarfs-re-issue-1987-1987
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140819090718/http://www.boxoffice.com/statistics/movies/snow-white-and-the-seven-dwarfs-re-issue-1993-1993 to http://www.boxoffice.com/statistics/movies/snow-white-and-the-seven-dwarfs-re-issue-1993-1993
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130808115908/http://moviereviewsbymatt.wordpress.com/2013/08/03/robin-hood-the-outlaw-brought-to-us-by-errol-flynn-disney-kevin-costner-and-russell-crowe/ to http://moviereviewsbymatt.wordpress.com/2013/08/03/robin-hood-the-outlaw-brought-to-us-by-errol-flynn-disney-kevin-costner-and-russell-crowe

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:33, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Animation records
Does anyone want to help me created a new page entitled Animation records? 92.232.119.244 (talk) 20:13, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

2018
Here the 2018 animted franchise and 2018 stop motion does anyone have any enetry on both list I am missing if so P+T add it to them. 92.233.114.139 (talk) 12:25, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

franchise

 * {{legend|#b6fcb6|size=50%| Background shading indicates that at least one film in the series is playing in the week commencing in theaters around the world.}}

Stop motion animation

 * {{legend|#b6fcb6|indicates films playing in theaters around the world in the week commencing .|text=}}

talk
The figure for The Aristocrats initial run is exactly the same as the all-time rental reported by Variety in the 1990s (but later mysteriously not included from later lists) which seems a bit coincidental.

The initial US and Canada rental per Variety prior to the first re-issue noted is $11.4 million. On The Aristocats page it notes that it had a foreign gross of $16 million sourced from page 52 of Walt Disney's Nine Old Men and the Art of Animation. Disney Editions by Canemaker, John (2001). Does anyone know what this figure is represent? Is it initial release or all time? Is it the rental or gross? If it is the all time figure, it seems pretty low given the reported 12 million admissions all-time in France and being the most popular general release in the UK in 1971. If it is the initial foreign rental, then the initial worldwide rental would be similar to that reported ($27 million). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sudiani (talk • contribs) 01:02, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
 * someone needs to look in at that also someone needs to look at your recent TJB update the source you put is not coming up when a went to it? Fanoflionking (talk) 20:43, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
 * For The Jungle Book update, you would need to go to the archives of Variety to see the Disney 80th anniversary edition and chart that was published in 2003. I don't have access to their archives.  I believe I have the issue at home and will add a page reference when I have it.  I doubt the list is available online elsewhere.  It seems a much more accurate figure than the previous figure on this site and Box Office Mojo.  It has a reported US gross of $141 million, a German gross of over $100 million and admissions in France of 14 million, which is probably about $60 million so around $300 million just from those 3 markets so another $78 million from other markets over several re-releases does not seem that unreasonable. ≠Sudiani (talk) 04:24, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * ok if those figures for AC and TJB is right we can keep it dose it mention any other Disney films we used for this page? Fanoflionking (talk) 10:50, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, it features all Disney animated films with a worldwide gross of over $169 million as at October 2003. Looking at what is missing on this page, it has a WW gross for The Rescuers ($169m) and Lady and the Tramp ($187m). It has a higher reported gross for 101 Dalmatians ($303m) which I can look into. As well as that chart, I also have the worldwide rental data for the initial RKO releases from the RKO ledger so will update some of the older ones like Make Mine Music ($3.275m) and Fun and Fancy Free ($3.165m) Sudiani (talk) 11:23, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I have sent a message to Talk:List of highest grossing films to see if we can get outside import Fanoflionking (talk) 11:39, 16 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Does it have complete data for Snow White? There are plenty of sources that put WW gross at $330 million as of its 50th anniversary in (1987), but it is virtually impossible to track down foreign data after that date. In fact, if you could type in all the grosses here or scan in the article and upload a copy it would be great if we had definitive final grosses for these films. Betty Logan (talk) 11:58, 16 March 2018 (UTC)


 * It also uses the $330 million figure for Snow White. I don't have access to the article at the moment but can scan it at some point if you want. I think the article had domestic and foreign grosses but the only data I have accessible now is the totals.  As well as the Snow White difference, other issues with the chart are that the domestic gross for Jungle Book was $13 million lower than they had published previously (and as per Box Office Mojo) and they listed The Aristocats in 24th place even though the gross listed was the 20th highest.  I think their grosses for Cinderella and Bambi are lower than published elsewhere.  I don't know which is correct.  Finding Nemo was still in release at the time and eventually surpassed The Lion King.  I don't know how easily to format the below into a chart.  As I typed up the list below myself, there may be some discrepancies between the article and what I typed.
 * you also mentioned you have figures for older Disney films like Mine Music ($3.275m) and Fun and Fancy Free ($3.165m) can we also have these figures and sources and any other useful infoFanoflionking (talk) 16:56, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Here a chart of data below to make it more readerable P+T add in any film left in the chart below.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fanoflionking (talk • contribs) 15:24, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for converting that into a chart. For the older ones, the data is from "Richard B. Jewell's RKO film grosses, 1929–51: The C. J. Trevlin Ledger: A comment." Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, Volume 14, Issue 1, 1994.  The relevant data for Disney pictures (not necessarily all or fully animated e.g. Treasure Island and The Reluctant Dragon) from that era is summarized below listed by release date.  These are rental figures from their initial release both domestic and worldwide.  I haven't checked each one, but the domestic rentals are often very similar to those reported in Variety at the time.  As that data is only up to 1951, I also recorded the latest domestic rental that Variety listed on their all-time chart in 1997 (all except Dumbo from here http://variety.com/1997/digital/features/rental-champs-rate-of-return-1116680329/).  For example, the ledger records Dumbo as having a domestic rental of $1 million and worldwide of $2.2 million from its initial release. From later re-releases, I believe Variety reported Dumbo with an all-time domestic rental of $4 million but I have no idea what the updated worldwide figure is.  Hope this is useful to update your older list.  I can update when I have time.
 * ok that laves two things is there anymore and can we update our page with this. Fanoflionking (talk) 19:39, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * That's all I have for now. If I find other information, I will update as necessary. :) Sudiani (talk) 21:38, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * ok should we add this to the page thoughts anyone Fanoflionking (talk) 23:33, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I would suggest updating only where there is no worldwide information listed currently. For films earlier than 1982 where there are differences eg 101 Dalmatians my assumption is that the figure from elsewhere is probably incomplete but would need the look into further before updating. I wouldn’t update for any film after 1986 as the current data is likely OK. Sudiani
 * @Sudiani I think you should update all films you have said unless it had a reiuse (I.E lion king) and Snow White P+T reply when done I will also help update this page Fanoflionking (talk) 17:58, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

rental ranking
Sudiani (talk) 17:53, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

ranking

 * Rank Title Year Worldwide ($ million)


 * 1 The Lion King 1994 784
 * 2 Monsters, Inc. 2001 524
 * 3 Aladdin 1992 504
 * 4 Toy Story 2 1999 485
 * 5 Tarzan 1999 449
 * 6 Finding Nemo 2003 448
 * 7 Beauty and the Beast 1991 380
 * 8 The Jungle Book 1967 378
 * 9 A Bug's Life 1998 364
 * 10 Toy Story 1995 362
 * 11 Dinosaur 2000 355
 * 12 Pocahontas 1995 347
 * 13 Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs 1937 331
 * 14 The Hunchback of Notre Dame 1996 325
 * 15 Mulan 1998 305
 * 16 One Hundred and One Dalmatians 1961 303
 * 17 Lilo & Stitch 2002 269
 * 18 Hercules 1997 253
 * 19 The Little Mermaid 1989 233
 * 20 The Aristocats 1970 191
 * 21 Bambi 1942 188
 * 22 Lady and the Tramp 1955 187
 * 23 Cinderella 1949 182
 * 24 Atlantis: The Lost Empire 2001 180
 * 25 The Emperor's New Groove 2000 169
 * 25 The Rescuers 1977 169 Source - Disney Animated Features at the Worldwide Box office compiled by Anthony D'Alessandro, Variety. Published 27 October 2003 Sudiani (talk) 14:23, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Does 'The SpongeBob Movie: Sponge Out of Water' count as "traditionally animated"?
The SpongeBob Movie: Sponge Out of Water appears under the "Traditional Animation" section, though, as far as I can tell (and according to its Wikipedia article) it seems to be mostly 3D/live action with some traditionally animated parts. Should an only partially-traditionally-animated film appear next to films that are wholly traditional? &mdash; Katie &lt;3 (talk) 12:48, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
 * see past [|Section] for why it counts Fanoflionking (talk) 15:09, 2 April 2018 (UTC)