Talk:List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at McLean Park

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at McLean Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150924041909/http://www.icc-cricket.com/cricket-world-cup/venues/91/mclean-park/stadium to http://www.icc-cricket.com/cricket-world-cup/venues/91/mclean-park/stadium
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170730235357/http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/ground/58857.html?class=1%3Btemplate%3Dresults%3Btype%3Daggregate%3Bview%3Dresults to http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/ground/58857.html?class=1%3Btemplate%3Dresults%3Btype%3Daggregate%3Bview%3Dresults
 * Added tag to http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/ground/58857.html?class=2%3Btemplate%3Dresults%3Btype%3Daggregate%3Bview%3Dresults
 * Added tag to http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=11%3Bfilter%3Dadvanced%3Bground%3D453%3Borderby%3Dstart%3Btemplate%3Dresults%3Btype%3Dbowling%3Bview%3Dinnings%3Bwicketsmin1%3D5%3Bwicketsval1%3Dwickets

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:53, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Version with reworked tables
I've created a different version of this page using tables with some of the information removed. This can be seen at this diff for comparison. This is consistent with a series of discussions which were had at the Cricket wikiproject at the beginning of 2019 - those discussions seemed to reach a level of agreement that the players dismissed as part of a five-wicket haul were probably not necessary to include in the tables. This has, in my view, the advantage that the tables become much easier to read. The discussion can be here and here (with a bonus previous discussion here.

I reworked the other New Zealand ground articles earlier in 2019 and my gut feeling is that this one should be reworked as well - others (such as the Lord's article) were done at the same time by other editors iirc). My only reason for not having done so before is that it's a featured list. Is there any objection to reworking the list to the form linked to above? Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:32, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

No objections to this proposal at all? Blue Square Thing (talk) 00:50, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Give that no one's raised any objections, I'll go ahead. If people hate it then we can chat about it without a problem. Blue Square Thing (talk) 19:24, 6 January 2020 (UTC)