Talk:List of kings of England


 * The first half of the page should be under England/Relationships if anywhere: and certainly a good 25% of the list weren't ruler of an England even remotely as we now conceive of it. Besides which it's a) a sub-page and b) an unrevealing page name: I was expecting to see a breakdown of diplomatic standings with other countries... User:sjc


 * Wouldn't this page be better called British Royal Family, or something similar? -- SJK


 * There's a page called The Dutch monarchy. We should probably be consistant and call this The English Monarchy.  And flesh it out.  --User:corvus13


 * English Monarchy would be good for a part of this list, but it should stop with William III and point to another page called UK Monarchy. Scotland could probably do the same trick -- independent page until 1701, then point to UK Monarchy. The list of names on both would start overlapping with James VI/James I, of course.

Someone needs to get rid of this page, which is redundant now that almost all the monarchs have their own entries.

I'll be working in this area for the forseeable future. Cleaning everything up.

Richhill, Sunday, June 16, 2002

I suggest we stick to the existing List of British monarchs, which seems to cover everything nicely. user:Deb

Both these lists are prehistoric (that is, before February), and in cleaning this up, I didn't even know about this other list, which I just found independently. Let's see if there's anything here that isn't there .... &mdash; Toby Bartels, Thursday, June 27, 2002

OK, they're merged. Redirecting from here to there .... &mdash; Toby Bartels, Thursday, June 27, 2002