Talk:List of kosher restaurants

(Untitled)
What is the purpose of this page? I suggest it be deleted or changed substantially. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.245.22.164 (talk) 20:30, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The purpose is to be a list of notable kosher restaurants.
 * What changes would you propose? Debresser (talk) 17:25, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I moved the page to "notable" kosher restaurants. I think this should placate everyone. Sir Joseph (talk) 00:13, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
 * And I reverted the move. Per WP:LISTNAME: "Best practice is to avoid words like notable, famous, noted, prominent, etc. in the title of a list article."  There is only one article in all of English Wikipedia titled "List of notable . . . " UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:37, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * No, there isn't. Go to the search box and type, "List of notable" You'll see plenty of articles pop up. Sir Joseph (talk) 13:47, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * All but one of those are all redirects, just like List of notable kosher restaurants is now. Use this link to get the list without redirects. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:16, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * So you are edit warring? Sir Joseph (talk) 18:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Reverting: see WP:BRD. You were bold and moved the article (cool), I reverted (also cool), and now we are discussing (also cool).  I think any subsequent moves would best follow the process at WP:Requested moves. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:28, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * There is no consensus for your revert. Your LIST guideline, is a guideline, as it says, common sense applies and exception applies. In this case, the article name, "List of Notable" makes more sense. Sir Joseph (talk) 18:31, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * There was no consensus for your original move to the "notable" version. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:37, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
 * And I didn't need one. And you should know that. And you should also know that when reverting a page move it's best to seek consensus to do so and not to just revert. Sir Joseph (talk) 18:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
 * @Sir Joseph Per WP:BOLD you were perfectly within your rights to make the move. But you are wrong regarding the revert. Discussion should definitely come after a revert, see WP:BRD, but there is no imperative to discuss before a revert. Debresser (talk) 16:48, 16 March 2019 (UTC)