Talk:List of law clerks of the Supreme Court of the United States (Seat 10)

New detail added from Main Page; pic added
For the past couple of months I have updated the Main Page of "list of law clerks of the Supreme Court of the United States." Many more law clerks have been added to the list, and many corrections and edits made to clerk names (middle initials, full names), law schools, graduation dates and prior clerkships. I am now copying and pasting the new material onto each Seat page. To save time, I am bulk copying and pasting the new material. I first scan the Seat page to determine if there is any data there that is not on the Main Page. Also, added a pic of John Yoo, clerked for Clarence Thomas, to the top of the page. Finally, I removed the Wiki warnings at the top of the page for "needs citations" and "this page is incomplete."Bjhillis (talk) 15:32, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of law clerks of the Supreme Court of the United States (Seat 10). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150208034348/http://review.law.umn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Newsletter_Fall_2005.pdf to http://review.law.umn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Newsletter_Fall_2005.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:10, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

notability problem?
I was a little surprised to happen upon this page after receiving a notice that an article I had posted (about a lawyer/politician who had lost his first and only run for statewide office) had now been linked to this page. While that blue link is of course now appropriate, the list of law clerks is fascinating, and I know many actually do end up doing important things, I noticed that almost every law clerk is red-linked, i.e. an article is suggested for this individual. For several years I have been adding wikipedia articles about historical figures, primarily Virginia politicians, and have been criticized several times by those who question their noteworthiness, although they do meet the wikipedia notability guidelines because they were in fact elected, and future historians may find their backgrounds useful. Thus, I'm raising the issue here. I'm not questioning the usefulness of the list article for clerkship applicants, but I really doubt that 95% of even supreme court law clerks (the vast majority of whom then choose to join very large law firms), deserve their own wikipedia articles, notwithstanding the publicity value thereof.Jweaver28 (talk) 23:53, 12 July 2019 (UTC)