Talk:List of magical beings in Charmed

Merge proposal of Magic Character types
Sections...
 * 
 * 
 * 

versus Articles...
 * Avatars (Charmed)
 * Darklighter
 * Whitelighter
 * Table added 12-12-2008 when organizing disparate topics this talk page. Topic seems ''sans significant sufficient discussion (or action) for over eleven months. Notice that I intend to remove tagging sans resolution by the new year.// Fra nkB

Definately the content of this page that describes "whitelighter" as a fictitional creation of charmed should be moved to a suitable page such as "List of magical beings in Charmed (section)" The pitching of spiritual matters as purely fiction is not scientific. There is no reason to pretend that spirits do not exist. It is unscientific to deny observation simply because mechanisms are not understood fully. Especially today as physics is now providing mechanisms to explain the how and where of "paranormal" phenomina. And people in this world who do not have personal observation of "ghost" behaviour are a minority. WhiteLighters are a form of psychic medium that are very real in my personal experience. Silverslith (talk) 11:09, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

This is not so about whether these articles should be merged, but who is willing to merge them (I have never watched the show) so that deletions can be prevented (see Articles for deletion/Warlock (Charmed)). Fact is, per WP:FICT, none of these articles establish notability with secondary sources and therefore don't "deserve" an article per se. You can improve wikipedia by merging relevant information from the old articles here. Thank you. – sgeureka t•c 11:27, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge-Agreed, I will check this page back again in a less than a week, if no one is ready to merge, i might do it myself.But i need first to make sure that no one opposes this merger, and as Sgeureka said, it does not establish notability per se, and it is better off combined with another article that shares the same idea/topic. I am familiar with the show (not a big fan or expert though) &Lambda;ua&int; Wi  se  (talk) 13:46, 13 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I agree with merging. These articles alone have no notability . -- Magioladitis (talk) 00:05, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Disagree with merger, in that notability shouldn't necessarily trump editorial judgement and good organization. Quite likely these terms would be searched, so worthy of article status as being 'On Point, On Topic' to the readership out there. We're developing entirely too many extremely clunky and long articles and should keep short topics where there is enough for a screen page. Neither is citing multiple sources a necessary thing, but a nicety put in place against mature reasoning. Not everything needs justified&mdash;the attitude that it does is juvenile reliance on authority, not mature exercise of editorial responsibility and judgments. // Fra nkB 16:57, 12 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge. FrankB's point seems to be that having lots of overly-long, nicely laid-out articles is preferable to one regular-size and summary one. Well, by Wikipedia standards, none of this even needs writing... it's all Plot without Notability. So, merge for now, but delete all might even be preferable.~ZytheTalk to me! 17:21, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Question on season 6
In season 6, when Leo finds out that Gideon is trying to kill Wyatt, he throws him across the cave as if he had super strength. Was it super strength or just telekinesis? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.194.95 (talk) 21:33, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Please do not ask questions here! Its Not A Forum..Although To Be Nice And Answer The Question, It May Just Be Telekinesis.86.151.109.218 (talk) 15:27, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Sorry for treating this page like its a forum but to me the answer to that question is unknown because as an Elder Leo might have been able to empower himself with a number of different abilities which would explain (what could have been) his super strengh. But of course since thats an offence power and alot more violent then lightening you wouldn`t see the Elders use it since there pacifists. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.202.182.175 (talk) 19:05, 11 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Well it is a forum, just not the Q&A service for fan questions, but editorial questions are spot on. IMHO, simple adrenaline and rage wouldn't be sufficient, though he was mad enough! Occums razor says telekinesis covers it, no need for postulation of new powers, which would be O.R. // Fra nkB 16:57, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Merger proposal #2-The Hollow
The Hollow should not be merged with List of magical beings in Charmed because the Hollow is an magical artifact. It's not alive. It has no sense, it's just magic. It does not classify as a "being." SidekickJermaine (talk) 17:51, 20 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Concur -- as someone already removed article page tagging, removed the section tag here today. // Fra nkB 16:57, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Other beings
Shouldn't the Cleaners also be added here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.175.13.2 (talk) 11:58, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

The Elders Powers
This is for the person who added those other powers(shown below) to the elders section. Before adding them could you please provide the names of the episodes they were shown being used in?

Ability to Absorb Lighting Bolts. Fire Balls, Fire Blasts, Ability to take powers and grant them, Elemental Manipulation and Great Influence on Magic World —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.202.182.22 (talk) 19:17, 21 November 2008 (UTC)