Talk:List of major Naruto characters/Archive 1

The Team/Individual images
Snap changed them, no problem there though I personally think the individual images worked better. Better quaility and whatnot. Either way I saved all of them in case we need them. TheUltimate3 11:20, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Please change the photos back. If they don't deserve their own article, they at least deserve their own images.


 * Would if I could. I would if I could, however I am more than certain it would start a needless edit war. Pity ain't it. TheUltimate3 01:59, 16 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I would argue that clarity is worth discussing even if it results in an edit war. we should add individual pics Gailim 03:12, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * On this subject, didn't the timeskip group image have the names in English a while back? What's with it being changed? - The Norse (talk) 02:02, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

A proposal to replace this article.
I finally had a bit of free time, so here's an idea on how to alter this article: User:UC'tCM!/Squads in Naruto. The content mostly comes from Konoha 11, but it also includes some merged items from List of Konoha ninja and Land of Wind as well as some original prose.

Basically, (List of) Squads in Naruto has data on the four main squads, Gaara's squad, and the Third's Squad as well as brief mentions to other squads seen throughout the series and some information about squads in general. It deals with the problem of this article's name quite nicely and includes ninjas that are more prominent than the rest in List of Konoha ninja but not quite important enough to have their own articles.

I'd also suggest a merge of Major characters in Naruto to go along with this; It ought to include other squaddies such as Shikamaru, arc "bosses" such as Zabuza and Neji, or other prominent allies such as Iruka and the Third. I'll get to work on that next time.  You Can '  t See Me!  20:39, 18 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Ok! Ok! Thats fine! Thats damn fine! I have been proposing this kind of crap forever and I got f-in nowhere. Thats fine. Thats.TheUltimate3 21:17, 18 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Oh, I hadn't noticed this. I guess we had similar ideas at the same time. Would you still like a team article or is the current "solution" acceptable? ~SnapperTo 21:41, 18 August 2007 (UTC)


 * This was the thing I have been proposing. I was just ignored! (Alot!)TheUltimate3 21:43, 18 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't believe you ever suggested a page move, in which case the current content would be out of place. If you did I apologize for not noticing. ~SnapperTo 21:46, 18 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Erm, sorry about that, Ultimate. I haven't been on Naruto-related articles or discussions for a while; it was actually the CN Naruto marathon that reminded me about this article this morning. Anyways, Snapper, I'm fine with either solution; the only major differences are the mentions of other teams. Let's wait for other opinions now. Sorry for the hassle. Great minds think alike, I suppose.  You Can '  t See Me!  21:57, 18 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I chose the current name because I figured anything else would encompass too much material. Given that this article is merely meant to alleviate the workload of List of Konoha ninja, expanding its horizons to other villages and lesser teams would would call for something else to remove the stress. Until other articles become to big for their breeches the current scope should suffice. ~SnapperTo 22:14, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

No need for immidient move this is perfect at the moment, though I do wish we could stop the IP from placing the obvious everywhere. Wait got a plan.TheUltimate3 21:58, 18 August 2007 (UTC)


 * If you let them have their way for an hour they should lose interest in sticking around to re-add their changes, at which point you can revert at leisure. ~SnapperTo 22:14, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

That would have ben good to know before I spent the last 10 to 15min going back and forth with that guy only to put that semi-lock on...TheUltimate3 22:17, 18 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I actually suggest we put all of the "multiple-character articles" (List of Naruto summons and List of Konoha ninja, for example) into this article and seperate it into several different articles, like Pokemon does and we formerly did with the ninjutsu articles. This could actually help deal with the countless "article to be deleted because blah blah blah" Naruto has been getting lately. It could also help go more in depth about the characters. Worthless ones (like Tailed beasts 2-4, extremely minor Konoha ninja, and the worthless summons like that giant bird thing) should just be forgotten. Artist Formerly Known As Whocares 21:21, 10 September 2007 (UTC)


 * I disagree. The point of having Multiple-character articles is to keep things ordered and structured. As of now each of the sub-articles serve their purpose well. All the Sand people with the Sand, the minor Konoha nin with the Minor Konoha nin and the major four teams being where the major four teams are.--TheUltimate3 21:26, 10 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Of course you disagree. ^_^ This seems very rash at first (even I was surprised), but really it is a good idea if you give it a chance. SaiyanIsland managed to do so grealty (although they are missing several characters, although they're manga-only at this point), so there's no reason we should be uncapabalbe of doing so should we put our minds to it. Artist Formerly Known As Whocares 21:43, 10 September 2007 (UTC)


 * I disagree not because it may be difficult but simply because it to just doesn't seem needed. The List of Major Naruto Teams is just that, a list of major teams. The Land of Wind (While giving larger bit of info talks about everyone from that land which serves its purpose. I really don't see a need to have a Pokemon style format for these characters.--TheUltimate3 21:53, 10 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Shouldnt we add the souryuu tensakai that Tenten used in episdoe 28 of shippuuden at the end. Tintor2 19:37, 8 October 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tintor2 (talk • contribs)

Asuma in the present tense
as i was reading the page i noticed that Asuma Sarutobi is still being referenced in the present text. since he was killed during the fight with Hidan should his article not be re-written in the past tense? M877y 16:55, 19 August 2007 (UTC)


 * No. Literature and related media are formally spoken of in the present tense.  You Can '  t See Me!  17:26, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Shouldnt we add the souryuu tensakai that Tenten used in episdoe 28 of shippuuden at the end. Tintor2 17:07, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use image removal
Fair use images have repeatedly been removed from this article for violating our policies on the use of fair use images found at Non-free content criteria #3(a) and #8, and Foundation:Resolution:Licensing policy. Removals of this type have been occurring all across the project. A sample of such efforts may be found at User:Durin/Fair_Use_Overuse. This type of removal has been debated many times in the past, with the result that the images have been removed and ultimately remained removed. Please see User:Durin/Fair_use_overuse_explanation for some example debates.

If you still feel motivated to dispute our policy and wish to engage in discussion with specific regards to the use of such images on this and closely related articles, please centralize discussion at Talk:List of Akatsuki members. --Durin 12:55, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * u call for a centralized discussion at a deleted page and reference a bunch of long dead debates. nice way to shutdown comment. it's especially problematic when u permanently remove charater artwork for a medium that conveys its story thru art. the charater artwork u have removed is that of characters on 'major' teams that are seen repeatedly in the series and not one off characters that show up for a few chapters/episodes and never come back. if these characters don't deserve individual articles, the least they deserve in reference to a comic/anime is a picture of their artistic representation. it is a necessary component to understanding the series. if neji has his own article, does his teammate not even warrant a picture? -24.214.236.85 19:08, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

The only images we should bring back are Guy, 8, and 10 in Part 1. Three is allowed by whatever policy is about fair-use images (if you know the exact one I mean, please change it the link so I will know later), and they are the closest we can get to a right-hand corner image, as there isn't one of all four teams together that isn't fan-made. Also, that was linked prior to the article's deletion. Artist Formerly Known As Whocares 19:59, 31 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Actually, if somebody could get a screenshot of the teams in their lines right before the Chunin Exam preliminaries (as in, all of the lines in one image), it could work. It would be a distant shot, but it could still detail each of the characters on the page, save for Sai and the Jonin leaders. Durin did point out that group shots are okay. I'd feel better about that, actually; piling on the images now that Durin cannot enforce his point would feel like kicking him while he's down.  You Can ' t Review Me!!! 23:49, 31 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The only pics we really need are the old "Rookie 9" image and the image of team 8 in Part 2. With that we got all characters in both times covered, except Tenten in Part 1 (but nobody will miss her) and the Jonins (that may be a problem). That would be 2 images on this page and that MUST be okay with the "fair use". ~ Felcis 15:25, 6 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Team Guy is left forgotten.... I'll just add the Part II image, despite Guy not being in it. Artist Formerly Known As Whocares 16:04, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Might Guy????
I'm pretty sure his name is MAITO GAI... right?--41.208.227.74 20:21, 6 September 2007 (UTC)


 * It is Maito Gai, in Japanese. It translates to Might Guy in English.--TheUltimate3 20:24, 6 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The Company doing the voiceovers for the english verion translate it to Might, but in most dubs it remains Maito Blackfenix52 04:56, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Might Guy is the official... I don't need to look archives to be sure that this was discussed hundreds of times. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.1.58.134 (talk) 03:04, 15 October 2007 (UTC)


 * It is officially Might Guy. There was conjecture on it awhile back, but one of the official Naruto guides from Japan declared it as Might Guy, not Maito Guy.  I think Kishimoto may have retconned it.KuroKorin 07:15, 12 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Surely were using japanese names, since we put the family name first? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.69.83.28 (talk) 21:31, 26 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Where is the family name being put first? ~SnapperTo 06:12, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Naruto characters after timesskip.jpg
Image:Naruto characters after timesskip.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 18:30, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Spoiler Alert
This page should probably have a spoiler alert, as it contains information from episodes not yet translated to the english version. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackfenix52 (talk • contribs) 05:00, 19 September 2007 (UTC)


 * We do not use spoilers to block off plot summary. This is an encyclopedia - people should expect spoilers the moment they attempt to find an article. Sephiroth BCR  ( Converse ) 06:13, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

I agree that people should expect to read things here that will spoil things for them, but we should still have spoiler warnings. You know, in case someone has a blonde moment and forgets to only read so far. (*no offense to any blondes. it's just an expression)ichliebezuko

THEY HAVE THE SAME EYES






--68.161.152.145 00:35, 22 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Not quite. Pein has more concentric circles; the discrepancy is more obvious in color.  You Can '  t See Me!  00:37, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Dragon Scattering Destruction?
When does Tenten use this jutsu? It's certainly not in the manga so I assume it was an anime episode? 214.13.209.200 23:23, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

She uses it in shippuuden to defeat her clone only in the anime. Tintor2 18:18, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Sai Yamato.png
Image:Sai Yamato.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 20:10, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Shikamaru, Neji, and Lee
why do these three still have articles? I cant think of anything particularly special about these three. i guess you could say that they have character development but not too much more than the others. the point could be made that Neji and Lee have back stories but that didn't exactly save Ino's or Hinata's article from deletion now did it? wasn't the whole point of of all these mergers to get consistency across the section? so why not finish the job? Gailim 02:59, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The point of the mergers was to merge those who can be adequately summarized in 2-3 paragraphs. If you can do that with those three (though I'd personally object to Shikamaru), you are welcome to merge them. ~SnapperTo 03:58, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * To be honest Id rather not. I've been against all these mergers ever since they happened. And despite searching I still can't locate the discussion where people decided to do this (I would have liked to have my say in the matter). But I figure if it has to be done then might as well keep it consistent. Though I maintain the position that the whole section has suffered (and now it even spilled over into BLEACH). Gailim 05:40, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Talk:List of Naruto characters and its archive were one such location. And "consistency" was never a reason for any of the merges, in case you're curious. ~SnapperTo 06:09, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * ah now that I actually see the discussion, I have even more questions, there are characters have been merged who weren't even on the lists you all had. Frankly I think we should pick a system and go with it. Either merge all the support teams or give them their own articles (its not as if Wiki is running out of space). If you've all decided to merge the others then theres nothing about these three that are so important to make them stand out (like team 7). The way things are right now, it seems weird. as if the three of you got together and said these three supporting characters were more important than the other six Gailim 06:45, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * What makes them more important is that, well, there is so much there. Thats the point of why (I can't) see them being merged. Its not as simple with Tenten or Hinata. Fudge, Hinata only got close to being able to keep her page because someone dragged out the "Naruto and Hinata" section of it.--TheUltimate3 21:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

I was searching for the discussion where they decided to merge the articles. I think it's not so much summarising people in 2-3 paragraphs but elaborating on them for a page. At the start of last year all the chracters had healthy sized articles and I don't see why we decided to merge them. Just my opinion. 121.220.155.43 (talk) 03:02, 4 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Because every Naruto article was almost hit with the Delete Stick, for being (probably) one of the most up-to-date, "organized", popular articles based on FICTION. The Wikipedia Extremist didn't like that (Because it made the notion that Wikipedia is a failed project correct) and began a nice crusade to stop it. We've done everything in our power salvage what we could and the results was yeah.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 11:51, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Picture layout
Just out of curiousity, why can't we put one picture on the left and the other on the right? Is it because of WP:MOS?  σмgн gσмg  06:24, 7 November 2007 (UTC)


 * You're not supposed to frame text if you can avoid it, for one. Two, there's a bunch of empty whitespace to the right for image use. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 06:27, 7 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I suppose... but the white space in between the paragraphs look horrible. It's just me, I'm a perfectionist. =P  σмgн gσмg  07:56, 7 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't see any whitespace except that created by the TOC. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 00:02, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Why does this article exist?
It would be fine for very minor characters, but characters like Kiba, Chouji, etc. deserve their own articles. I mean, why is that the Yu-Gi-Oh Wikiproject is allowed to spam every last Yu-Gi-Oh GX character with their own article, but we can't even get an article on Kiba? What's the criteria?

MontanaHatchet 07:02, 14 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Because the Yu-Gi-Oh Wikiproject editors are ambitious and not on the target list. As we are also ambitous but ALSO on the target list,we have this list. The characters listed here are main enough to NOT be apart of that already long list, but at the same time they are not notable enough to get their own articles. And for the record most of the Yu-Gi-Oh characters PERIOD don't deserve their articles but I really don't care. Thats the Yu-Gi-Oh Taskforce's job to do what they please.--TheUltimate3 11:33, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Now that the page was merged
And the history has pretty much been rendered inaccessable through normal means, is there still a way to get to it EDIT: Idiot TheUltimate3....the List of the major Konoha Teams. Is there a way to get to that history?--TheUltimate3 (talk) 02:15, 25 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Konoha teams and this article have the same history; Konoha teams was moved to the current title. ~SnapperTo 03:38, 25 November 2007 (UTC)


 * That would have been SO much nicer to know before I spent a good 20 minutes searching, finding what I want, leave for a good while then come back to see that.^_^ Thanks for the update.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 03:52, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Why don't you have the other characters birthdays!
We were wondering what the bithdays of the characters were and we come here and find... NO BIRTHDAYS FOR MOST OF THE CHARACTERS!!! What about kiba? What about temari? What about itachi? ect... NEXT TIME WE ARE NOT COMING HERE FOR BIRTHDAYS!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.28.211.152 (talk) 00:00, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

I think its just minor information like their hobbies or type of blood. However the day of birth is placed in big articles Kakashi Hatake and others. Tintor2 00:31 28 November 2007 (UTC)

... MR T???
Tenten

* Age: 13-14 in Part I, 16 in Part II   * Rank: Yuri Baka * Seiyu: Me   * Voice actor: Mr. T

Mr. T.... Yes, a burly African-American man plays a small girl... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chanceeastham (talk • contribs) 02:20, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Help
Sorry, I'm not sure if this is where you talk, but I'm a newbie, and I can't seem to figure out how to correct vandalism done by a ReddBaron1. I fixed Chouji, Tenten, Kankuro and Temari’s; but I can't change Kurenai Yuhi's, Shino Aburame's and Asuma Sarutobi’s mini info boxes. If someone who knows how to do or if someone could tell me, I’ll gladly help. (The vandalism includes changing Seiyu and Voice actor- I don't know the original ones, and I don't know where to find the 'undo' of that particular error.)

Idiosyncrastic 02:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC)Idiosyncrastic —Preceding unsigned comment added by Idiosyncrastic (talk • contribs) 02:53, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Sai gave one picture a name
See http://groups.msn.com/NarutoMangaReturns/rvolume35.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=31053 and before then for details. Wikipedia is supposed to be correct and up-to-date not aesthetic. So the sentence deleted or made right.


 * That is not a picture, it's a window. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 01:38, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Sai's article and Ino
I had modified the insulting phrase in Sai article regarding Ino Yamanaka - "such as calling Ino Yamanaka beautiful" - stop putting this phrase back! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.20.118.108 (talk) 07:37, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Or you could just stop removing it. He does say it. If you'd like to deny it, read this. ~SnapperTo 22:32, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Just ignore them. Probably a ShikaIno fan who is bitter that their ship has a 0% chance of happening because of Temari. 125.0.4.15 (talk) 03:57, 8 December 2007 (UTC)


 * SnapperTo is that right? U is for Unity (talk) 06:28, 9 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Any copy of chapter 311 will have that scene. Search Google if you'd like. ~SnapperTo 19:52, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Source?
The Italian equivalent of this article is using a more descriptive than what is currently in use here. The problem is that there's no source information for the image, and so I don't know where it's from. Assuming it's actually from the anime, what episode(s) does it appear in? ~SnapperTo 23:38, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


 * 60-80 opening credits I believe. Somewhere in there. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 10:51, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Proctors?
Think we can add some of the Jonin onto this page? Baki, Anko, Genma, Raido, Ibiki, Hayate, and Shizune? 129.170.104.215 (talk) 20:48, 7 December 2007 (UTC) Fantasy Leader


 * In what sense are they major? They only make minor contributions to single arcs. ~SnapperTo 21:38, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Strange statement
Some statement was added into Sai article "This causes Sai to become a kind person willing to help his friends as well as Naruto would" do author call Naruto "kind person" even if he trying to protect such a betrayal as Sasuke from Sai's insults? (Naruto Shippuden Ep. 36-37) U is for Unity (talk) 09:17, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Ino Yamanaka Article Separation
Please, do not remove this article, I made it because Ino Yamanaka is more important due to some reasons (at exampla: she played a vital role in Sakura's childhood, and since Shikamaru Nara have the article, Ino deserve it more! —Preceding unsigned comment added by U is for Unity (talk • contribs)


 * Importance within the series means nothing. Whether or not the article can comply with WP:FICT determines if a character gets an article. ~SnapperTo 21:19, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

WHY did we omit/edit out Choji's death in the Animated Series??
...And the reason why I'm asking that, is because we as Wikipedia are supposed to be a source of information, not necessarily worry about whether or not people may come here and see that Choji died in the animated series (assuming that that was the reason why somebody removed the 'deceased' blurb). If there is a difference between the animated series and the manga, we should note it, but we souldn't be hiding it.

IF, in fact, Choji wasn't killed off in the animated series, I ask someone to provide proof of same; otherwise I'm going to re-introduce the addendum that I put in earlier.

If somebody comes to Wikipedia and sees what we know to be the current information on a given subject (and it ruins the surprise for them), that's not our problem. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thanos777 (talk • contribs) 03:49, 17 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Because the food pills did NOT kill Choji. He's alive and kicking way into the two years after he ate them. You either have been only watching the English Dubs (If you are, then I suggest you stop reading Wikipedia) you simply chose to ignore facts presented to you. As such as alot of me is saying this is Forum Talk, though I have nothing to back that claim on I'll leave it at that.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 04:26, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

"..You simply chose to ignore facts presented to you.."

What the hell does THAT mean?? That sentence sounds as if I have been actually arguing with you, when in fact this is the first time I've even seen you in here.

And, yes, not all of us DL fan-subbed Anime from Japan off the 'Net (the so-called English Dubs are the only ones that I've seen), yes not all of us who might see a certain Anime Series are willing or able to afford it -they price the damned DVDs so high while usually providing so very few episodes on those discs in return -and yes, I am indeed aware that animated series OFTEN depart from their manga counterparts (hence the reason why I stated 'in the animated version').

So drop the long knives and be productively useful instead of sniping.Thanos777 (talk) 06:19, 17 December 2007 (UTC)


 * No idea why you are so jumpidy about this. But seriously, the kid is not dead. Not dead at all. Came close to dying (which I have high doubts would be added to the section. Some sort of plot detail or something. Who knows.) but never dead. Thats why your addition was removed from the article, because he never died. And because Wikipedia is as far along as Part II and the Manga and the Anime, if you don't want to spoil Naruto for yourself, I suggest you stop reading the Wikipedia articles. Naruto Wiki included. And to answer your question: "You simply chose to ignore facts presented to you" refered to whats actually in the article. If Choji had died during Part I at the age of 12-13, why would his age by 15 in Part II? Would that age a corpse in the ground?--TheUltimate3 (talk) 11:51, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Nine-Tails Isn't Major?
Am I the only one who objects to this? He plays a major role in the series, bigger than Kiba, Ino, Choji, and others listed here, and is a major plot-building device. I suggest we move him here. Artist Formerly Known As Whocares (talk) 01:07, 25 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Be bold then and move him is all I say. Fudge it I'll do it for ya.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 01:35, 25 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I put it under minor since the fox, as a character, doesn't do much of value. Serving as a plot device is its major contribution. I don't care where it goes, but please at least fix the links. ~SnapperTo 02:55, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Asuma
What is this about Sarutobi being Asuma's father? Isn't he his uncle? —Preceding unsigned comment added by DrTheKay (talk • contribs) 08:28, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Its in one of the chapters right before Asuma dies... Asuma says that Sarutobi was a great dad. -- Ghost Stalker (Got a present for ya! | Mission Log) 20:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Hinata was not going to be a ninja?
In the article it states, "Before her appearance Masashi Kishimoto had intended not to make her a ninja and to give her normal clothes instead of the Hyuga clothes" where did this person get their information? This is my first time hearing about this...HinaXhyuga (talk) 13:51, 1 January 2008

Check the reference. If you find any mistake correct it. Tintor2 21:20, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Suigetsu tired because of the sword?
When was this implied? If anything, he seems to need breaks to drink water regularly, probably due to the the experiments that left him somewhat liquid in nature. All I'm saying is that if neither of these possibilities is confirmed, why jump to conclusions? Please rectify --Ortiloco (talk) 14:54, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Akamaru + Team 8
I notice in this article that Akamaru is in the "other" section. He should be in the team 8 section for he is Kibas ninken (ninja dog) and therefore his partner in combat, making him an Honorary member of team 8. I went ahead and changed it but voice your opinions and reasons here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.154.67.55 (talk) 19:16, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Be bold and move it then.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 21:58, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Naruto's whiskers
Quick thing I noticed. Naruto's whiskers were attributed to the presence of the fox, but in chp. 382, we see naruto as a baby with minato and Kushina and he still has his whiskers. Does that not mean that the whiskers existed pre demon sealing and therefore have no relation to the demon fox whatsoever? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.216.21.34 (talk) 04:43, 8 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Which panel are you referring to? In the only chapter 382 panel depicting baby Naruto he is being held by an unknown person. The person's clothing suggests the Third, as does the anime version of the panel. What's the indication that it's Minato or Kushina? ~SnapperTo 04:54, 8 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Look more closely. The scene with both Minato and Kushina shows Kushina as being pregnant with Naruto.  The later panel on that page is from a later time. –Gunslinger47 06:52, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Random guess:Writer's error. 76.0.92.136 (talk) 02:32, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Shizune?
I was wondering if Shizune should be added to this page. If characters like Chiyo are on here, why not Shizune? She plays a major roll during the Tsunade's Decision Arc, and makes numerous appearances throughout the series. Think she deserves a spot on this page? 71.181.76.56 (talk) 17:00, 19 January 2008 (UTC) Fantasy Leader


 * The Third and Chiyo are kind of "borderline major"; their only major appearance/contribution is during a single arc where they contribute greatly to a battle, and then die. Shizune is more comparable to Izumo and Kotetsu; they all appear in a major arc and make a number of reappearances, but their contributions to that major arc are somewhat negligible. If anything, given the size of this article, the Third and Chiyo would go to minor. ~SnapperTo 18:36, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

I understand. So you mean that Shizune hasn't put much impact on the plot. I guess Chiyo could be considered as minor. As for the Third Hokage, I think he should stay. He's made a pretty large impact on the plot, despite getting killed off. If he hadn't sealed Orochimaru's arms, Orochimaru would've already had Sasuke, the Leaf Village would be destroyed, Tsunade wouldn't be Hokage, and other things like that. 71.181.76.56 (talk) 03:48, 21 January 2008 (UTC) Fantasy Leader

merge
does naruto need to be merged?-- Blue-Eyes  Gold Dragon   17:55, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * If you mean Naruto Uzumaki I would say no. The article does have out of universe infomarion from sites such as IGN and Gamespot. --76.66.191.62 (talk) 21:18, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

I have a question, why do you guys merge everything!?!? Do you guys get finned ever time you dont merge something. People like rock lee, itachi, shikamaru,negi, hinata. I mean why. If you say they are not doing much in the story right now so the can be meged, the merge naruto, sakura, and kakashi! They are barely doing anything now. plz unmerge all those people.--Naruto Beier (talk) 04:23, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Chiyo
May I ask why Chiyo is on this page? Is she major? Just asking. 66.220.242.162 (talk) 15:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC) fantasy leader