Talk:List of neighbourhoods of Jamshedpur

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:46, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Dalma Hill.jpg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:26, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Dalma Hill.jpg

This article is a disaster.
Only one citation. Tons of grammatical errors. It needs someone knowledgeable to salvage it. FPTI (talk) FPTI (talk) 06:40, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Agreed FPTI - unfortunately the article was created by User:Weareme234 and largely edited by him and his socks. Arjayay (talk) 11:25, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria

As stated at Stand-alone lists, Notability and Manual of Style/Lists:- This list fails most of these requirements in that:- I will add wikilinks to all the entries and remove all redlinks, as per the above guidelines, as none have citations. I will also use a standardized, list format, as there are too many different formats in use - Arjayay (talk) 11:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) All lists must have clearly defined inclusion criteria
 * 2) Every entry should meet the notability criteria for its own article.  Red-linked entries are acceptable if the entry is verifiably a member of the list, and it is reasonable to expect an article could be forthcoming in the future.  This prevents indiscriminate lists, and prevents individual lists from being too large to be useful to readers.
 * 3) Editors may, at their discretion, choose to limit large lists by only including entries for independently notable items or those with Wikipedia articles.
 * 4) All list entries must follow Wikipedia's core content policies of Verifiability (by citing reliable sources as references), No original research, and Neutral point of view
 * There are no clearly defined inclusion criteria
 * Most of the entries are not "verifiably a member of the list" in that they have neither an article nor a reference
 * As per the above rules, all redlinks, without a citation, should be removed
 * Redlinks with a citation, should only remain if it is "reasonable to expect an article could be forthcoming", although how this can/should be assessed is unclear. However, there is only one citation, about a football club, not about a neighbourhood of Jamshedpur.


 * FPTI - I Have brought the article in line with the above exclusions - drastic, but it needed it. What remains is to agree the inclusion criteria. As per item 3 above, "Editors may .... choose to limit large lists by only including .... those with Wikipedia articles" I propose this is the most appropriate inclusion criteria - any objections? - Arjayay (talk) 12:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)